Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul for President, Are You Freaking kidding Me

Posted on 12/29/2011 10:43:07 AM PST by TheNewPatriot

All you Ron Paul supporters, you are obviously one digit short of a normal IQ or have a single digit IQ. No conservative believes we had anything to do with 911 or believes we brought it on ourselves. Once you step into the realm of 911 being America's fault, you're in the realm of kook ville anti-America rhetoric. I don't want a President that's going to sympathize with our enemies and rationalize it as it must be our fault. We have that already with Obamalama. If you like that, vote for Hussein. Also, being a military veteran, I'm sure as hell not voting for some clueless idiot that denies there's still a threat out there against America and wants to deal with it by dismantling our military. Mr. Paul demonstrates that he has a dangerous and fundamental misunderstanding of the threat posed to every American citizen by radical Islam and the little Hitler running Iran.

Let's also not forget the racist newspaper. Don't even go there with the excuse he had no idea what was being printed. You have to be walking Mr. Magoo not knowing your name is attached to such racist filth. Bottom line, Mr. Paul is many things, but conservative is not one of them and he isn't the answer America is looking for to return to that shinning light on the hill of greatness. Greatness doesn't come from being a pacifist or supporter of leftist social policies.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; 911truther; fedcrimes; galvestonsnoopy; goldmansachs; libertarians; randpaultruthfile; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-219 next last
To: TheNewPatriot; Admin Moderator

Whatever you think of Ron Paul, or Romney, or Perry, or Gingrich. or whoever, what do you expect to accomplish by posting something so inflammatory?

Whoever wins the Republican nomination is going to need the support of all Republicans and independents, regardless of which candidate they supported in the primaries. Why do you think it is appropriate to insult anyone that you will eventually need to vote against Obama?

Personal attacks are prohibited on FR. Seriously, you should be ashamed of youself.


51 posted on 12/29/2011 11:21:36 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

Deleted for wanting Constitutional Government. Let’s hope not. This site could become as irrelevant as the GOP establishment.


52 posted on 12/29/2011 11:22:53 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps
so any people who post anything pro-paul have accounts deleted? Sad. Conservatism is about ideas,

This site is for Conservative ideas. Cut and Run is anything but a Conservative. He is liberal through and through.
53 posted on 12/29/2011 11:23:23 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: John D

ok, I don’t keep up enough, who is “cut and run”? thanks


54 posted on 12/29/2011 11:24:47 AM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Paul and Bachman are messing up these primaries. I’m friggin’ mad about it.”

What’s messing up the primaries are the bumbling globalist idiots currently leading the pack. How about a genuine leader, a real conservative who holds constitutional principles and a rational/common sense approach to foreign policy? Then Paul would likely be ignored and in single digits.


55 posted on 12/29/2011 11:26:22 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican
Have you seen this "magazine," or merely parroting a media smear?

It is funny, isn't it that we only hear about 20 year old accusations when Dr. Paul's support surged. Kind of reminds me of the fact that we only heard charges than Herman Cain was a woman-abuser, when his vote surged.

Does it occur to you that perhaps the media is not even trying to be objective; and that smear material is being organized for use against each of the candidates, for the most opportune moment?

William Flax

56 posted on 12/29/2011 11:26:29 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Barack Obama for president! Are you freaking kidding me? But there he is, so as kooky as Ron Paul is, his presidency could be another self-inflicted joke on Americans. Before that happens, we will get another four years of the Obamarama, and the death of this grand experiment.


57 posted on 12/29/2011 11:27:11 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kinzua
Paul is not the most fortunate flag bearer for the Originalist voter but he’ll have to do until someone better comes along.

Right. Nobody in the GOP field is better than the anti-Semitic, Iran-enabling truther asshole Ron Paul, who believes America is to blame for 9/11.

Ron Paul Troll Alert

58 posted on 12/29/2011 11:27:23 AM PST by Chunga (What a load of codswallop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
Either threat can be dealt with, without our invoking the language of panic

Not if the surrender monkey had his way and we gutted our military. Our strength is a deterrence to our enemies. Have you ever seen a bully pick on someone bigger and stronger than him?
59 posted on 12/29/2011 11:27:50 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Personal attacks are prohibited on FR. Seriously, you should be ashamed of youself.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Seriously, you should see post 11.


60 posted on 12/29/2011 11:29:03 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

I posted a favorable article about Ron Paul a few weeks ago and have not been deleted, but I have seen calls for the banning of others regarding RP so have kept my mouth, or fingers rather, quiet since about posting any articles. I have always been respectful of people and differing opinions.


61 posted on 12/29/2011 11:29:30 AM PST by Gennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

I believe you nailed it. Paul is only a temporary face of a lasting ideal. Glad for this awakening, it actually gives me hope for future candidates and elections.


62 posted on 12/29/2011 11:29:41 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

No one in North Korea believes it’s their duty to bring about the arrival of the 12th Imam. And this is not an hysterical claim.

Speaking of the Koreas, does President Paul pull troops out of South Korea?


63 posted on 12/29/2011 11:30:30 AM PST by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
Whoever wins the Republican nomination is going to need the support of all Republicans and independents, regardless of which candidate they supported in the primaries. Why do you think it is appropriate to insult anyone that you will eventually need to vote against Obama?

Well said! While I have serious doubts about the suitability of either Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum, I have tried to avoid too harsh language, for the reasons you state. I honestly feel that their approach to foreign policy is too close to all the mistakes of the past twenty years, but that does not mean that either would not listen to honest advice from those who have a better grasp of human behavior--such as the immortal Washington, as cited in my first post on this thread.

William Flax

64 posted on 12/29/2011 11:32:05 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Is post #11 satire? If not, are you also authorized to have the tooth fairy revoke birthdays or something even more threatening.


65 posted on 12/29/2011 11:33:09 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: trapped_in_LA

“But who are you supporting? A bunch of RINOs that once in office won’t do squat to bring down the size of government or do anything about the loss of freedoms we have suffered in the past few decades.”

Don’t worry, Romney will save us. His “conservative” version of ObamaCare is second to none.


66 posted on 12/29/2011 11:33:41 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

To simply name call or to assume that all his supporters are just anti-american pot heads is foolish. Paul is the only candidate running that convinces people he hates the government as much as they do. If ANY of the other candidates would adopt his stance on the FED or the constitutionality of federal agencies, or any number of his other domestic agendas Paul’s support would crater.

As it is people are left with the unfortunate choice between big government hackery from the Newt McRomney crowd or dangerous foreign policy by Paul. Rather than simply write off Paul supporters as defective, other candidates would do well to examine what makes otherwise conservative people support this man.


67 posted on 12/29/2011 11:33:41 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kinzua
If the GOP doesn’t address the concerns of the Constitutionalist/Originalist voter, they will be alienating what appears to be a large contingent of voters. From what I’ve read from his supporters, they are not so much supporting the man as his platform.

I really, really don't like Paul. But you have hit the nail on the head, and I agree with you. People are hungry for candidates and leaders who will be faithful to the constitution and who care about original intent. Which is to say, faithful to their oath of office, since they all swear allegiance to a constitution it seems few of them believe in and few of them have read.

And people are tired of being denigrated by GOP poobahs for believing in the constitution. We expect to get attacked by Dems; it really riles people to be attacked by their own party for believing in what the party is supposed to believe in but maybe no longer does.

68 posted on 12/29/2011 11:34:12 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kinzua; Jim Robinson

Is post #11 satire? If not, are you also authorized to have the tooth fairy revoke birthdays or something even more threatening.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Satire?

Gee. I don’t know. Lets say we ping the author of said “satire” and see what he thinks?

Jim. This Paultard thinks you are posting satire. What say you?


69 posted on 12/29/2011 11:36:43 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: John D
When has Dr. Paul suggested gutting our military? That is a baseless charge. The truth of the matter is that our military is now so spread out, as to be vulnerable in many situations.

Again. The Ron Paul foreign policy/defense strategy is a 21st Century manifestation of the Washington/Jefferson foreign policy. See An American Foreign Policy.

It is not a policy of weakness. It punishes the first insult. But it does not try to change other people's cultures. It leads by benign example, not intrusion.

William Flax

70 posted on 12/29/2011 11:38:08 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

TattleTail!


71 posted on 12/29/2011 11:38:33 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GreenAccord

“No one in North Korea believes it’s their duty to bring about the arrival of the 12th Imam. And this is not an hysterical claim.”

And what will any of the current crop of RINOs do about Iran? How are they going to stop them? Face facts, the most that they’ll do is blow a lot of hot air about it but basically do exactly nothing, just like they did in North Korea. At least RP is honest about it. No matter who gets elected you’ll be seeing a nuclear capable Iran before the decade is out.


72 posted on 12/29/2011 11:39:06 AM PST by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: E.K. Crossbow
"He is probably the most honest person running!"

Honest and insane are not mutually exclusive.

73 posted on 12/29/2011 11:39:45 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bgill

any suggestions?


74 posted on 12/29/2011 11:40:36 AM PST by donmeaker (e is trancendentall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

I am on a conservative web-site supporting a constitutional platform and a Republican Primary candidate: does that make me a troll here?


75 posted on 12/29/2011 11:43:05 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

As I say, Ron Paul is the nut can that is best kept closed.


76 posted on 12/29/2011 11:45:43 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

I’m still convinced Ron Paul would be a better choice over Mitt Romney if it came down to a choice between the two.

I’m not gung-ho about Paul’s foreign policy, but as far I’m concerned, the Federal Government by far the most eminent threat to the safety and security of this country than any foreign power is.

Romney isn’t serious about reining in Fedzilla, so he’s a non-starter for me (aside from the fact that he’s a sham of a man with no real convictions).


77 posted on 12/29/2011 11:46:38 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: TheNewPatriot

Hey! I want my legalized crack and heroin!!


79 posted on 12/29/2011 11:52:25 AM PST by citizen (Don't blow it, Iowa! R Paul may be saving his lump-of-coal present til the spring: A 3rd party run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Hey! I want bigger Government!!


80 posted on 12/29/2011 11:53:33 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

RoPaul wouldn’t even be a better choice over Barack Obama.


81 posted on 12/29/2011 11:53:52 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
I’m not gung-ho about Paul’s foreign policy, but as far I’m concerned, the Federal Government by far the most eminent threat to the safety and security of this country than any foreign power is.

This is my belief as well.
82 posted on 12/29/2011 11:55:05 AM PST by Gennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
When has Dr. Paul suggested gutting our military?

He wants to cut our military in half. He says one submarine is suitable to patrol our entire eastern coast. He wants to experiment with allowing perverts in the military. What more could he do?

Again. The Ron Paul foreign policy/defense strategy is a 21st Century manifestation of the Washington/Jefferson foreign policy.

Washington did not want gays in the military. In the 18th century our enemies could not launch a missile strike that could destroy us in a matter of minutes.
Cut and Run may be living in the 18th century, but the rest of us are living in the 21st.
83 posted on 12/29/2011 11:55:33 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

“Conservatism is about ideas, not just kicking people to the curb when they think 1% differently and agree on 99%”

The problem there is that Ron Paul is NOT a conservative. He is a libertarian and a racist crackpot libertarian at that. The focus of this site is to “further conservatism in America”. Ron Paul and his racist, anti-Israel, isolationism, blame America, support traitors, ignore radical nation nukes, sympathize with the OWS parasites, Alex Jones participation, pandering to fringe groups, and more is NOT “furthering conservatism in America”.


84 posted on 12/29/2011 11:55:46 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Right, it’s no big deal that Iran gets a Nuke and Paul said they have every right to have one. (That way they will force the big bad bully USA to “negotiate” with them for a change, instead of attacking them.)

You must be one brain dead idiot to believe that all that matters is we reign in the Fed. and what is going on in the ME is trivial.


85 posted on 12/29/2011 11:57:02 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

It is conservative to be world police and military subsidizer when there are a host of enemy who attack us around the world, attack our friends and allies, and who try to destabilize self governing countries.

With 8 billion people in the world, we need to do things efficiently. One way to do things efficiently is to trade, using price signals and personal experience of quality to aid our choices of what to do, and when to do it.

Trade requires transport. Transport requires some degree of security against caravan raiders (as Mohammed was), pirates (as the Barbary pirates were). The problem is not new. The problem of piracy in the Mediterranean was not resolved until the French went into Algeria, the Spanish went into Morocco, the Italians went into Libya, and the English went into Egypt.

The Knights Templar partially resolved caravan raiders by developing financial transactions that would take pilgrims money at the start of the trip, and return it to them at the end, so during the trip, there was nothing to steal. Caravan raiding became a all loss, no gain proposition. Caravan raiders then sold themselves to Saladin, who was resolved to kill the goose if he couldn’t help himself to the eggs.

It is an old problem.


86 posted on 12/29/2011 11:57:27 AM PST by donmeaker (e is trancendentall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: trapped_in_LA

Great post........


87 posted on 12/29/2011 11:58:02 AM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Agree, he cannot become our President.


88 posted on 12/29/2011 11:59:46 AM PST by Coffee_drinker (The best defense is a strong preemptive strike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

I have heard the racist attack, but I haven’t heard any actual racist stuff from him, can you give a quote (admin this is just a question, I want to know, please don’t delete my account)


89 posted on 12/29/2011 12:00:17 PM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Kinzua
I am on a conservative web-site supporting a constitutional platform and a Republican Primary candidate: does that make me a troll here?

I could have sworn you were supporting Cut and Run.
90 posted on 12/29/2011 12:00:53 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Funny, that’s what I said about “President Obama.”

As Romney said: Hell yes, I’ll vote for Paul over Obama.

Not that I can’t think of a bunch of people I’d vote for before Paul.

And who cares about Paul’s “racist newspapers” when Obama was sitting in “Reverend” Wright’s den of hate for years?


91 posted on 12/29/2011 12:01:18 PM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
All you Ron Paul supporters, you are obviously one digit short of a normal IQ or have a single digit IQ.

Now that's the way to win friends and influence people...

92 posted on 12/29/2011 12:04:24 PM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

So we need 11 carrier groups because of the barbary pirates? I don’t follow.

I just don’t get the fear of countries across the world, when we have opened our borders and are actively encouraging a foreign invasion from the south. Countries thousands of miles away don’t scare me as much as the Mexican invasion does.

I don’t know what Paul says about that- that is my own opinion. Please don’t delete my account if I am agreeing with Paul.


93 posted on 12/29/2011 12:05:33 PM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: John D

What do you consider to be the correct alternative to what you call Cut and Run?

If it involves increasing our foreign deployments do you have any concerns that America may have difficulty financing these?

Should/would financial concerns limit in any way our choice of international military operations?


94 posted on 12/29/2011 12:05:47 PM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
I’m not gung-ho about Paul’s foreign policy, but as far I’m concerned, the Federal Government by far the most eminent threat to the safety and security of this country than any foreign power is. Romney isn’t serious about reining in Fedzilla,

Do you really think the surrender monkey is? He has been in Washington for over a quarter century. Can you name one thing he has ever done to rein in spending? The only thing he has ever accomplished is acquiring the most earmarks of any candidate running. That is not reining in spending.
95 posted on 12/29/2011 12:06:01 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; TheNewPatriot; Admin Moderator
Seriously, you should see post 11.

I can forgive Jim for his myopia on this issue. However, he hasn't repealed the FR policy against personal attacks, and just because Jim engages on it from time to time doesn't give anyone else license to ignore it.

You don't like Ron Paul? Fine, neither do I. But, if you choose to post a screed about why you don't like Ron Paul, concentrate on Ron Paul, rather than attacking or insulting his supporters.

The same goes for supporters of Perry, Gingrich, Romney, or any other of the assortment of nuts currently campaigning for the Republican nomination.

If you want to attack someone else, I'd suggest you start with the Republican party leadership that couldn't recruit a candidate that can defeat the most unpopular President in recent memory.

96 posted on 12/29/2011 12:06:29 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

The Racist newsletters were just brought up to illustrate where the main attacks will come from in the MSM.

But more importantly, Paul’s belief that Iran has every right to have nuclear weapons is just plain, well, you know, kind of sort of nutty, INSANE AND ILLOGICAL, like Paul’s belief that 9/11 was an inside job!

But why do we have to keep explaining that to your kind?


97 posted on 12/29/2011 12:07:46 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

I’m not a RoPaul supporter.

Those who are, tend to swing strongly to the Libertarian side.
The success of RoPaul can be laid at the failure of other R candidates
to address some of the deep-seated issues that are undermining our
country...

Loss of Privacy
Rise of the police state
Devaluation of our dollar and monetary system
Overwhelming debt
Military bases in more than 100 countries
etc.

If someone on our side doesn’t care about these things and
carry the flag for them, there will be a third party run
that undermines the R candidate in the general election.

RoPaul supporters are essentially the libertarian version
of the tea party. They will either be satisfied enough that
their issues are paid attention to and vote R or they will
be disillusioned and go elsewhere.


98 posted on 12/29/2011 12:08:17 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E.K. Crossbow
He is probably the most honest person running!

There are lots of honest nuts and crazy people around. What has that got to do with anything? Because they are honest about their loony ideas doesn't make them any better.

but I tell you Ron Paul is not as off base as you folks want to make him out. If you do a little research into what he has said you will find a great deal of sound reasoning behind it.

The more research one does, the more apparent it is Ron Paul is a wackadoodle. Do you think it is within the realm of sane for a presidential candidate to speak in support of the traitor Bradley Manning? Do you think it is reasonable for Paul to associate himself with truther crackpots and further suggest that 9-11 may have been an inside job? Do you think it is reasonable to suggest that we can't build a barrier along the southern border because it may be used to keep American's from fleeing......to Mexico? These are just some of the bizarre things Ron Paul has expressed - the list really goes on and on.

99 posted on 12/29/2011 12:09:14 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

Just read his newsletters and you will find the answer to your question. For decades he published them with his name in big bold letters across the top, hired the people to put them out, had name as editor in the box at the bottom, collected the proceeds from them, and fifteen years ago stated that they were his.


100 posted on 12/29/2011 12:09:31 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson