Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Ready to Hear All About Rick Santorum and Universal Health Services
Red State ^ | December 31, 2011 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 12/31/2011 2:33:41 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

The media is about to begin the vetting of Rick Santorum and I suspect we’re going to hear a lot about Universal Health Services (“UHS”). Santorum’s involvement in UHS is one of the significant bits of his private sector experience.

After his 18 point loss in 2006, UHS appointed Rick Santorum to its Board of Directors.

On May 16, 2007, Santorum acquired 10,000 options to purchase Class B common stock. On November 21, 2009, he received another option for 5,000. In 2010, it was options for 15,000 shares and another 15,000 as recently as January 21, 2011, as Santorum begin to entertain thoughts of running for President.

On June 15, 2011, Santorum resigned from the board of UHS.

Here’s why the media will be interested.

On March 2, 2010, nearly three years after Santorum was appointed to the UHS board of directors, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint against UHS for billing Medicaid for “inpatient psychiatric care that was not provided.” The company received Medicaid funds to provide psychiatric counseling and treatment to boys ages 11 to 17.

According to the Department of Justice, UHS “[took] advantage of troubled children in order to feed their own desire for wealth.”

On July 29, 2010, an employee of the same Virginia adolescent psychiatric facility that was sued by DOJ filed suit against UHS for reprisal against her due to her “investigation of, reporting of, opposition to and refusal to participate in, her employer?s blatant and systemic criminal fraud against Medicaid engaged in by defendants[.]” See Barbara Jones v. Universal Health Services, Inc.

According to Barbara Jones, the whistleblower who brought suit against UHS, local company management encouraged employees to conduct “drive by therapy sessions” as they passed patients in the hallway and then record the brief interactions as a thirty minute individual therapy sessions to be billed to Medicaid. Jones also testified in her court filings that she was ordered by the local CEO to fabricate a Medicaid billing form and was told, after she refused to do so, that she would not be paid until the form was fabricated.

UHS tried to have the complaint dismissed not because of the veracity of the changes, but because it claimed Barbara Jones wasn’t an employee of UHS and therefore was not protected under a whistle blower statute.

Santorum possibly did not know about any of this, but in 2007 the federal government filed a lawsuit against UHS for Medicaid fraud going back all the way to 2004 — or well before Santorum was on the board. It’s kind of hard to claim complete ignorance of federal charges against a company on whose board he sat for over four years.

This is going to be an interesting vetting process, done even more rapidly than the vetting of Mike Huckabee back in 2008, if only because the media probably correctly thinks Santorum doesn’t have the staying power Huck had, so they want to get it all done quickly.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: healthcare; insider; medicade; santorum2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last
Rick Santorum says Arlen Specter is an important member of the Bush team [:37]
1 posted on 12/31/2011 2:33:48 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rick Perry on Congressional Insider Trading [:24]

******************

Nov. 13, 2011: “Pelosi fires back at ‘60 Minutes’ report on ‘soft corruption’”

“Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, according to CBS. They bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44; two days later, shares were trading at $64, CBS said.”.......... Source

Pelosi Bashes Catholics: 'They Have This Conscience Thing'... “After having some of her behind the scenes shenanigans exposed, Nancy Pelosi has turned to her friends in the MSM to help her with damage control. The effect is something akin to watching what scrambles out after you overturn a large rock.

Pelosi sought to defend herself from allegations that she and her husband made millions from insider trading in what the Washington Post calls a wide ranging interview……..

……Pelosi added a startling, if inadvertent, admission. Addressing the effects such [ObamaCare] legislation would have on Catholic health care providers, Pelosi said:

"I'm a devout Catholic and I honor my faith and love it . . . but they have this conscience thing."…….

2 posted on 12/31/2011 2:34:27 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Egads, that’s one ugly pic of Pelosi, and that’s sayin’ something.


3 posted on 12/31/2011 2:36:25 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Is it really time to go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Two claim Gingrich lobbied in ’03
4 posted on 12/31/2011 2:38:55 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

It’s pure Pelosi.


5 posted on 12/31/2011 2:40:33 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Video of Rick Santorum eagerly defending earmarks on FOX News program in 2009
6 posted on 12/31/2011 2:45:09 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

WATERLOO, Iowa – Texas Gov. Rick Perry demanded former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, whom he dubbed a “prolific earmarker” yesterday, explain his support of earmarks for pet projects, including a teapot museum and an indoor rainforest.

“Senator Santorum, just to get a little more specific here, please tell me why you asked taxpayers to support the bridge to nowhere in Alaska. Why did you ask the taxpayers of Iowa to support a teapot museum in North Carolina, an indoor rainforest in Iowa, and the mountain sheep institute, Montana sheep institute? Why were those important enough for you to vote for?” Perry said to more than 100 people crowded into two rooms at Doughy Joey’s Peetza- Joint.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/perry-demands-santorum-explain-earmarks-for-teapot-museum-indoor-rainforest/


7 posted on 12/31/2011 2:47:53 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Really, this is the worst that they have. That Santorium had a board position (Read meet once a quarter for a couple of hours to rubber stamp management decisions)on a company that was being sued by the government. Of course, our Current President was employed by an openly criminal organization (ACORN) and that’s not a disqualifier. But the fact that Santorium had a largely cerimonial position at a company that also employed some doctor or clerk somewhere that may or may not have billed medicare improperly at some time in the past makes him unfit for office.

Putting up with this double standard is why every conservative gets thrown under the bus, while the media users the unelectable RINO’s like Romney to the front of the line.


8 posted on 12/31/2011 2:48:05 AM PST by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Santorum appears to be a piker in crony capitalism compared to Perry or the cash-in-on-political-influence business compared to Newt, but yes, this stinks.

The only reason companies put former pols on their boards is for shielding from government shakedowns or demands, at best, and corruption at worst—as appears to be the case here.


9 posted on 12/31/2011 2:49:04 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“If you look at the Constitution, the Constitution gives the power of the purse to Congress; the Congress is the one that’s supposed to spend the money,” Santorum said on Fox News. “So the idea that earmarks is somehow against the Constitution or something that is illicit, that the congressman can or shouldn’t do is simply, factually incorrect.”

He was pressed as to whether the practice should still be encouraged, even if it weren’t illegal, because of the public’s perception that earmarking contributes to corruption in Washington.

“I’ve defended my earmarks in the sense that I’m proud of the money that I did set aside for things that were priorities in my state instead of having bureaucrats do that,” Santorum said. “But I’ve recognized that the American public have sort of seen this as a pox upon the congress and that’s where the American public is today and as a president, it’s sort of easy for me to say I’ll oppose congressional earmarks.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2826467/posts


10 posted on 12/31/2011 2:50:46 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
The case for Perry’s venture capitalismThere’s a big difference between the Texas and statist approaches - There has been a lot of debate about Gov. Rick Perry’s economic development funds. The criticism centers on the idea that the Texan’s funds create a “Solyndra problem” for him, that by investing in businesses that bring jobs to the state, Mr. Perry has the same job-creation approach President Obama displayed in backing federal loans to a solar-energy firm.

Equating the two men in this way provides a convenient symmetry, but it’s also a false comparison that misses why many free marketers are comfortable with Gov. Perry even while critical of Solyndra.”……

11 posted on 12/31/2011 2:51:59 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

And you think getting out in front of slamming Santorum will help your guy, Perry?


12 posted on 12/31/2011 2:52:19 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

you know what,, the media is pushing Santorum in Iowa.. it means zippo people.. they want to dilute the Gingrich vote where it really matters to defeat Romney.. in SC.. Iowa means nothing anymore.. SC is the first real primary that will pick the next nominee


13 posted on 12/31/2011 2:52:33 AM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I like Rick Santorum.


14 posted on 12/31/2011 2:54:10 AM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
....But the fact that Santorium had a largely cerimonial position at a company ....

"On May 16, 2007, Santorum acquired 10,000 options to purchase Class B common stock. On November 21, 2009, he received another option for 5,000. In 2010, it was options for 15,000 shares and another 15,000 as recently as January 21, 2011, as Santorum begin to entertain thoughts of running for President. "

15 posted on 12/31/2011 2:54:56 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Free marketers that are comfortable with Perry’s approach likely were donating to his campaigns—and had investments in the companies he was pouring taxpayer cash into.


16 posted on 12/31/2011 2:57:56 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Give me your facts.


17 posted on 12/31/2011 3:06:09 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

You’ve seen the articles. Perry has used Texas startup funding in the same way that Obama has used green startup funding—to reward donors.


18 posted on 12/31/2011 3:10:03 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Show me your facts.


19 posted on 12/31/2011 3:15:04 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
You can start here
20 posted on 12/31/2011 3:21:08 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Here are more bread crumbs:


21 posted on 12/31/2011 3:24:20 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Bump for later


22 posted on 12/31/2011 3:30:35 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
A Fox Guarding the Hen House is like asking a Congressman to fix Washington [:31]

Game Show Ad:Wheel of Washington [1:01]

23 posted on 12/31/2011 3:41:29 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
And you think getting out in front of slamming Santorum will help your guy, Perry?

You think this isn't going to be public????

You KNOW it will.

24 posted on 12/31/2011 3:43:19 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Obama is sitting back laughing his ass off while we kill of our own candidates.

He is taking a 4 million dollar vacation in Hawaii,enjoying the sun and fun while do his job for him in ruining the chances of our candidates to beat him.

The worst President in the history of America, the man who should be beaten by a landslide, and he will go back into the WH to finish us off, because we have self destructed.


25 posted on 12/31/2011 4:43:23 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Obama will have $1BILLION in his war chest. You don’t think he doesn’t have all this information at his fingertips.

We need to pick the candidate that can stand and look Obama in the eye and tell him where to get off — not choose a candidate with dirty hands:

Romney — HEALTH CARE in MA — Environmentally weak

Gingrich — FREDDIE MAC and health care - Environmentally weak

Santorum — Earmarks up the wazoo and HEALTH CARE — ENDORSED Romney in ‘08.


26 posted on 12/31/2011 5:03:44 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

No, Obama wants the GOP to run unvetted candidates so he can blow them out of the water after it’s too late. The only people against “negative campaigning” are the candidates with something to hide that should be flipping burgers anyway.


27 posted on 12/31/2011 5:14:31 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
"Really, this is the worst that they have."

No, there's also that dumb Accuweather bill (which was properly excoriated here on FR at the time), but since I don't think Santorum's a viable candidate...

28 posted on 12/31/2011 5:24:35 AM PST by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I like your guy Perry a helluva a lot more than Rick Santorum. My assessment of Santorum is he's a sanctimonious, inside-the-Beltway jerk. In 2002, Pat Toomey had Arlen Specter beaten in the GOP primary, until Santorum and George Bush carried Specter over the finish line. Specter then showed his true colors 5 years later by switching parties to avoid the next GOP election.

The more people see of Santorum, the more he's disliked. In 2004, he lost his reelection bid by 19 points. 19 points! For an incumbent! That's unheard of. I would much rather see the Governor of Texas get a 2nd look than see Rick Santorum.

29 posted on 12/31/2011 5:28:25 AM PST by Big E
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Gad I wish I'd read the thread before replying...maybe the Admin can provide a new title...

"Monkey Who Fling Perry Poo Be Sh!t Out Of Luck In 83 Hours"

30 posted on 12/31/2011 5:31:16 AM PST by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Looks like Rick in next in line for ‘whack a mole’


31 posted on 12/31/2011 5:37:31 AM PST by duckman (Herman 2012 was Zero's worst night mare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Santorum — Earmarks up the wazoo and HEALTH CARE — ENDORSED Romney in ‘08.

I know you're attempting to promote your candidate by attacking others, and that's fine...it's part of our process. But, while I disagree with your synopsis, the endorsement part reminds me of the old saying, "those who live in glass houses....."

Didn't Gov. Perry work for Al Gore (as a Democrat) and didn't Gov. Perry endorse Rudy Giuliani in the 2008 Presidential election?

Good luck with your effort.

32 posted on 12/31/2011 5:39:04 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Big E
As a member of a political party, it's almost impossible not to support the senior Senator (from your own party within your own state. Almost all Republican office holders (including “W”) were actively supporting Specter.

As for the 2006 (not 2004) Senate defeat, almost all Republicans were trounced in PA in that election. Given the unpopularity of “W” and the name recognition that Casey had (being the son of a former King of PA), I don't think any Republican on the planet could have even run close.

One thing about that 2006 campaign, I watched it closely and don't recall Santorum ever vacillating from his Conservative views, unlike other politicians I know.

33 posted on 12/31/2011 5:54:30 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
You are correct. The elite Republican establishment, the inside the Beltway crowd, is at best DemocRat lite and at worst, willing co-conspirators. They give us candidates they like (Dole, W, McCain, Romney, Gingrich, et. al) while the candidates we want, the core values conservatives, which this elite Republican establishment hates, loathes, and despises with their utmost venomous vitriol, are never supported, let alone considered. They hate grass roots support from the little people. Our error, good friends, was not forming a third party immediately after the 2010 election and promoting it as hard and as fervently as we did the TEA party. Instead of erecting a big tent, I suggest we erect a tent that encapsulates conservative, Constitutional, common sense beliefs without the attendant political BS and attract those who want to join us in putting this nation back on a free market, capitalist, Freedom and Liberty path instead of this Communist gulag we are headed to.
34 posted on 12/31/2011 6:01:49 AM PST by cashless (Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
...but yes, this stinks.
No, it doesn't. The only thing that stinks is your woeful attempt at logic.
The only reason companies put former pols on their boards is for shielding from government shakedowns or demands, at best, and corruption at worst
No, it is not. It is, and always has been, for connections to either investors or customers.
as appears to be the case here.
Do you really, honestly, think that the UHS board and senior management are involved in the day-to-day management of some psychiatric facility which is probably one of 20 facilities (read 5%) in a less than 10% growth business unit for UHS and whose entire business unit represents probably less than 5% of its gross income (and that may be incredibly generous)?
35 posted on 12/31/2011 6:09:42 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

What are Santorum’s accomplishments? The salient issue in this election is jobs. What is Santorum’s record re job creation?

For that matter, what other candidates besides Romney or Perry have solid records as job creators?

This is important because it hits Obama where is the most vulnerable.


36 posted on 12/31/2011 6:11:39 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
The problem I have with Santorum is that only two weeks ago, it was reported that Bob Vander Plaats attempted to get Santorum to help raise 1 million dollars to help BVP (The Family Leader) promote Santorum.

I believe it happened and the disturbing part is that Santorum's story changed.

In my mind, Santorum is forever tarnished with the fact he changed his story and the press failed to follow up.

37 posted on 12/31/2011 6:42:09 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Obama is laughing his ass off while we kill off our own candidates."

"Conservatives" take strong candidates, submit them to the witches' dunking booth, find the nailmarks missing from both hands and feet, then call for the lynching rope.

Liberals take a weak candidate, put nailmarks in his hands and feet with a magic marker, proclaim him messiah, then wink at each other and vote.

38 posted on 12/31/2011 6:47:17 AM PST by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Erik Erickson is a lying backstabber and is no friend of conservatives. He has systematically picked apart every CONSERVATIVE that was in this race.

Santorum and Bachmann are much better than the other candidates who are actively campaigning.


39 posted on 12/31/2011 6:58:26 AM PST by justsaynomore (#writeincain https://www.facebook.com/groups/wrtieincain/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Free marketers that are comfortable with Perry’s approach likely were donating to his campaigns—and had investments in the companies he was pouring taxpayer cash into.

If you're referring to the Texas Enterprise Fund, the Governor of Texas doesn't have the power to allocate those funds.

40 posted on 12/31/2011 7:01:31 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
We need to pick the candidate that can stand and look Obama in the eye and tell him where to get off — not choose a candidate with dirty hands:

Perry: Gives ILLEGAL ALIENS tax payer money - soft on ILLEGAL ALIENS

Signs an executive order that provides his pals at Merck an exclusive drug contract with Texas by having young girls take a pill that promotes promiscuity - under the table payoffs from his boys at Merck {but perrywinkles call them campaign contributions}.

Wifey, if you want to slam the pubbie candidates it's OK with me, but don't even pretend that the Texas clodhopper with an IQ of room temperature has clean hands.

He's as crooked as any politician, he just steals with a Texas drawl, and it makes you feel better.

41 posted on 12/31/2011 7:16:26 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought; Cincinatus' Wife; altura

These old saws against Rick Perry have been thoroughly vetted. Ad nauseum.

I know what I’m talking about here...I am Texan through and through and have lived the same Texas political history as Rick Perry.

The entire state of Texas was solid Democrat for most of its history. Certain parts were more dug in Democrat than others, among them the rural area Perry came from. You didn’t even have Republican options there to vote for, until fairly recently in that history.

The brand of Democrat was not the same as a northeastern liberal Democrat. Nowadays the Pelosi type Democrat is so foreign to these people’s beliefs and values it’s like different solar systems, not just different planets.

Perry tried to pick the best of the bad lot of Dems that year. I believe Dick Gephardt was running, and Dukakis.

People say algore was already showing lib tendencies when Perry backed him, but that is not how Perry had read Gore’s record. He saw him as the most conservative of those Dems running.

When Dukakis won the nomination, Perry voted for George HW Bush for President. He had already cast his Presidential vote for Ronald Reagan twice.

Endorsing Rudy was to keep from endorsing either McCain or Romney. He believed, and correctly, that Rudy would be the best leader in the War on Terrorism, of those who were running. He extracted a pledge, the man’s personal word, that he would appoint strict constructionist judges to the Supreme Court and would not seek to change any pro life policies that the GOP had put in place.

I wish he had not endorsed anyone from the terrible choices we had, but his choice was a thinking outside the box choice that was defensible given the options.

Santorum’s much ballyhooed social conservatism should have kept him from endorsing Romney, in my opinion. The best choice for him was probably no choice, but Romney is a bad pick.

I said the same about Herman Cain’s Romney endorsement, and for crying out loud, Jim DeMint even endorsed Romney.


42 posted on 12/31/2011 7:25:51 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought; Cincinatus' Wife

Are Santorum’s actions and statements via earmarks conservative?

Recall that the greatest issue we face is downsizing the federal government and getting spending under control and paying down the debt.

Making the federal government as inconsequential in your lives as I can make it...to quote Rick Perry’s pledge if elected.

Perry called earmarks “the gateway drug” to out of control spending.

If you look into it, if you study it, you would draw the same conclusion.

It isn’t the cocaine or the heroin of our fiscal crisis, but it’s the marijuana and the alcohol that lead to it.

If you defend your own earmarks and are proud of them, then you cannot cricicize anyone else’s earmarks. Every Congressman and Senator has to be given that same pass.

And why is someone the conservatives love to villify, Speaker Boehnor, personally opposed to earmarks and has never put one in a bill?

If Boehnor...and there are a few others...can resist earmarking and will not defend it, why can’t Santorum resist earmarking and not defend it?

Someone coined a description of Santorum as a Big Government Social Conservative.

Could have a point there...


43 posted on 12/31/2011 7:41:20 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Big E
.....I would much rather see the Governor of Texas get a 2nd look than see Rick Santorum.

The MSM needs to get an earful about their coverage of Rick Perry!

Bump!!

44 posted on 12/31/2011 7:59:47 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
Perry: Gives ILLEGAL ALIENS tax payer money - soft on ILLEGAL ALIENS

How so? If you're referring to instate tuition, they are not getting taxpayer funded money. They are paying the instate tuition rate b/c they have been living here, graduated a Texas high school, and have been paying taxes into the Texas system. They have to secure their own funding. All said, this group makes up 1% of the admissions in Texas schools.

As for your claim that he's soft on immigration, Gov. Perry has done more than any of the other candidates combined in combating the problem we have. The federal government has a constitutional requirement to deal with this, and it has refused. Therefore, Gov. Perry has allocated an ass load of Texas taxpayer money (money that doesn't grow on trees, mind you, b/c we have to balance our budget every 2 years) to help deal with this problem. He signed a bill into law that requires ID to vote, and heavily pushed this past year to get the legislature to end the sanctuary city problem. He has personally confronted Barack Obama to deal with this issue. There's a nice photo out there of Perry handing Obama a formal written request. Mitt Romney hasn't done this. Ron Paul hasn't done this. Michelle Bachmann hasn't done this. Rick Santorum hasn't done this. Huntsman hasn't done this. Herman Cain never did this. Sarah Palin never did this. Newt Gingrich never did this. Barack Obama never did this. Joe Biden never did this. And when the others talk about building a nonstop wall right in the the smack middle of the Rio Grande, anyone with any knowledge whatsoever of the geography of the Texas border knows that it's a pipe dream.

Signs an executive order that provides his pals at Merck an exclusive drug contract with Texas by having young girls take a pill that promotes promiscuity - under the table payoffs from his boys at Merck {but perrywinkles call them campaign contributions}.

Your issue seems to be that he chose Merck over another company. What other company should Perry have chosen? He couldn't have chosen another company at the time b/c no other company made the vaccine. However, the CDC recommended the vaccine, and Gov. Perry signed an executive order for the vaccine that stated you didn't have to take the vaccine if you didn't want to.

As for you suggesting a quid pro quo with Merck, do you have proof that the Governor of Texas or Merck conducted a quid pro quo? Post hoc ergo propter hoc doesn't cut it.

45 posted on 12/31/2011 8:01:00 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Exactly — the slippery slope.


46 posted on 12/31/2011 8:06:12 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth

Ditto that!!


47 posted on 12/31/2011 8:07:50 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

And so the conservative destruction of good candidates continues. We are beginning to deserve a second Obama term, if not earn one.


48 posted on 12/31/2011 8:08:17 AM PST by Chandalier (Perfect is the enemy of good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chandalier

I’m working to get a good conservative elected — Rick Perry.

How and what are you doing in the GOP primarey to elect a conservative?

Do you have a choice? Have you been running from one to another?


49 posted on 12/31/2011 8:11:40 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I’m working to get a good conservative elected — Rick Perry.

Then promote your candidate instead of bashing other conservatives who are ahead of Perry.

50 posted on 12/31/2011 8:18:28 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson