Skip to comments.Real Truth About 9/11 (Not what you think)
Posted on 01/11/2012 2:55:30 PM PST by Ben Barrack
Terrorist welcomed in the Oval Office and the Real Truth about 9/11
Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack
If the government has Ten Commandments, the game of politics, not homeland security, would be at the top of the list. Eager to play the game, the Obama Administration pulled out of Iraq in time for Christmas as it welcomed Irans puppets into the Oval Office. The Iraqi delegation, headed by Nouri al-Maliki, included a conspirator in Irans terror campaignsthe Iraqi Minister of Transportation, Hadi al-Ameri.
To quash the voices of survivors and victims families who linked al-Ameri to American deaths in the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, the Obama administration replied, There is no evidence of Hadi al-Ameris involvement in any act of violence against U.S. Citizens.
However, when dots are connected, they point to al-Ameri being an Iranian agenta first-class terrorist. Ten days after al-Ameris visit to the White House, US District Judge George B. Daniels signed a 53 page document in Havlish v. Iran that included 276 Statements of Fact and 35 Conclusions of Law in his ruling that the 9/11 attacks were the result of an Iran-Hezbollah-al Qaeda alliance. The document showed one Abolghasem Mesbahiwho had defected years earlier after receiving a tip from a colleague that he was on the regimes kill list while working for Irans Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS)testified that MOIS gave material support to Hezbollah. His credible testimony included three coded messages he received in the weeks leading up to the 9/11 attacks from contacts he had inside Iran.
The case revealed that Imad Mughniyah, once Irans notorious Hezbollah leader, was involved in coordinating and facilitating the 9/11 attacks and committed numerous terrorist operations against American citizens. He cracked the FBIs Most Wanted list for twenty-one years but al-Ameris terrorist rap sheet...
(Excerpt) Read more at shoebat.com ...
This would’ve mattered in 2001. After ten years of war in Afghanistan and eight in Iraq I don’t think most people will care to connect the dots, even if it is true. And, even if it is true, no end of people will openly deny it being true because it undoes their tin-foil 9/11 conspiracies about how the Jews/Masons/Jesuits/aliens/Bush/Republicans/Democrats/clowns did it.
Islam is the reason for 9/11. Not ‘’radical Islam’’. Islam, pure and simple.
One shouldn’t need to connect any dots. The question posed should be why are ANY Iranian scumbags allowed in the Oval Office at ANY time?!?
Damn right. There is no ‘moderate’ islam. ALL of islam is a third century death cult. To sad to many Americans buy into this ‘moderate’ islam crap. Note: (i)slam....no caps for this bunch of carpet flyin’, diaper headed, mellon choppers.
It should, but it would kill the US Government’s line that we’re not really at war with anyone, least of all, any muslim countries.
The US government refuses to admit that we’ve been in a defacto state of war with Iran since 1979... Funny how Iran and the rest of the muslim world seems to know it.
17 of the 19 Hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.
We had the 911 Commission no one said Iran was responsible.
Now all of a sudden Iran is responsible?
They are just figuring this thing out now??? This is after we kill OBL and Saddam Hussein???
Check out pages 240-241 of the 9/11 Commission Report. Hezbollah and Iran were identified as being culpable but only tangentially. Commission recommended USG follow-up. They never did. It took a private law firm 8 years to do USG’s job.
So Bush committed a fraud on us? Instead of attacking Iran, he used the opportunity to attack Iran's enemy Iraq? Interesting.
The frightened sheep will also support the establishment RINOs in the elections because they will be frightened into believing that the island nation of a few hundred people can take over the US if the Dims are elected.
So you have to ask yourself why did it take this long?
I hear you. (they’re 7th. century , ad 621, actually but who’s counting) Yeah, no caps. F ‘em, islam. I call’s ‘em what our Crusader ancestors called ‘em— ‘’Saracens’’. Saracens bastards.
I sure wish that J. Edgar Hoover was still alive and in control of the FBI!
Obama would have been deported at 1 year old.
And ALL his cronies would be “incarcerated”!
I know it is not a popular sentiment on a site like this, but it’s still true that even if Iran starts hostilities that too many Americans are still tired of war and the massive debts that have been racked up. By the way, I think Bush did the right thing in Iraq even if there were not WMDs. The no-fly zone thing was a mockery and if Bush hadn’t gone in we’d still be pussy-footing around over there.
I am just trying to understand why the neocon faction needed to be in Iraq if Iraq was not behind 9/11 attacks. Does it mean that the neocon faction run by Karl Rove has a right to grab others’ property? If that is the case, GOP cannot claim the moral high ground. I do not buy the claim about Iran planning 9/11. Iran is Shia. Iraq and Afghanistan were ruled by Sunnis. They hate each other. The RINOs need to stop fooling us in order to grab the property of the rest of the world.
I’m sufficiently convinced that Iraq was working on nuclear weapons prior to 2003 and I’m also convinced that GWB finished a job that his father really should have finished back in 1991. Iraq was causing problems and that needed to be resolved or else I think we would have seen a nuclear exchange between Iraq and Israel by now. With Iran it is much the same thing. If the USA permits Iran to construct nuclear weapons then I fully expect the Iranians to use them on Israel and to use them to blackmail Europe.
I’d like to see Iran dealt with right now while it’s easier to deal with them, but the reality, like I said, is that most Americans are tired of war and/or tired of the expense of war. Both factions are represented on the conservative side of the argument with the supporters of Ron Paul.
As to the RINO’s like Karl Rove I don’t think they are in this for empire, I think they’re making clever investments and then starting troubles in the world that serve the interests of those investments. It’s just market manipulation on a global scale for them.
Your claim about Europe does not stand as well. Europe has committed the greatest amount of terrorist acts. They even committed a genocide of Jews. It is the land of Hitler and Mussolini and the Catholics. Yes, USA is different from Europe because USA was made by people who fled the Catholics. No way I am voting for Romney, Santorum or Gingrich.
“What you say is just the party line.”
Sorry, no. I’ve come to my own conclusions on this topic. You don’t need to share my opinion but my opinion was not shaped by the GOP.
And you’ve lost me on the Catholic thing. Most Europeans fled Europe to escape their class system, to obtain the opportunity to own land, and to obtain the opportunity for liberties they would never (and still haven’t) have in Europe. The Catholic/Protestant thing probably got a lot of people to leave, no doubt, but both sides killed plenty of their own and no small amount of Catholics fled Catholic oppression all the same as no small amount of Protestants fled Protestant oppression.
Point of fact: Swiss Lutherans killed far more Swiss Baptists than Swiss Catholics ever did.
I guess it is just coincidence that your conclusions match the claims of the neocon RINOs.
I fail to grasp why my opinion of a closed matter is of any consequence at all. We’re no longer in Iraq, what’s done is done, and regardless of anyone’s opinion it shall not be undone.
You said “even if there were not WMDs”. Didn’t Saddam possess WMDs, as was stated? (Yes, I know “non compliance” was the key).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.