Skip to comments.Open Letter to Conservative Talk Radio Hosts (FR Exclusive)
Posted on 01/29/2012 1:58:53 PM PST by Danae
click here to read article
That’s cute, but you are the one who thinks there is no difference between Romney and Gingrich.
KUDOS Danae! You are so right.
I hear considerable conservative blustering about Obama’s philosophies, which are unAmerican but never really referenced as such. Newt talks about Saul Alinsky, Beck discusses socialism, and Rush and Hannity slather it on with similar oblique references.
But none of them are willing to address the root issue - WHY Obama was not raised to appreciate American culture, but rather to rebel and fight against it. It is exactly this kind of foreign influence which the Framers intended to preclude from the US Presidency by requiring “natural born Citizen” status.
But the national media, even the conservative wing of that industry, finds the subject taboo, even to the point of ignoring the fact that, as of 01/26/2012, a state court in Georgia has finally accepted testimony and evidence in a legitimate complaint that Barack Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as POTUS.
This event should have opened up a full discussion of the issue in the media, but instead we find a virtual syndicated news blackout. Even Drudge only carried a small blurb about it for a couple of hours, then - poof! - gone. Someone mentioned Obama’s Indonesian upbringing on Hannity recently and he shut it down to avoid “...getting me in trouble.”
My belief is that a treacherous deal was struck when then-Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton signed off on Senate Resolution 511, a non-binding agreement accepting John McCain as a natural born citizen, even though he was not born on US soil, because his parents (plural) were US citizens upon his birth. From that moment on, I believe the topic of Obama’s illegitimacy was off limits.
What’s the down side of breeching that contract at this point? It must be formidable to keep this issue in check for so long.
What’s the downside of keeping the agreement? It seems to me that Republicans and Democrats have conspired in this matter to the ruination of the Constitution, no less.
What could be worse than both major parties in cooperation against the US Constitution? This presents awesome challenges and responsibility incumbent on we citizens to overthrow this concerted attack on the Supreme Law of our land.
I wonder: Are we up to it?
“What could be worse than both major parties in cooperation against the US Constitution? This presents awesome challenges and responsibility incumbent on we citizens to overthrow this concerted attack on the Supreme Law of our land.”
I wonder the same thing often. I believe that both parties are now deliberately covering this up. The GOP knew about it before Obama was elected but could not do diddly about it because McCain had the same problem. So they screwed us. They are still screwing us, only now we do not have the constitution to protect us. The only hope I see is a massive number of citizens DEMANDING redress for this wrong, and I don’t see that happening either. Not enough people know or seem to care. Or they have bought into the Alynski BS and the mockery of the Birth Certificate - which was irrelevant from the get go.
We can’t give up though. I pray that Georgia is the crack in this seal of doom.
“Do people listen to talk radio?”
Is that a serious question?
Right, I missed it deliberately to piss you off.
Sheesh, come up with a cogent argument instead of throwing insults will you.
You must have missed my posting updates...
There IS a difference between Romney and Newt.
Newt HAS called himself a “progressive”.... That terminology sickens me. But, Newt also has a RECORD of controlling government spending.. and, of being willing to take the heat for it.
Both Romney and Newt have some culpability on supporting government run health care. But, Newt at least now says it’s a bad idea. Romney still thinks what he did in Mass was a good thing.
So... I’ll take Newt.
None of them want to talk about it. All of them change the subject faster than light. Even THEY mock it, either being deliberately stupid, or honestly ignorant.... which it is I am not sure.
Yes. They are paid entertainers and should not be taken seriously. I could really care less about what they blather about on talk radio.
Well, I sure would like to hear Hannity describe racism for what it is. A racist is a person who uses race as a means to an end. That goes for Obama, Michelle, Rev Wright, the entire Congressional Black Caucus, as well as other “Community leaders” like Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson et al.
I am SICK of seeing the black community used and abused by these racists who are part of the system which is keeping them poor and dependent.
Ugh. Its enough to drive one to despair.
You have a point about the entertainment bit. I agree.
Yet they pose as being members of the conservative constitutional movement. If they aren’t then we should give them no heed at all. That was sort of the point of my opus for what ever it’s worth.
Blang for later ....................................... FRegards
THanks for all your hard work. You are a true Patriot!
Thanks Godebert! DO NOT GIVE UP THE SHIP!!!
We cannot give up the fight!
You betcha Gonzo!
Have a great evening!
Yup, that is my experience when listening also. Although now I listen much less, because I just don’t trust the hosts the way I used to.
I just remembered that Peter Boyles at KHOW is a birther. I listened to his show this morning, he’s up to speed. He’s having Corsi on tomorrow.
I sent him an email that he read on air, asking if the big talkers have been threatened. He said he can’t speak for them.
RIGHT ON DUDE!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.