Posted on 02/07/2012 11:38:23 AM PST by Red Steel
@194 You have also shown an impressive ability to be wrong on every issue every time - for three years now.
Why, Harlan, how could a newbie like you have been following little old me for three long years?
First they sent out the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I thought OWS was right.
Then they sent out the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because my family were trade unionists.
Then they lied to the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they went after the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I was Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and tore me out of my Mother's womb.
With all due apologies to Pastor Martin Niemöller
I took the liberty of changing it to what I originally intended here.
No - just a small sampling was enough. Not much variety in your postings.
So - have you found any examples where your theories prevailed in court? Granted I didn’t look at all your post - perhaps I missed one.
“Yeah, I guess being more subtle was a necessity after being busted the first time trying to do it.”
Your are ascribing motives that may or may not be there.
The first several attempts (Bingham, Synder, Conyers) were all attempts to allow naturalized citizens to be President.
BTW, I read some time ago that the first attempts to change Presidental eligiblity occurred in the early 1800’s, I’ll try to locate that reference.
Have a good weekend.
Twist twist twist,
Afraid to admit you have backed a losing cause for so long? Don’t blame you.
Now, let's just dismiss the artistic merit or value of my replies and address your second stipulation.
You tell me how I am wrong on the issue of abortion.
Sorry for the confusion - you are absolutely right about abortion. I was referring to your view on Obama’s eligibility. That was the context of our discussion.
If I lied, then you can show me exactly where one of your predictions concerning a birther law suit panned out? Or where your theories on NBC prevailed in a real court of law? Sorry to bring the conversation back on track.
What does it have to do with birtherism?
You lie, blatantly, when it suits your needs!
You are a real piece of work.
You know I was talking about birtherism. Now answer my question. Prove me wrong. Show me where you were ever right. Simple challenge.
You claim to "know me" so well then YOU show ME a prediction I made that came out wrong.
And let's forget the damn birther law suit a minute. That issue apparently isn't settled by a damn sight so there's no sense in you jumping up and down and dancing a victory jig claiming a false victory!
You've qualified your comment...I share many of those sentiments.
Which sentiment do you not share?
And I want you to state publicly that I'm not wrong on the issue of abortion since you publicly lied and called me wrong on "every" issue.
I don't have to show you a thing. If you want to "throw something in my face" then you go find it and do so!
And if you can't then that is just one more strike against you.
Whereas I use humor to disarm an opponent you use dishonesty and outright lies to attempt to disparage them and cast aspersions against their character.
When I ask troubling questions that would automatically make your side of the argument look bad you attack through insinuation and innuendo, not with facts.
And you have the audacity to lecture me and state...@It always comes down to insults, doesn’t it?...when I post a humorous rejoinder and then you state the things about me that you have?! You've gone so far outside of the bounds of propriety that it's unfathomable.
You are not even worthy of one more moment of consideration in my book, much less deserving of any respect in a debate.
Good day, sir!
This may interest you:
"But Bruce Ledewitz, a professor for the Duquesne University School of Law for over 30 years, is not convinced.
"It doesn't matter," Ledewitz said. "Since the 1870s, we've treated people born here as citizens ... That's been the understanding."
Ledewitz was asked if Barchfeld's argument over the "natural born citizens" aspect holds any water.
"No," Ledewitz said. "And I'm not speaking about whether he's a good president or a bad president or anything else. It's just accepted law that people born in the United States are natural-born citizens. That's just been the understanding for a long time.
"It has nothing to do with Obama you understand. If you were born here, you're a natural-born citizen."
http://baldwin-whitehall.patch.com/articles/whitehall-man-is-aiming-to-remove-obama-from-pa-ballot#photo-8080552
I...wow.
[finishes bourbon]
On that note, I’m going to bed.
May there not be a head, horse or hog, therein.
Well, they just pulled it because I included links in the copy/paste of the article that ask for money.
But you can see here at ORYR
Attorney Larry Klayman To Take On Obama Ballot Access Challenges In Florida and California
You are right. I was too combative. I sometimes find myself arguing just for the sake of arguing.
In retrospect I went over the line and wish to offer an apology.
From now on every time I see your screen name on a thread you'll see this...
My apology was sincere. Is this issue that important that you would let it poison your heart? I will pray for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.