Posted on 02/14/2012 9:59:27 AM PST by cap10mike
Andrew Breitbart, the founder of popular conservative blogs Big Government, Big Hollywood, and many others was arguably the boldest speaker at the CPAC convention last week, and it was hard to miss the fact that he is cocked and ready for a fight . In fact, his own words, " F*** you - war." Breitbart released an explosive trailer for the upcoming project he is working on:
(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...
This trailer was playing up on the big screens in between speakers / panels at CPAC last week:
Andrew Breitbart's explosive new trailers
Scroll down slightly for video
LOVE it! Absolutely LOVE it! Woot!
Excellent...when Andrew Breitbart and Steve Bannon collaborate, expect great results!
I hope he can keep up the fight. (I wish, however, that he would not sink to their level with the foul language.)
[ I hope he can keep up the fight. (I wish, however, that he would not sink to their level with the foul language.) ]
The issue is the prevasive media has used foul language as a tool and it now equates as “being cool”. As I see it Breitbart is using the left’s own tools, one of them being the language against them.
Sorry, but I don’t see it that way; I see it as sinking to their level. Foul language is not really a “tool” IMO.
I’m willing to overlook that, considering the good he’s doing.
It’s a pathetic video that does our side no good. Some of it can be salvaged, but the f-bomb at the end wipes out all the good stuff.
Dynamic videos, nutmeg.
Breitbart is on a roll!
Andrew Breitbart, the King of All Media.
[ It’s a pathetic video that does our side no good. Some of it can be salvaged, but the f-bomb at the end wipes out all the good stuff. ]
I disagree, my dad, bless his soul told me something very poignant concerning foul language once, “A fool uses foul language all the time, A genius uses it only when appropriate.” It was appropriate, it was used as a challenge and as a way of saying “we won’t back down” in Breitbart’s video.
Finally!
It wasn't meant for you. It was meant for them in a language they understand.
I hear ya, and I tend to agree. However, I'm curious to see the entire movie (video?) when it's released to see just where he's going with it...
Foul language kind of WORKED in Marine Corps Boot Camp.
It does have its place.
These Occupy idiots are used to dealing with shrinking violets.
NO MORE!
[ but the f-bomb at the end wipes out all the good stuff.
It wasn’t meant for you. It was meant for them in a language they understand. ]
NAILED IT!!!!
They are used to Conservatives acting all “Mr. Rodgers” and being the polite ones so they can get away with acting like Occupy Scum. This was meant as a direct message to them to Shock the leftists and make them begin to realize that while they may have started the fight against our American Culture, We are damned well going to bring it to them and Finish it!
War needs to be declared on the media and they should be held accountable when they lie about, extort, and personally destroy anyone who doesn’t agree with their agenda. They should also be legally held to account when they conspire with the left. Excited to see Breitbart continuing to do what he does so well. Best of luck!
You have a point there... ;-)
Yes! :-)
[ Foul language kind of WORKED in Marine Corps Boot Camp.
It does have its place.
These Occupy idiots are used to dealing with shrinking violets.
NO MORE! ]
Foul Language has always been a form of 1st Amendment “Shock and Awe”. The left has owned it far too long and it is time to throw it BACK into their faces.
I’m not a big fan of the “F” bomb either. But there are times when you need a descriptive word that’s a little stronger than “shame on you Media”.
Love it! Well said...
[ War needs to be declared on the media and they should be held accountable when they lie about, extort, and personally destroy anyone who doesn’t agree with their agenda. They should also be legally held to account when they conspire with the left. Excited to see Breitbart continuing to do what he does so well. Best of luck! ]
With Faux News going down the liberal drain, I hope someday I can see the time when we see a “Breitbart News Channel”.
< LOA >No prisoners! < / LOA >
Excellent.
Been saying that about this board for years. It continues more and more into the sewer.
Yeah, I’m with you on the language - That’s their tactic, not ours
You got it!
Go Briebart!
The right has done it your way forEVER.
What do we get? Mitch McConnel and John Boehner.
You are done. Sign me on to Breitbart's f'ing army.
FU to the whack radical left! Smackdown with Breitbart!....Give ‘em hell!
oI appreciate the McConnel and Boehner statement. However, we ALSO got Allen West, who can make the same points with the same fire without the language.
Finally is right. You eventually reach the point where you say “Enough!”
I substitue FARK or FREEP. Either one drives the left into a howling moonbat rage.
I've been saying for many years that we need at least four conservative news channels. I've always wanted the Sirius Patriot Radio people to start their own TV network . . .
Bump for later ......................................... FRegards
Yes, foul language does have its place. And I have no bif a bunch of men want to let it fly among themselves, and I am sure there are situations in the military and in some stressful jobs where that helps them let off steam.
But I am a lady, and I just don’t want to hear it. As a woman, I feel it is my duty to uphold decent behavior and to encourage men to act like gentlemen. If we sink to their level, they have scored points, IMO.
I know many think this is just old-fashioned thinking and I must be out of touch. So be it.
I have no bif a bunch of men = I have no problem if a bunch of men
(Not sure what a “bif” is. Hope it’s not one of those kinds of words I am railing against. :)
One can be tough without being a potty mouth.
Well said. We have too many 24/7 Mr. Rogers-types representing us in Congress and in the media and it’s time that they started pushing back. I don’t use that language in my own life but I appreciate it when a Palin, a Breitbart, a Malkin and formerly a Coulter, would stand up for those of us without a mic.
Stuck in kindergarten, apparently.
Everything depends upon Breibart’s follow-through.
If it’s substantive, then he’s a Patton; if he’s all blow and no show, then he’s just another coarse careerist.
Damn, I’d like to be optimistic!
Or how about, "Bill Clinton, we have you surrounded, drop the ****ing cigar..."
Or "Sore m************g Loserman"?
Yep, I agree. I hope for our sake, he's a Patton...
I’m with you. I don’t want to hear it.
You got it. Although I’m a bit disappointed by the FU, on the other hand we’ve sat here and taken it for years from the left. Eventually we reach a breaking point and fight fire with fire. Give ‘em a taste of their own medicine.
No more Mr. Nice Guy! Gloves off!
Gloves off! War, baby!
I agree. The FU comment gave me a huge smile, but legal accountability is more productive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.