Skip to comments.ARPAIO: DOUBLE FRAUD! Obama birth certificate AND Selective Service card.
Posted on 03/02/2012 2:00:58 PM PST by geraldmcg
ARPAIO: DOUBLE FRAUD! Obama birth certificate AND Selective Service card.
I doubt if he’s any kind of US citizen. Plus has used a fake name/ID his whole life. Well, since he was a toddler.
I find this item particularly interesting:
Finally, the microfilm issue highlighted in the Sheriff Arpaio press conference.
One of the questions investigated by the Cold Case Posse revolved around possible entry into the U.S. by Obamas mother. Anyone entering the United States, citizen or foreigner, is required to fill out an official card through INS.
It is thought that, sometime within the first week of August 1961, Stanley Ann Dunham may have entered the United States from overseas bringing with her, a baby. Suspiciously missing from the INS records thus far investigated was that very week. Microfilm reel #184 shows only a couple of cards before that reel goes blank. Reel #185 picks up with August 8th 1961. Missing completely are August 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th, 1961.
1) When did that weeks record go missing?
2) Who removed that weeks record?
3) Why is it missing?
At this point, we have no idea when that single weeks portion of the INS microfilm record went missing. As to who was responsible, we can only guess it rises to a higher level than the DNC. While it would be relatively simple for the DNC to create forged documents to stand in for nonexistent documents, the INS is a federal bureau and missing records are far different from records which never existed...
(IMO he’s being kind to the myth, assuming the ‘removed’ record might be an entry into the US by Stanley Ann Dunham and a newborn...the age of the child isn’t governed by its arrival in the US, and the identity of the mother hasn’t been proven by any means...that I can see.)
Maybe the records are missing because Stanley Ann was accompanied by a two year old boy, instead of the mythical infant.
Maybe Stanley Ann Dunham didn’t meet zero until he showed up in photographs with her and Stanley Armour when zero was two years old?
Could you give me a link to somebody in the media who is making a big deal out of Joe not contacting the HDOH? I’d really love to hear what they’re saying.
Neither Joe nor Mike focused on it because it’s not directly related to whether Obama is eligible or not, but both did briefly imply that the HDOH itself is questionable.
If the media wants to get in this pissing match I will be happy to let them know some of the reasons why the HDOH’s word cannot be trusted. Just show me where the battle is and if they’ll actually let me post (highly unlikely) I’ll be on it.
Really need to do an article on this.
Interesting....coming to the full circle?
We had a lot of discussions here on the subject, by boat or by plane. SAD’s daddy at the dock, etc.??
We also had a guy exposing so much evidence in text, graphics and picture, but never seen him posting further since at least a year ago???
I was thinking of all the other folks that came into the us during that same time period.
Was wondering if they tried to get their records and couldn’t, on account of the ‘scrubbing’.
Would they have any legal recourse, class action suit, or something?
They’d certainly be an injured party.... maybe even have standing...
This thing is indeed larger than Watergate...
Maybe two-year old zer0 arrived in the USA accompanied by a still-living female who wants to remain anonymous.
Stanley Armour at the dock and the kenyan with his arm around another woman who looks like a Filipina?
Maybe he was born in March 1961 when the Bay of Pigs fiasco took place, like he said he was...
Hmm, which little boy are we talking about?
Where is the two-year old? ... Is he “pushed aside”? Or...?
What about X?
From # 59:
I was thinking of all the other folks that came into the US during that same time period.
Was wondering if they tried to get their records and couldnt, on account of the scrubbing.
Would they have any legal recourse, class action suit, or something?
Theyd certainly be an injured party.... maybe even have standing...
This thing is indeed larger than Watergate...
Brennan work ... and I don’t mean Walter Brennan. If Sandy Burglar can steal documents from the Archives without real punishment, imagine what Brennan has done and will never be indicted for any of it! There may even be wet work in the list.
But I'm telling you, 'Dear Freepers' IF no one can see that the boy on the left is zero, don't bother trying to tell me he is 'David' - because THERE NEVER WAS A DAVID.
The dark boy was probably the child Mary baby sat for Anna Obama, the Filipino wife of the kenyan student, and guess what HIS name probably was?
The darker boy may be Barack Hussein 0bama, II, now known as Roman “pushed aside” 0bama.
I’ve forgotten the Swahili name for “pushed aside”. (Or maybe another dialect.)
I guess being ‘progressive’ means laws are meant to be broken and punishment is such an old-fashioned, conservative idea...
ROMAN OBAMA EKUA.
But he wasn't using that when he was interviewed at the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow in 1992, when he was a 31 year old law student...where he said he had been for almost a decade, which places him in Moscow from around the early eighties, near the time the kenyan was buried.
There's a feature article from a Kenya publication that states clearly that the NAMESAKE son of the kenyan attended the funeral of his father. In 1982.
As a refresher, here's the original story, which btw, a few days later, was changed by the Chicago newspaper, featuring a different student:
So the kenyan and Ruth must have taken the dark boy to Kenya, right? And who is Ruth holding? Mark!
And I’m going to post a warning comment right here and right now...I will not reply to anyone who continues to insist that the dark boy is Mark, or that the lighter boy is David. You’ve been well and truly hoodwinked. Fooled.
The kenyan had a child by someone, but it wasn’t the daughter of the Dunhams. And THAT boy ended up in Kenya.
Poor Mary. No wonder she’s confused. She thinks she babysat zero...but at least she was honest when she was first interviewed, she said she babysat for Anna Obama. Remember?
The was when her own daughter, who was born in July 1959 was 18 months old. That makes it JANUARY 1961.
Could the missing week of entries show Anna Obama and infant?
THanks for the reminders, so the missing microfiche for Aug 1-8 1961 could not be Anna 0bama with an infant.
Hmm. I’m confused about who would be entering the US at that time that they don’t want anyone to know about.
possible, but unlikely...if you go by Mary’s babysitting timeline, (before she changed her story)the child she babysat was in the US in January 1961...and she didn’t say exactly how old he was...(nor name him btw)
...but I think you could come up with a good guess...
I’m tryin to follow you so instead of bein cheap...I’m gonna reread the thread then ax some questions.....thx
Sheriff Joe: Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number Being Investigated
Good idea...and when you do ask, do me a favour, ask them one question at a time?
I was thinking of genealogists who no doubt have asked for these records before for that time period.
Before Obama’s communist conspirators had them deleted.
Church of latter day saints use to keep these records also.
I think you vastly overestimate my cognitive thinking ability. Mx? It wasn’t the real BHO, wasn’t the toddler known now as BHO. Hmm,
Just keep looking at the two little boys, when the light goes on, tell me...ask yourself, what on earth is the little boy who looks like the kenyan doing sitting beside the the little boy who doesn’t?
Ping to self.
Thanks for the links, SunkenCiv.
Ah, MARK came to the US, with the Kenyan. Ruth?
Ruth...apparently followed the kenyan to Kenya a few weeks after he left the US and they married on Christmas Eve in 1964. (So we are told.)
We are also told that Mark was born in Kenya. So he had to have a 1965 birthdate, if he was.
Mark is about a year old in that family group photo, so it must be/probably is an image from around 1966. Right?
How old is the dark child?
Now you see TWO children in Kenya. WHERE IS ZERO?
Sheriff Joe: 0hbamas Connecticut Social Security Number Being Investigated
Thanks, Hotlanta Mike.
We have no representation in D.C. They are almost universally COWARDS!
This is bigger than Watergate and may be as big as the Kennedy Assasination...our presidency appears to have been stolen
this alone to be unquestioned and unreported by the media shows everyone they are part of the coverup...
Zero must have been in the US at the time the family photo with Ruth holding Mark. I forgot Mark’s DOB when I was thinking who could have entered the US in Aug. 1961.
The only thing I can think of is that Zero is a couple of years old than he claims. And someone brought him to the US at that time when the entry logs are missing. Someone whose name would be known maybe? Otherwise how would an adult or two and a child stand out? Unless the real BHO and the fake BHO had switched names already?
That makes me wonder why they used the poor deceased baby’s DOB for Zero, if the son of the Kenyan’s was available to use as some kind of template when they switched IDs (more or less switched; actually Zero was given the real BHO who was left with some scraps). Unless the original BHO was not born in the US either. (Now I’m really confusing myself.)
Since the original BHO is about a year and a half older than the claimed DOB for the putative BHO, then a good chance Zero was born a couple of years earlier that the Aug. DOB.
Am I close?
I always wondered if zero was born before HI became a state. THAT would have been a problem for him.
you went off the rails after the first sentence, you were doing just fine until then.
Okay, time for bed then.
From what I’ve read Goldwater was born in AZ before statehood and that was not a problem.
Since he wasn’t born there, what does it matter?
Hmm, Zero was brought to the US when he was an infant, then. Had the photo taken with the original BHO at that time. Just wasn’t brought to HI and given into the care of Stanley Ann until later.
Still missing is the inspector general’s report from the archives. Remember Sandy Berger stuffed classified documents in his sock?
Good Lord! There are tons of people who could have done for Obama. All of them are radical and corrupt.
What I don’t get is why they were not available to the public. There is no reason to hide them.
after 50 years open to the public, but the Archives is behind in opening them up...we are long past August 1961-August 2011.
I found nothing on the NA website about the missing records, they should have a news item posted, maybe they need freeping...
We need to freep Obama’s missing archives or Sandy Berger’s dox in sox? Sandy Berger’s is on FR somewhere.
That's what the images appear to tell us, yes.
Yeah, I’ve been clinging to the idea that since he didn’t show up in HI in the custody of Stanley until he was around 2 1/2 to 3 (or thereabouts) he therefore entered the country at that time. I understand very clearly now how preconceived notions get in the way of seeing the whole picture!
So, regarding the missing week of archived records, either Zero had already been given the name BHO at that time (?) or someone who brought him was famous... or had an otherwise connectable name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.