To: Eric Blair 2084; SheLion; Gabz; Hank Kerchief; 383rr; libertarian27; traviskicks; bamahead; CSM; ...
Do we really need this?
Nanny State PING!
2 posted on
03/05/2012 4:11:45 PM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
More regulation = higher prices
Welcome to Obama’s America
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
“90% lean,” labels must now also include the fat percentage, in this example “10% fat.”
Because people are too stupid to subtract 90 from 100 to get 10? Insane.
4 posted on
03/05/2012 4:14:38 PM PST by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You can never do more, you should never wish to do less.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I can just see cattle with different nutritional labels on their sides...they will never have the same nutritional ...from one to the next
6 posted on
03/05/2012 4:18:20 PM PST by
libertarian27
(Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"It's the kind of information that consumers are asking for and we just think it's about helping people make their own best choices by having the information that they need," says Dr. Elisabeth Hagen, Undersecretary for Food Safety at the USDA. Bull$hit. When was the last time any rational person was "asking" for anything the government stuffed down their throats. Well, except for asking by the way they vote. As in "You're really asking for it now!"
7 posted on
03/05/2012 4:18:31 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I can just see cattle with different nutritional labels on their sides...they will never have the same nutritional ...from one to the next
9 posted on
03/05/2012 4:19:08 PM PST by
libertarian27
(Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Didn’t Rush get in trouble for labeling meat?
11 posted on
03/05/2012 4:28:17 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Eric Holder's people have to be provided mindless, meaningless bureaucratic jobs with which to lord it over non-Eric Holder's people.
It's all part of the reparations/redistribution busienss.
16 posted on
03/05/2012 4:48:06 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopaths.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Do they identify what drugs and hormones were administered to the animal? That’s what I would like to know. And I would like to know what kind of food the animal was fed.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In addition to showing the lean content for a particular meat, such as "90% lean," labels must now also include the fat percentage, in this example "10% fat."Labeling to accommodate those who are weapons grade stupid.
18 posted on
03/05/2012 4:51:05 PM PST by
6SJ7
(Meh.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Nutrition labeling for meat becomes mandatory Neat!
That will make the deer easier to see when they're slippin' through the brush.
23 posted on
03/05/2012 6:26:40 PM PST by
and so?
(If it angers you, a sarcasm or irony tag after everything I post should be assumed)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
28 posted on
03/06/2012 4:30:05 AM PST by
tutstar
(Want pings to Aaron Klein articles and OWS nonsense?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
You may laugh now, but the day is coming when they’ll demand meat products be labeled with a picture of the slaughtered animal on it, like some countries mandate putting pictures of cancer patients and diseased lungs on cigarette packs.
29 posted on
03/06/2012 6:19:41 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson