Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

16 Reasons Why Mitt Romney Would Be A Really, Really Bad President
The American Dream ^ | October 31st, 2011

Posted on 03/09/2012 8:45:13 AM PST by SoConPubbie

At this point, it appears very likely that Mitt Romney is going to be the Republican nominee for president in 2012. He has raised far more money than any of the other candidates, he is leading or is near the lead in all of the early states, the mainstream media have anointed him as the frontrunner and a number of recent polls show that most Republicans fully expect Romney to win the nomination. So will Mitt Romney be the next president of the United States? Well, he certainly fits the part. He looks like a president and he speaks very well. But when you look at what he really stands for that is where things become very troubling. The truth is that Mitt Romney is either very wrong or very "soft" on every single major issue. It would be a huge understatement to refer to Mitt Romney as a RINO ("Republican in name only"). When you closely examine their positions, there is very, very little difference between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. Sure, Romney and Obama will say the "right things" to the voters during election season, but the reality is that a Romney administration would be so similar to an Obama administration that you would hardly know that a change has taken place. What you are about to read about Mitt Romney should alarm you very much. Mitt Romney would be a an absolute disaster for this country, and America cannot afford another disastrous presidency.

The fact that Barack Obama looked sharp and could give inspiring speeches helped him go a long way back in 2008. Well, it is the same thing with Romney. The guy looks very presidential and he sounds very presidential. When backed into a corner, he is extremely slick. He rarely makes mistakes and he is very polished.

Mitt Romney is a "politician" in the worst sense of the word. As his past has demonstrated, he will do and say just about anything in order to get elected. The positions he has taken during this campaign season have been carefully calculated to help him win both the Republican nomination and the general election.

That is why so many call Mitt Romney a "flip-flopper". Romney will take just about any political position if he thinks that it will help him. Mitt Romney's wife, Ann Romney, once made the following statement about her husband....

“He can argue any side of a question. And sometimes you think he’s really believing his argument, but he’s not.” So keep that in mind while reading the following information. Mitt Romney is trying to claim that he is a "conservative" and that he is looking out for the American people, but those claims simply are not true.

The following are 16 reasons why Mitt Romney would be a really, really bad president....

#1 Obamacare was one of the worst pieces of legislation ever passed by the U.S. Congress. Mitt Romney says that he would repeal Obamacare, but the reality is that Romneycare was what Obamacare was based on. In fact, a recent MSNBC article brought to light some new information about the relationship between Romneycare and Obamacare....

Newly obtained White House records provide fresh details on how senior Obama administration officials used Mitt Romney’s landmark health-care law in Massachusetts as a model for the new federal law, including recruiting some of Romney’s own health care advisers and experts to help craft the act now derided by Republicans as “Obamacare.”

The records, gleaned from White House visitor logs reviewed by NBC News, show that senior White House officials had a dozen meetings in 2009 with three health-care advisers and experts who helped shape the health care reform law signed by Romney in 2006, when the Republican presidential candidate was governor of Massachusetts. Mitt Romney continues to defend Romneycare, but the reality is that it really is a total nightmare for Massachusetts. The following is how one blogger summarized some of the key points of Romneycare....

• Punitive To Individuals. Everyone must buy health insurance or face tax penalties equal to 50% of cost of standard policy. • Hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on free hospital care were converted into subsidies to help the needy buy insurance. • A health insurance “exchange” was established to help connect the uninsured with private health plans at more affordable rates. • Health plans can offer consumers higher deductibles and more restrictive physician and hospital networks in order to lower costs. • Punitive to Businesses with 11 or more workers that do not offer insurance must pay a $295 per employee fee. • Established payment policy advisory board; one Board member must be from Planned Parenthood. No pro-life organization represented. • Provides Taxpayer-Funded Abortions for copay of $50. So what have been the results of Romneycare in Massachusetts? According to the Daily Caller, health care costs and health insurance premiums have gone up dramatically in Massachusetts....

Since the bill became law, the state’s total direct health-care spending has increased by a remarkable 52 percent. Medicaid spending has gone from less than $6 billion a year to more the $9 billion. Many consumers have seen double-digit percentage increases in their premiums. All of that certainly sounds a whole lot like Obamacare.

Unfortunately, the other Republican candidates have not taken advantage of this weakness. According to one brand new poll, 6 times as many Republicans view Romneycare unfavorably as view it favorably. This is something that the other candidates should be jumping on big time.

#2 During his time as governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney significantly raised taxes. The following is an excerpt from a CBS News article....

Mitt Romney's Harvard MBA and gold-plated resume convinced many business leaders he would follow in the tradition of corporate-friendly Republicans when he was elected governor of Massachusetts in 2002.

Within three years, some had a vastly different opinion, after Romney's efforts raised the tax bill on businesses by $300 million The same article also notes that Romney jacked up "fees and fines" on Massachusetts taxpayers substantially....

Romney and lawmakers also approved hundreds of millions in higher fees and fines during his four years in office. Many in the Massachusetts business community were quite disgusted with Romney by the end of his tenure. Peter Nicholas, the chairman of Boston Science Corporation, says that "tax rates on many corporations almost doubled because of legislation supported by Romney."

#3 Government spending in Massachusetts increased significantly under Mitt Romney. An advocate of smaller government he most definitely is not.

This was especially true for the last two budgets passed under Romney. In fiscal year 2006, government spending in Massachusetts increased by 7.6 percent. In fiscal year 2007, government spending in Massachusetts increased by a whopping 10.2 percent.

#4 It turns out that Mitt Romney is a believer in the theory of man-made global warming. In fact, Al Gore recently praised on Mitt Romney on his blog. In a post entitled "Good for Mitt Romney -- though we've long passed the point where weak lip-service is enough on the Climate Crisis", Al Gore lavished the following praise on the former Massachusetts governor....

"While other Republicans are running from the truth, he is sticking to his guns in the face of the anti-science wing of the Republican Party" Not only that, it is also very important to remember that while Mitt Romney was governor, Massachusetts became the very first state to pass a law to regulate carbon emissions.

#5 If Mitt Romney becomes president, we may actually have "cap and trade" shoved down our throats. While campaigning for president in 2007, Mitt Romney said that he would support a "cap and trade" carbon tax scheme for the entire world....

“I support Cap-and-Trade on a global basis but not the USA going alone. I want to do it with other nations involved and on a global scale.” #6 Mitt Romney had a horrible record of creating jobs while governor of Massachusetts. According to Boston Herald business reporter Bret Arends, only one state in the entire country was worse at creating jobs while Romney was in office....

“During the four years Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts, it had the second worst jobs record of any state in America…it wasn’t a regional issue. The rest of New England created nearly 200,000 jobs.” #7 Mitt Romney was a very enthusiastic supporter of the Wall Street bailouts. When the time comes for more Wall Street bailouts it seems almost certain that Mitt Romney will bail them out again.

#8 If Romney becomes president, get ready for a flood of liberal judges. While he was governor of Massachusetts, there were actually significantly more Democrats among his judicial appointments than there were Republicans.

#9 Mitt Romney is incredibly soft on illegal immigration. Back in 2007, Mitt Romney made the following statement....

“But my view is that those 12 million who've come here illegally should be given the opportunity to sign up to stay here” #10 While he was governor, Mitt Romney received advice on global warming and carbon emissions from the man who is now the top science adviser to Barack Obama. His name is John P. Holdren, and he has some very, very disturbing ideas. For example, he once wrote the following....

"A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births." Holdren also believes that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the U.S. Constitution....

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” So if this is the kind of person that Mitt Romney relied on for "scientific advice" while he was governor, what kind of people would Romney bring in to his administration once he is president?

#11 Mitt Romney has been a huge supporter of gun control laws. When he was running for governor in Massachusetts, he made the following statement....

"We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts- I support them...I believe they help protect us, and provide for our safety." #12 Mitt Romney once claimed that he was more "pro-choice" than Ted Kennedy, but now he claims that he is pro-life. In a recent article for WorldNetDaily, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt explained why so many voters are still skeptical....

This year he's the only major Republican presidential candidate who has yet to sign the Susan B. Anthony List pledge to defend life and defund Planned Parenthood nationwide. Candidates Bachmann, Perry, Gingrich, Paul, Pawlenty and Santorum all signed the pledge, although it should be noted Herman Cain supports everything in the pledge except the Fetal Pain Act. (Cain is not fully pro-life, either.) And who can forget Mitt's famous 2002 campaign debate bragging repeatedly that he's more pro-choice than Ted Kennedy? #13 During this campaign season, Mitt Romney has stated that he only supports partnership agreements for gay couples and not gay marriage, but what Romney actually did while governor of Massachusetts suggests otherwise. In the WorldNetDaily article referenced above, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt detailed how Mitt Romney aggressively implemented gay marriage in the state of Massachusetts....

When the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided in 2003 to recognize homosexual "marriage," ignoring the voters and the Constitution, the court admitted it did not have power to issue licenses or force participation by justices of the peace to solemnize the weddings. But as governor, Romney didn't wait for the legislature to act, he just ordered the marriage licenses and weddings to go forward, all by himself. Earlier this month, Romney said in New Hampshire, "What I would support [nationwide] is letting people who are of the same gender form – if you will – partnership agreements." #14 As late as 2007, Mitt Romney was a member of the Republican Main Street Partnership. The following is what says about this organization....

They often work in conjunction with the pro-abortion group, Republicans for Choice, and the Republican homosexual group, the Log Cabin Club. They also opposed the nomination of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and set up a 527 campaign committee that received funding from far left funder George Soros. #15 According to the Huffington Post, Mitt Romney has raised more money from lobbyists than all of the other Republican candidates combined.

So if Mitt Romney becomes president, who do you think he is going to listen to - the American people or the lobbyists?

#16 Mitt Romney is a big time Wall Street insider. It is estimated that Romney has a personal fortune of approximately a quarter of a billion dollars, and Wall Street money is being absolutely showered on his campaign.

In a recent article entitled "The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election", I detailed how numbers compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show that Mitt Romney is getting far more money from the "too big to fail" Wall Street banks than all of the other Republican candidates combined. The following is an excerpt from that article that shows how much money employees of those banks (and their wives) have been giving to Romney so far this year....


Goldman Sachs

Mitt Romney: $352,200 Barack Obama: $49,124 Tim Pawlenty: $25,000 Jon Huntsman: $6,750 Rick Perry: $5,500 Ron Paul: $2,500

Morgan Stanley

Mitt Romney: $184,800 Tim Pawlenty: $41,715 Barack Obama: $28,225 Rick Perry: $20,750 Jon Huntsman: $9,750 Newt Gingrich: $1,000 Ron Paul: $1,000 Herman Cain: $500

Bank of America

Mitt Romney: $112,500 Barack Obama: $46,699 Tim Pawlenty: $12,750 Jon Huntsman: $4,250 Ron Paul: $3,451 Rick Perry: $2,600 Thad McCotter: $2,000 Herman Cain: $750 Michele Bachmann: $500 Newt Gingrich: $250

JPMorgan Chase

Mitt Romney: $107,250 Barack Obama: $38,039 Rick Perry: $27,050 Tim Pawlenty: $16,750 Jon Huntsman: $7,500 Ron Paul: $5,451


Mitt Romney: $56,550 Barack Obama: $36,887 Tim Pawlenty: $5,300 Rick Perry: $3,000 Herman Cain: $1,465 Michele Bachmann: $1,000 Ron Paul: $702

As you can see, no other Republican candidate even comes close to Romney at any of these big Wall Street banks.

In fact, of the candidates that are left in the Republican race, Mitt Romney has raised 13 times as much Wall Street money as anyone else has.

The following are the overall donation numbers from employees of the big Wall Street banks and their wives....

Mitt Romney: $813,300 Barack Obama: $198,874 Tim Pawlenty: $101,515 Rick Perry: $58,900 Jon Huntsman: $28,250 Ron Paul: $13,104 Herman Cain: $2,715 Michelle Bachmann: $1,500 Newt Gingrich: $1,250

These numbers paint a very disturbing picture. Even though Romney's poll numbers are in the mid to low 20s most of the time, employees of the big Wall Street banks gave him $813,300 during the first 9 months of this year and they only gave $105,719 to the rest of the Republican candidates combined.


It is quite obvious that the "establishment" is in love with Mitt Romney.

But if the American people elect Mitt Romney, they will get someone who believes in big spending, big government, bank bailouts, health care mandates, climate change legislation, liberal judges, gun control laws, amnesty for illegal aliens and making things as comfortable for the fatcats on Wall Street as possible.

Yes, Barack Obama has been absolutely horrible, but the answer is most definitely not Mitt Romney.

Look, the truth is that another four years of Barack Obama would be a complete and total nightmare.

But so would four years of Mitt Romney.

America deserves better than the "lesser of two evils".

Unfortunately, the American people have been dead asleep and have been sending incompetents, con men and charlatans to Washington D.C. for decades.

Right now it looks like the Republican Party is going to nominate yet another establishment "politician" in 2012.

Hopefully people will wake up to the truth about Mitt Romney while there is still time.

TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: romney
That is why so many call Mitt Romney a "flip-flopper". Romney will take just about any political position if he thinks that it will help him. Mitt Romney's wife, Ann Romney, once made the following statement about her husband....

“He can argue any side of a question. And sometimes you think he’s really believing his argument, but he’s not.” So keep that in mind while reading the following information. Mitt Romney is trying to claim that he is a "conservative" and that he is looking out for the American people, but those claims simply are not true.

1 posted on 03/09/2012 8:45:19 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
From 2008 and why I ignore every single word out of his mouth:

2 posted on 03/09/2012 8:49:00 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Surprised they could keep it to 16.

3 posted on 03/09/2012 8:53:18 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

There are some zeros missing from that 16.

4 posted on 03/09/2012 8:56:14 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
16 Reasons Why Mitt Romney Would Be A Really, Really Bad President

... and he'll still be 100 times better than Obama.

Will I be happy if Romney gets the Republican nomination? No.

Will I vote for him over Obama? Absolutely.

5 posted on 03/09/2012 8:57:48 AM PST by ConfusedAndLovingIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I’ve followed Romney for years, supported him in 2008 over McCain, and frankly, I think he’d be a good President.

That said, my biggest fears are:

1) Does he have the balls to do what is going to be required to defeat Obama and the MSM Media Machine behind him?

2) Does he have the balls to do what is going to be required to turn this economy around?

This is a far different environment than 2008 was, even with the messianic media worship of Obama. It’s now an atmosphere of HATE. Pure, unadulterated, Left and Media HATE.

Newt Gingrich might be a real son-of-a-bitch, but I think a real son-of-a-bitch is exactly what it’s going to take to defeat Obama, and do the hard things that are going to have to be done to turn things around. And he has a history of doing the hard things.

He may be exactly the right bastard, at exactly the right time, much like Winston Churchill was.

Sorry for the stark descriptions, but that is EXACTLY what it is, IMHO.

6 posted on 03/09/2012 8:59:43 AM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConfusedAndLovingIt
Will I vote for him over Obama? Absolutely.

Would I? Probably, but that will be a vote against 0bama rather than a vote for Romney.
My fear is that he will continue the 0bama policies unabated, the country will continues its slide into the mud pit and the only difference is that the (R)'s will be blamed for it and our next president will be a (D) again.

7 posted on 03/09/2012 9:08:48 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

I’ll write in “Mickey Mouse”, Mitt is more dangerous in the long run, because he is more stealth in his socialism....Obama is right up front about it, so it’s easier to oppose.

8 posted on 03/09/2012 9:10:30 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

I would vote for him if he is the nominee, only becasue we must get Obama and his Marxist corrupt Administration out of office before they can do more long term damage to this nation.

And if he is the nominee, it will be the end of the GOP as a political party, even if he wins the Presidency. A new third party of conservatives and Tea Party Patriots will create a party for themselves and leave the GOP go the way of the Whigs.

A win for Romney is a Pyrrhic victory for the GOP.

I am fighting for Newt now. He is the only one who can beat Obama. And that is the truth.

9 posted on 03/09/2012 9:14:46 AM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
10 posted on 03/09/2012 9:18:12 AM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Ineligible Dog Abuser and Backstabber:
"Put this thing on the roof of our car."


Romney's bad behavior Exposed by Seamus

"Romney Loses Nomination Over Dog Abuse? - Romney was traveling that summer with his wife, five sons, and Seamus to his parent's cottage on Lake Huron. But hours into the ride, Seamus apparently suffered diarrhea, which ran down the back window of the car. .David Kravitz wrote on BlueMassGroup, a liberal blog. "It also strikes me as classic Romney: it solves a problem efficiently, in a business-like manner, and with no regard whatsoever for the suffering that the solution may cause."

"But the details of the event are more than unseemly - they may, in fact, be illegal. Massachusetts's animal cruelty laws specifically prohibit anyone from carrying an animal "in or upon a vehicle, or otherwise, in an unnecessarily cruel or inhuman manner or in a way and manner which might endanger the animal carried thereon. "An officer for the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals responded to a description of the situation saying "it's definitely something I'd want to check out." The officer, Nadia Branca, declined to give a definitive opinion on whether Romney broke the law but did note that it's against state law to have a dog in an open bed of a pick-up truck, and "if the dog was being carried in a way that endangers it, that would be illegal."

"Dog on Roof? What Was It Like for Romney's Pooch? - Scientists Say Dog Likely Experienced Wind-Whipped, Uncomfortable Trip - "Before beginning the drive, Mitt Romney put Seamus, the family's hulking Irish setter, in a dog carrier and attached it to the station wagon's roof rack. e'd built a windshield for the carrier, to make the ride more comfortable for the dog,".. Jordan Kaplan, the owner of Petaholics, a dog walking service in New York City,
and a lifelong dog owner and dog lover, said Romney's actions were uncalled for"

"Romney's dog - This is a distinction Mitt Romney probably could do without, but he is surely the first presidential candidate to be attacked for putting a dog with diarrhea in a carrier and tying it to the top of a station wagon. Romney's defense: Seamus liked it. [like the citizens under Romney's RomneyCARE, etc.?] "

"As the oldest son, Tagg Romney commandeered the way-back of the wagon, keeping his eyes fixed out the rear window, where he glimpsed the first sign of trouble. ''Dad!'' he yelled. ''Gross!'' A brown liquid was dripping down the back window, payback from an Irish setter who'd been riding on the roof in the wind for hours. As the rest of the boys joined in the howls of disgust, Romney coolly pulled off the highway and into a service station. There, he borrowed a hose, washed down Seamus and the car, then hopped back onto the highway."

"Story about dog on car roof comes back to bite Romney - 200 comments from readers complaining of animal cruelty"

“PolitickerNY has a report out Tuesday that
Seamus, the dog Romney famously put on the
roof of the car when the family drove to Canada in
1983, may have actually run away once the
Romneys reached the Great White North. As any
Gail Collins readers will know by now, a 2004
Boston Globe story revealed that Mitt Romney
strapped his dog's crate to the roof of the family
car, terrifying the pooch in the process. Though it
was intended as an illustration of Romney's quirky
crisis-management, pet lovers everywhere have let
it live on as evidence of candidate's cruelty.

PolitckerNY's Hunter Walker cites two anonymous
sources who say the Romney sons told reporters
off-the-record that Seamus actually ran away once
they reached Canada. Mitt Romney has said
Seamus lived long past that trip, and that he
enjoyed riding on top of the car, by way of
deflecting attacks from PETA and other animal
advocates. But expect this new development to
fuel the arguments of those who think the act was abusive.”

11 posted on 03/09/2012 9:22:57 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConfusedAndLovingIt

“... and he’ll still be 100 times better than Obama.”

Why don’t you post the hundred ways...? We’ll judge if you are correct.

12 posted on 03/09/2012 9:23:56 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldnÂ’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Most important election in my lifetime and with Romney as the nominee, once again the choice would be evil and lesser evil.

I just can't vote that way any more. I've been a dutiful, though unsatisfied, voter for all GOP presidential candidates since I was eligible to vote.

What I've learned about voting for lesser evil is you get what you vote for.

The only real differences between Romney and obama is not where they will take us, but how they'll get us there and they'll finance it.

One way or another, obama and the DNC are going to drag us kicking and screaming and throw us over the cliff and into the socialist pit.

Romney, like the Bushes, is all about kinder, gentler Progressive-ism.

They're really "Compassionate Progressives" who'll throw us into the same, but better managed Big Government utopian hell as the demonrats, but without our kicking and screaming. They want us to like the idea.

I think I'll pass.

13 posted on 03/09/2012 9:32:38 AM PST by GBA (Natural Born American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConfusedAndLovingIt
This list is a little unfair. It doesn't give him any credit for having good hair.

Conservatives don't trust Romney because of his past statements and his record as governor in areas such as taxes, gun control, and "social issues." I don't trust him on those issues but I don't think he is as fanatically wrong as Obama is, and if he were President we could put pressure on him, whereas we can't with Obama.

On the economy and national defense he would be a lot better than Obama--he doesn't want to destroy capitalism or weaken the US like Obama does.

14 posted on 03/09/2012 9:44:26 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


No matter how bad you think he’d be, he will be far better than the POS marxist in office now. FUBO.

15 posted on 03/09/2012 9:44:43 AM PST by bfree (The revolution is coming - OBAMI IS THE ENEMY OF FREEDOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Romney will never be POTUS as his nomination will hand the election to Obama just like McCain did in 2008 and Bob Dole handed the election to Clinton in 1996. So-called Moderate Republicans don’t have a chance as they stand for nothing and will not take the issues to their opponent least it seem uncivil or upsetting to other moderates.

16 posted on 03/09/2012 9:47:32 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bfree
Perhaps. He hasn't won me over.

His scorched earth campaign style makes me angry.

His gaff prone, out of touch with the average voter persona makes me cringe.

And, some of his past campaign platforms makes me fearful of giving him power.

Finally, I am bothered by doubt about the kind of nominee(s) he'd appoint to the SC.

To me, exchanging FUBO for FUMR isn't moving the ball forward and won't win the Superbowl in November.

17 posted on 03/09/2012 10:10:57 AM PST by GBA (Natural Born American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie


18 posted on 03/09/2012 10:27:15 AM PST by OldPossum (ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

why don’t they get it????

It’s about RomneyCare, Stupid !

19 posted on 03/09/2012 10:28:41 AM PST by nevermorelenore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Newt Gingrich might be a real son-of-a-bitch, but I think a real son-of-a-bitch is exactly what it’s going to take to defeat Obama, and do the hard things that are going to have to be done to turn things around. And he has a history of doing the hard things.

I agree with you. But I don't see how it is going to happen given the current electoral math:

At least with Santorum, we've got a shot at sending the game into overtime with a long field goal. And that's even if we color Alabama and Mississippi red next Tuesday.
20 posted on 03/09/2012 10:43:01 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConfusedAndLovingIt
100 times better? What are you smoking?

He'll follow the same policies as Obama, just tinkering around the edges. And what makes it worse is that the Republicans in the House and Senate will back him up, while there's a chance they would defy Obama on the vary same point.

Well, maybe I over-stated that. There's a small chance that the Republicans in the Senate would stand up to anybody; they'd find a way to have sympathy for the Devil himself.

21 posted on 03/09/2012 2:32:01 PM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConfusedAndLovingIt

Aren’t you LDS?

22 posted on 03/09/2012 2:37:50 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson