Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama spends $10 million to develop $50 light bulb
dailymail.com ^ | March 9, 2012 | Don Surber

Posted on 03/09/2012 11:36:59 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY

The Obama administration created a $10 million L Prize to award the manufacturer who came up with an affordable and efficient light bulb. One would think the marketplace would take care of that but our federal government no more believes in free enterprise than I believe in global warming. This program began under President Bush.

Ah yes, who knows more about efficiency than the federal government?

In August, Philips announced: “The U.S. Department of Energy today announced that Philips Lighting North America has won the 60-watt replacement bulb category of the Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize (L Prize) competition. The Department of Energy’s L Prize challenged the lighting industry to develop high performance, energy-saving replacements for conventional light bulbs that will save American consumers and businesses money. If every 60-watt incandescent bulb in the U.S. was replaced with the 10-watt L Prize winner, the nation would save about 35 terawatt-hours of electricity or $3.9 billion in one year and avoid 20 million metric tons of carbon emissions.”

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.dailymail.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: democrats; greenfraud; obama; thegreenlie

1 posted on 03/09/2012 11:37:03 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Its a freekin LED! Whats the research for?
You build a tiny ac/dc converter on a chip, you put that in the base and you put an LED array on top. Voila! Fin!

Can anyone spell “Boondoggle”?


2 posted on 03/09/2012 11:41:27 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

And how long will this $50 bulb last. The curly ones don’t last as long as advertised.


3 posted on 03/09/2012 11:43:15 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I have a 32” LCD HDTV that I got for $275 delivered, but Phillips can’t make an LED lightbulb for under $50

Boy are we dumb!
Dumb all over... and maybe a little ugly on the side..


4 posted on 03/09/2012 11:45:32 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

The LEDS will last for 1,000,000 hrs but the converter/regulator chip will be designed to fart out in 10,000 hours.
Then you will get to pay a disposal fee to have them shipped back to Phillips who will just slap the LED’s on a new converter/regulator base!


5 posted on 03/09/2012 11:50:12 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Just another great business model.

The same thing is being made in China for a quarter of the cost.


6 posted on 03/09/2012 11:52:54 AM PST by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
If every 60-watt incandescent bulb in the U.S. was replaced with the 10-watt L Prize winner, the nation would save about 35 terawatt-hours of electricity....

And

One-Half of the population would be crippled due to stumbling in the dark !!!

7 posted on 03/09/2012 11:54:37 AM PST by Chief901 (Well, he should have armed himself if he's going to decorate his saloon with my friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chief901
And One-Half of the population would be crippled due to stumbling in the dark !!!

That is why they have provided us with Obamacare! /s

8 posted on 03/09/2012 12:06:14 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I just checked and there are plenty of 100 watt incandescent light bulbs available here: http://www.bulbs.com/


9 posted on 03/09/2012 12:15:29 PM PST by dainbramaged (I nearly threw my pit bull at the television.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Cost and longevity will not be problems if they are required to be provided by employers and their insurance companies, as far less expensive condoms now are. Surely, no antiquated religious organization could object to innocent light bulbs! /sarc


10 posted on 03/09/2012 12:21:35 PM PST by DanMiller (Dan Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Also, as just heard on Rush Limbaugh:

http://www.newcandescent.com


11 posted on 03/09/2012 12:34:31 PM PST by Rio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Lighting is 11% of your electric bill. If your bill is $50 a month it’s about $5. So the bulb pays for itself in 10 months. WOW! BTW that’s if you only have one light in your house.


12 posted on 03/09/2012 12:53:10 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Actually we should make money on these. Isn’t there a a plan for a $45 tax credit for each one bought?


13 posted on 03/09/2012 7:17:21 PM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson