[melancholy]

What’s with the “missing” 19?

We should ask Farrakhan who’s the Guru on the number 19!!

However, the seal is correct because the date is correct. It was year 80 AD.

How’s that for an explanation. Do you have a problem with that?

Gee, I think I’ll join the defenders. I can explain everything with ease with no accountability.

[Fantasywriter]

“What’s with the “missing” 19?

We should ask Farrakhan who’s the Guru on the number 19!!

However, the seal is correct because the date is correct. It was year 80 AD.

How’s that for an explanation. Do you have a problem with that?”

Too funny! Are you here all week? Should I try the veal? Lol.

[john mirse]

However, the seal is correct because the date is correct. It was year 80 AD.

How’s that for an explanation. Do you have a problem with that?

******

Yes. I have a problem with that.

If your date of 80 A.D. is correct, that would mean that Obama is nearly 2000 years old, and that is not logical, because Obama doesn't look 2000 years old, and because the United States post office agency did not even exist, as far as I know, in 80 A.D.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

"I can explain everything with ease with no accountability."

Got a link for that?
/s

This is not a game, cynwoody. This is about the constitution. Put the kool-aid down, son.