Skip to comments.Cowardly congress won't investigate Manchurian Candidate Obama
Posted on 03/25/2012 10:03:30 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
No hearings into Barack Hussein Obamas eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States will be held nor or any even scheduled, a spokeswoman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said on Wednesday, March 21, at 1:04 p.m.
NO, she answered in curt reply to the question, Do You Have Any Hearings Scheduled? even though Obama does not pass an E-verify check and the Arpaio investigation by seasoned law enforcement and legal personnel turned up very credible evidence of fraud and forgery in birth certificate and selective service documents on file for the sitting president!
Democrat attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch USA, filed a lawsuit in Broward Country Florida on behalf of Democrat Michael Voeltz, on March 20, citing suspicions that Obama might not have been born in the U.S. and the fact that his father never was a U.S. citizen. (1)
Florida has a policy of not printing presidential candidates names on the general election ballot if the candidate does not meet the constitutional qualifications. (2)
The Klayman lawsuit, according to World Net Daily, contends that the requirement for natural-born citizenship which is found in the U.S. Constitution was intended to prevent foreign influences from influencing an American President.
As Klayman filed his lawsuit in an attempt to keep Obama off of the Florida presidential election ballot, he expressed concerns that sympathizing with and taking actions that benefit foreign interests, and not interests of the United States and her citizens, have been WITNESSED by the American people during...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
that the requirement for natural-born citizenship which is found in the U.S. Constitution was intended to prevent foreign influences from influencing an American President.
Does that matter to our Congress?
Congress, the Democrans, and the Republicans have no cajonies with respect to Obama’s elgibility. This makes them complicit in his actions.
Our President can’t pass e-verify. Our gardeners have to, but not our freaking PRESIDENT??
"Are you Serious?"
It's covered under the commerce clause. /s
Mothers Against Illegal Aliens/Amnesty:
" "BIRTHERS", I give you CONGRESS! All of THEM! "
I tried to access the website that conained his Kenyan birth certificate and discovered it is no longer available.
Damm it. You gotta act fast before the obama supporters hide any new information about the S.O.B
I’m not so sure being “cowardly” is a valid excuse. Being complicit and treasonous is possibly better definitions. If they don’t take action, they’re part of it.
I’m coming to believe that it no longer matters what is ever proven. The Congress and the court system will never take action against Obama. They have all become a corrupt cabal or are so cowed that they are useless.
Obama needs to leave America, take all the race-baiting,welfare dependent blacks and gangbangers, drug dealers and other scum and start his own country instead of ruining ours.
Can you blame Congress?
Too many of their members are directly implicated in this national deception — it has become a matter of CYA.
Obama is not ruining our country — Congress is, by not wanting to get to the truth.
IMO, the ones who weren’t directly complicit in this fraud, were “advised” - ***told/warned/threatened*** - NOT. TO. GO. THERE. FOR. ANY. REASON. WHATSOEVER. EVER.
One must have a sense of pride and honor before one can be shamed.
At the very least, fraud charges need to be brought against the 0bama administration for the dissemination of a phony document under the guise of officiality. I know that’s probably not even a word, but you get the gist.
The US government is obviously so entrenched in corruption that it cannot possibly cleanse itself from within. If this country is to ever be re-established to a Constitutional Republic where by the rule of the law is enforced equally to all, that restoration will have to be of Gods hands or of the peoples.
Why should they and run the risk of facing hilary instead, not to mention cause problems for Rubio and Jindal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.