Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walking Papers? The Incredibly Thin, Speculative Zimmerman Affidavit (Interesting article)
PJ Media ^ | April 17, 2012 | Bob Owens

Posted on 04/17/2012 1:01:47 PM PDT by jazusamo

Angela Corey's filing against George Zimmerman bears the hallmarks of a career-ender.

Last week, Florida prosecutor Angela Corey stunned many within the legal establishment when she announced her office was filing a second-degree murder charge against George Zimmerman. The four-page affidavit of probable cause filed by Corey’s office shocked legal experts, ranging from liberal Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and liberal law bloggerJeralyn Merritt to conservative former prosecutorAndrew McCarthy and talk show host Mark Levin, among others.

The affidavit starts out typically, listing the names and qualifications of the two investigators used by the special prosecutor. It then begins to build a case against George Zimmerman:

On Sunday 2/26/12, Trayvon Martin was temporarily living at the Retreat at Twin Lakes, a gated community in Sanford, Seminole County, Florida. That evening Martin walked to a nearby 7-11 Store where he purchased a can of iced tea and some Skittles. Martin then walked back to and entered the gated community and was on his way back to the townhouse where he was living when he was profiled by George Zimmerman. Martin was unarmed and was not committing a crime.

Not one paragraph into the “meat” of the affidavit, Corey’s team already made two unsubstantiated claims.

First: there is no publicly known evidence that supports the contention that Zimmerman “profiled” Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman’s 911 call made no reference to skin color or apparel until the the police dispatcher started pressing for a better description. If Corey’s team had evidence that Zimmerman racially profiled Martin, they should have included it here. They did not, which not only undermines the profiling charge in this case, but in any federal civil rights case the U.S. Department of Justice may have been considering.

The second unsubstantiated claim: they say Martin was not committing or preparing to commit a crime. Zimmerman became suspicious because he saw a figure who struck him as a person casing houses for burglary potential. Unbeknownst to Zimmerman at the time was the fact that Martin had been suspended from school for the possession of a “ burglary tool.” We don’t know what Martin was thinking, but his actions were erratic enough to prompt George Zimmerman to want police to investigate.

That represents a lot of unsubstantiated speculation by a prosecutor trying to build an affidavit to support a second-degree murder charge, and that’s just from the first substantive paragraph.

The next troublesome claim is the lead sentence of the following paragraph:

Zimmerman, who also lived in the gated community and was driving his vehicle, observed Martin and assumed he was a criminal.

Perhaps it is hair-splitting, but there is no evidence to support Corey’s claim that Zimmerman assumed Martin was a criminal. In his first comments on the 911 call, Zimmerman claims he saw “a real suspicious guy” acting erratically: “Like he’s up to no good or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around looking about.”

Zimmerman was merely reporting suspicious behavior, just as our own Department of Homeland Security advocates with its “ If You See Something, Say Something” campaign, which has been created and promoted by cabinet officials appointed by the Obama Administration. Zimmerman saw someone acting suspiciously, and did precisely what DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano wants citizens to do in that situation.

The prosecutor then made another claim not supported by the recorded evidence:

The police dispatcher then informed Zimmerman that an officer was on the way and to wait for the officer.

The second half of that claim is a complete and apparently willful misrepresentation of the conversation between George Zimmerman and the police dispatcher. The closest the dispatcher ever gets to telling Zimmerman to “wait for the officer” was when Zimmerman was attempting to follow Martin, and the dispatcher told him, precisely: “Okay, we don’t need you to do that.”

In response to the dispatcher’s comment — which isn’t a command, but an ambiguous statement — Zimmerman’s response is “Okay,” and an immediate termination of his attempt to follow Trayvon Martin.

Zimmerman spends the next 93 seconds — more than enough time for Trayvon Martin to reach where he is staying, even at a walking pace — in one location talking to the police dispatcher, informing the dispatcher that he is on the way back to his truck, and that he will meet the responding officer by the mailboxes.

Angela Corey’s team is misrepresenting the actual events as they occurred in order to fabricate a claim that George Zimmerman disobeyed police orders. Proving her behavior is one matter, but to be found deliberately misrepresenting the evidence is certainly grounds for considering disbarment.

The affidavit contained further problematic statements. The next one:

During the recorded call Zimmerman made reference to people he felt had committed and gotten away with break-ins in his neighborhood. Later while talking about Martin, Zimmerman stated “these a**holes, they always get away” and also said “these f***ing punks.”

John Work, a multi-decade law enforcement veteran, caught something in this prejudicial paragraph that I’d missed on my first reading:

Either Zimmerman and the investigators who wrote the affidavit knew there had been burglaries in the neighborhood, or they did not know about any burglaries. It’s not possible to credibly say that anyone, including the defendant, felt that crimes had been committed. If, in fact, there was or was not a series of unsolved burglaries in that neighborhood, the cops should have included that fact in the affidavit. It’s a lie of omission, either way.

Corey’s affidavit then made even more unsubstantiated claims:

Zimmerman got out of his vehicle and followed Martin. When the police dispatcher realized Zimmerman was pursuing Martin, he instructed Zimmerman not to do that and that the responding officer would meet him. Zimmerman disregarded the police dispatcher and continued to follow Martin who was trying to return to his home.

The affidavit’s claim is in direct opposition to the facts as recorded on the 911 call.

Zimmerman was not “instructed” of anything. The use of that particular word creates the impression that Zimmerman was affirmatively told — commanded — not to do something. That isn’t what occurred. The dispatcher spoke ambiguously: “We don’t need you to do that.”

Then, the affidavit makes the completely unsupported claim that Zimmerman continued to follow Martin, even as the 911 call indicates that he stopped following Martin and was stationary for more than a minute and a half before attempting to return to his truck to meet with the responding officer. This, again, appears to be a misrepresentation by the prosecutor, unsupported (and possibly refuted) by the known evidence.

The affidavit also makes the completely unsupported claim at the end of that paragraph that Martin “was trying to return to his home.”

There is no evidence of the sort. The timeline strongly suggests that — having evaded Zimmerman initially and with Zimmerman terminating his pursuit and then heading back the way he came — Martin had plenty of time and a direct, unobstructed path home had he chosen to return directly home. We don’t know where Martin was or what he was doing between the time he fled Zimmerman and when the confrontation began. What we do know is that Martin had an opportunity to make it home, and chose not to do so for reasons we may never know.

The affidavit continues:

Zimmerman confronted Martin and a struggle ensued. Witnesses heard people arguing and what sounded like a struggle. During this time period witnesses heard numerous calls for help and some of these were recorded in 911 calls to police. Trayvon Martin’s mother has reviewed the 911 and identified the voice crying for help as Trayvon Martin’s voice.

“Zimmerman confronted Martin.”

This is supposition, apparently based upon the recollection of Martin’s girlfriend. There is no physical evidence or eyewitness supporting this charge.

The next part of that crucial sentence has already been ripped apart by legal experts — the passive “and a struggle ensued.”

This entire case hinges upon who started the confrontation and then escalated it into a deadly force event that left a young man dead. If the prosecution has evidence that Zimmerman indeed triggered the confrontation and initiated the struggle, then Zimmerman’s self-defense claim becomes much harder to support. If the events occurred as Zimmerman described it — with the confrontation initiated by Martin, the physical assault initiated by Martin, and Martin then escalating the fight to assault with a deadly weapon by attempting to smash Zimmerman’s head on the concrete — and the evidence supports Zimmerman’s claims, then we have a justified use of deadly force in self-defense.

Sybrina Fulton’s contention that the voice she heard crying for help on the 911 calls was her son certainly adds emotional pain to the case; her claim is not one I would personally wish to challenge at a trial if she is called as a witness. However, competent attorneys routinely cast doubt on such testimony, perhaps by citing confirmation bias and the trauma of losing a child. No known audio experts have come forth to claim they can confirm with any degree of certainty that the voice calling for help is Martin. I would venture that Fulton’s claim is included in the affidavit only to elicit an emotional response from the public, which would be a grandstanding ploy, and perhaps an especially cynical one by a veteran prosecutor seeking reelection just a few months from now.

There are simply no facts in this affidavit to remotely support the charge of second-degree murder according to Florida’s statute, which reads :

The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree …

There is nothing in this affidavit nor among the publicly known facts about the case — nor even among the allegations from the victim’s family or their attorneys — that comes even remotely close to reaching the “depraved mind” standard. At most, the prosecutor would face making a difficult manslaughter case, and even then would risk having the lesser charge thrown out for insufficient evidence.

I am comfortable with saying that Corey’s multiple references to “Justice for Trayon” during her press conference combined with this breathtaking affidavit strongly suggest a political motivation.

I live and work in central North Carolina, just miles away from where an overzealous, politically minded prosecutor named Mike Nifong attempted to railroad athletes from the Duke University lacrosse team in a similarly racially charged environment just a half-decade ago.

Nifong was disbarred and found guilty of criminal contempt for his actions. Angela Corey’s affidavit against George Zimmerman looks to be treading dangerously close to that same path.


TOPICS: Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: angelacorey; florida; georgezimmerman; martin; trayvonmartin; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last
Nifong was disbarred and found guilty of criminal contempt for his actions. Angela Corey’s affidavit against George Zimmerman looks to be treading dangerously close to that same path.

If Corey doesn't have a lot more than what's in the affidavit Owens and the lawyers listed in the article seem to be correct.

1 posted on 04/17/2012 1:02:02 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Angela Corey’s filing against George Zimmerman bears the hallmarks of a career-ender.”

UNLESS...

Unless you WANT to loos the case, or get it thrown out and thereby create rioting...


2 posted on 04/17/2012 1:06:20 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Could be...With the turkey we have in the WH I’d hesitate to argue against that possibility.


3 posted on 04/17/2012 1:10:59 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Angela Corey...hmmmm.....with ZERO digging, I can say two things for certainty: she’s female and liberal, and.....one thing via assumption only: she’s black.

May be wrong on the assumption part...maybe.....but not the first part.

IOW, she’s a drooling idiot who should never be allowed to “practice” law again.


4 posted on 04/17/2012 1:17:16 PM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

OK....I looked (I had to). She’s white. Definitely right on everything else I “guessed”.


5 posted on 04/17/2012 1:22:11 PM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
She's not black but she just may have her law license jerked.
6 posted on 04/17/2012 1:23:16 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

7 posted on 04/17/2012 1:25:17 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

Nope, Republican.


8 posted on 04/17/2012 1:27:06 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

Nope, Republican.


9 posted on 04/17/2012 1:27:37 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

Corey is not a liberal. I know her, do you?

She is over the top in some of her accusations, that is true.

She hates the stand your ground law.

She is not running for reelection according to what she has said for over a year.

She may have something against hispanics, she is currently prosecuting for murder a 12 yo boy with a hispanic name.

lastly, she defeated someone I would call a philosophical social worker in the last election.


10 posted on 04/17/2012 1:28:23 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Bump for later reading.


11 posted on 04/17/2012 1:29:54 PM PDT by CitizenM (Obama studied our Constution out of hate for America, not out of love for our laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

My guess it that this will never get past the pre-trial hearing. Then the prosecutor can tell Jesse, Al, the Black Panthers et al that she tried and hope they don’t burn the city down.


12 posted on 04/17/2012 1:33:16 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Who is this person writing this and how important is this person? Any old person’s opinion doesn’t matter much. What matters is the opinion of the judges in the state of Florida and those on the board of the Florida state bar association.


13 posted on 04/17/2012 1:34:19 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
You are correct Corey is no liberal. However she is a classic ‘law and order’ conservative. These folks are as dangerous to individual liberties as any leftist. They are in love with the majesty of the law and the power of the state. I recall vividly one very conservative magistrate literally becoming incoherently rageful when I stated that the Waco cultists were within their rights as Americans to use deadly force to defend themselves against unknown raiders. His entire argument was ‘they fired on law enforcement officers’. The same here i fear is Corey detests the idea that just anyone without a badge or ‘the color of law’ can defend themselves and use deadly force. Because that means one has no obligation to retreat before the power and majesty of the state if one is doing no wrong and defending ones person or property.
14 posted on 04/17/2012 1:39:19 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mouton; RightOnline
I suspect Corey is a statist AG (aspiring governor), and her issue is Zimmerman did not have permission from one of her ruling elite ilk. How dare he obtain a firearm in a shall-issue state?

Statists are no better than Communists.

Assuming the legal case is complete by the election, I would vote for a Republican that promised prosecution and imprisonment of Corey as a campaign pledge.

15 posted on 04/17/2012 1:44:50 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
He's not the only one to comment on this. He links three attorneys above but didn't link Dershowitz, here's a thread on FR on Dershowitz' thoughts.

Dershowitz: Zimmerman Affidavit ‘Irresponsible And Unethical’

16 posted on 04/17/2012 1:46:37 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

“She hates the stand your ground law.”

Based on the information in this article she has failed to uphold the law and is allowing her feelings to overrule her oath of office. She should be removed from office and not allowed to move on to a higher position.

I think that she is showing overt sign of RINO disease. She obviously doesn’t believe in the law.


17 posted on 04/17/2012 1:47:09 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I agree with you 100%


18 posted on 04/17/2012 1:47:13 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

You be dead on.


19 posted on 04/17/2012 1:47:49 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Watch for the liberal tactic of putting the gun on trial. Why was Mr. Z carrying a gun if he didn’t plan on shooting someone? If he was that worried about being attacked himself he wouldn’t have gone out alone at night looking for trouble. No, members of the jury, Mr. Z loaded a gun, went out looking for trouble and the predicatable outcome was the gun, loaded, with the safety off, crawled out of Mr. Z’s pocket and did exactly what Mr. Z had intended it to do.


20 posted on 04/17/2012 1:48:54 PM PDT by dblshot (Insanity: electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“That evening Martin walked to a nearby 7-11 Store where he purchased a can of iced tea and some Skittles.”

Was it ever determined that the boy purchased these items? The last I’d heard (some weeks ago) was that the store’s records of purchase for that time had been checked and there was no record of these items being sold.


21 posted on 04/17/2012 1:51:58 PM PDT by muglywump (Seven days without laughter makes one weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
What caught my attention was the mention of a “7-11 store”.

Did a quick look via goggle maps. The nearest “7-11 store” is a mile away and requires you to walk under I-4 going and coming. Quite a distance to walk for a bag of skittles and a drink. Nominal time to cover this distance would be 30 minutes with in consistent sidewalks (not always present, on one side of the street or the other, etc.).

22 posted on 04/17/2012 1:53:37 PM PDT by Nip (TANSTAAFL and BOHICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

My wife and I watched Corey’s press event announcing the indictment. She was arrogant, smug, was obviously politically motivated, and sickening. I hope she gets indicted for false arrest.


23 posted on 04/17/2012 1:57:16 PM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nip

Is walking a crime?


24 posted on 04/17/2012 2:02:56 PM PDT by kenavi (1% of the 1% were born in the 1%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Affidavit Ping


25 posted on 04/17/2012 2:04:33 PM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If Corey is up for reelection in a few months, why was she appointed to this investigation/prosecution? Are there no other prosecutors in FL who could have handled the case and who aren’t facing an election?


26 posted on 04/17/2012 2:04:51 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muglywump

Interesting observation.


27 posted on 04/17/2012 2:06:08 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

According to post #10 she isn’t running for reelection.


28 posted on 04/17/2012 2:08:56 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nice to read such an excellent fisking of this trashy affidavit. I would love to see this thing end in a career-ending contempt charge for Corey a la Nifong.


29 posted on 04/17/2012 2:18:06 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muglywump
Was it ever determined that the boy purchased these items?

I have yet to see anything about the source of that claim or evidence that it did or didn't happen.

30 posted on 04/17/2012 2:18:23 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abner; Alia; beyondashadow; Bitter Bierce; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; bwteim; Carling; ..
Ping. This just in!!


31 posted on 04/17/2012 2:31:05 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I think Zimmerman can win a suit against these legal animals. Worse than Duke....because they trumped the charges DESPITE witnesses and statements.

And she has accused him of profiling and we KNOW that's nbot true. I hope she's out in the street next week. She's a fool.

32 posted on 04/17/2012 2:49:29 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muglywump

I have asked that question in the past.

Somebody here pointed me to a story, in which a spokesman for 7-11 states that there is indeed a tape of a black man buying those items, at that store. The spokesman stated that it had been turned over to the police.

When asked what time the purchase occurred, the reply was 6:00 to 6:30.

I find that a little interesting, since Zimmerman first spots him at the clubhouse at 7:09...or at least 39 minutes for Martin to travel a mile back from the 7-11. A brisk walk would get you there in 15 minutes. A liesurely walk would take around 20 minutes. And this is on a cold wet night. To me it supports Zimmerman’s statement that he ‘was wandering around’...or not going from point A to B directly.

I have a theory...completely unsubstantiated, or course, but here it goes: St. Skittles decided to go for a walk, to the 7-11 and back...because he wanted to ‘smoke’ a little. You know, a little of that stuff he had just gotten suspended for. And, he probably wasn’t allowed to stink up Dad’s girlfriend’s place. So, he goes for the long walk, buys the munchies, and is taking it long and slow, so he can finish his smoke. Zimmerman sees him - he can’t compute why somebody would just be loitering in the bad weather, he even states to the 9-11 operator that Martin might be on drugs,...and the rest is history.

Who knows.


33 posted on 04/17/2012 2:51:23 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Or unless you think not charging now will lead to a riot, but that if your case is thrown out in six months or so thing will have calmed down. Either way it is a political decision that is disquieting.


34 posted on 04/17/2012 2:52:47 PM PDT by JLS (How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muglywump
Was it ever determined that the boy purchased these items?

Yes it was reported that the 7-11 does have tape of a person fitting Trayvon's description purchasing items. It was also reported that the tape has been subpoenaed.

What is interesting is that the media, which normally will quickly obtain copies of this type of footage from a gas station or convenience store and show it on the air, have not done so here.

Could it be that it would show a rather large person (6'2") in a hooded sweatshirt, and not the young boy whom they have created for purposes of their narrative?

Zimmerman was measured at his booking at only 5'8".

Yet the media narrative has always been of a much bigger full-grown man gunning down a young boy half his size.

35 posted on 04/17/2012 2:53:07 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abb

Thanks for the ping.


36 posted on 04/17/2012 2:55:59 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

ping


37 posted on 04/17/2012 3:00:07 PM PDT by mykroar (A vote for Romney IS a vote for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Duke was worse because they were arrested even though nothing happened, and every single piece of evidence pointed that way.


38 posted on 04/17/2012 3:09:40 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The whole purpose of this charging affidavit was to
establish probable cause but not one word of it does.
39 posted on 04/17/2012 3:12:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

“The Story Unravels: New Questions about Trayvon Martin’s Final Hour”

The public relations director could not specify the exact time of the purchase but said it was between 6:00 and 6:30.

The 7-Eleven, according to maps.google, is 0.8 miles from the entrance to The Retreat at Twin Lakes, a 16-minute walk. There is not much to see or do on Rinehart Road on a Sunday night, and it was raining hard. Even if he was not bringing the tea and Skittles to his stepbrother but was eating and sipping en route, Martin should have arrived back at his dad’s fiancée’s place before 6:50, and much earlier if he left the store closer to 6:00 than 6:30. According to logs (now deleted from the department’s website), Zimmerman called the Sanford police at 7:09:34.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/the_story_unravels_new_questions_about_trayvon_martins_final_hour.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter


40 posted on 04/17/2012 3:15:07 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Does anyone know if an autopsy was performed on Martin to determine whether or not he had drugs in his system?


41 posted on 04/17/2012 3:17:39 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
That's an interesting thought....What..he doesn't look like a cute little boy??

It would give us all a chance to see who he really is...Don't judge a book by its cover?? I don't hang with slobs or druggies....I like GOOD books.

42 posted on 04/17/2012 3:18:13 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
Angela Corey...hmmmm.....with ZERO digging, I can say two things for certainty: she’s female and liberal, and.....one thing via assumption only: she’s black.

OK You got the sex from her name. Minimal digging would reveal that she's a conservative Republican with a reputation for putting criminals behind bars. That a large number of criminals are young minority males did not make her appointment popular with progressives.

With both white and black bigots unhappy with her prosecuting Zimmmerman. it looks like she's exatly the prosector needed in this case.

43 posted on 04/17/2012 3:20:20 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

Ha, that is a great screenshot. “DA says the case should not be tried in the media”, on the Nancy Grace show — the most corrupt, biased, demagoguing Court of Public Opinion in the country.


44 posted on 04/17/2012 3:22:45 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
A photo-shopped version of the famous Nifong choke-hold photo.


45 posted on 04/17/2012 3:28:54 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

‘they fired on law enforcement officers’

Section 219 of the Texas code allows that, if the officer uses unnecessary deadly force upon someone.

The written rule of law won in that case, and the Branch Davidians were acquitted of murdering the agents.

I’m afraid the rule of written law will lose here, just like in that OJ mess.

At least no riots over that, unlike Rodney King.


46 posted on 04/17/2012 3:34:21 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
I suspect Corey is a statist AG (aspiring governor)

Could be. She's certainly a clown.

47 posted on 04/17/2012 3:49:30 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
With both white and black bigots unhappy with her prosecuting Zimmmerman.

Nothing like painting with a broad brush. If you ever make a post that isn't pure demagoguery I'll be amazed.

48 posted on 04/17/2012 3:50:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: abb

The first person I thought of when the “affidavit” was filed was Mike Nifong.


49 posted on 04/17/2012 3:52:54 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: abb

Doh, you got me. I should have listened to the little voice in my head that said, “whoa, those are some pretty big hands for a lady lawyer.”


50 posted on 04/17/2012 3:59:41 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson