Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Online Guide to the Constitution
The Heritage Foundation ^ | 4/13/12 | The Heritage Foundation

Posted on 05/01/2012 11:35:56 AM PDT by thurmant

An in-depth analysis of every clause of every section from the Preamble to the 27th Amendment.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Education; Government; Reference
KEYWORDS: constitution; foundingfathers; teaparty

1 posted on 05/01/2012 11:36:00 AM PDT by thurmant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thurmant
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

Unless you're WND, in which case you will be banned!

Indonesian Impeachment...... coming up!

2 posted on 05/01/2012 11:47:55 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thurmant

From the commentary on Article 2 Section 1.

The third qualification to be President is that one must be a “natural born Citizen” (or a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution). Although any citizen may become a Member of Congress so long as he has held citizenship for the requisite time period, to be President, one must be “a natural born Citizen.” Undivided loyalty to the United States was a prime concern. During the Constitutional Convention, John Jay wrote to George Washington, urging “a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.” Justice Story later noted that the natural-born–citizenship requirement “cuts off all chances for ambitious foreigners, who might otherwise be intriguing for the office.”

Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President. As early as 1350, the British Parliament approved statutes recognizing the rule of jus sanguinis, under which citizens may pass their citizenship by descent to their children at birth, regardless of place. Similarly, in its first naturalization statute, Congress declared that “the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens.” 1 Stat. 104 (1790). The “natural born” terminology was dropped shortly thereafter. See, e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1401(c). But the question remains whether the term “natural born Citizen” used in Article II includes the parliamentary rule of jus sanguinis in addition to the common law principle of jus soli. In United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), the Supreme Court relied on English common law regarding jus soli to inform the meaning of “citizen” in the Fourteenth Amendment as well as the natural-born–citizenship requirement of Article II, and noted that any right to citizenship though jus sanguinis was available only by statute, and not through the Constitution. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s discussion in Wong Kim Ark, a majority of commentators today argue that the Presidential Eligibility Clause incorporates both the common-law and English statutory principles, and that therefore, Michigan Governor George Romney, who was born to American parents outside of the United States, was eligible to seek the Presidency in 1968.


3 posted on 05/01/2012 11:49:32 AM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
Unless you're WND, in which case you will be banned!

Huh? When did congress make a law about WND?

4 posted on 05/01/2012 11:49:44 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Wasn't congress. It was the Indonesian.
Had a 25 year vet reporter banned from a UN conference.
Monday. http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/lockout-united-nations-shuts-out-wnd/
5 posted on 05/01/2012 12:44:07 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thurmant

Reference Bookmark.


6 posted on 05/01/2012 1:28:52 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Thanks, I hadn’t heard about that.


7 posted on 05/01/2012 2:48:15 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson