Posted on 05/09/2012 11:01:49 AM PDT by Mich1193
This can be easily veriified at https://www.iardc.org Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very strict and mean as hell.
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application.
A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you.
2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or STAND TRIAL FOR insurance FRAUD.
(Excerpt) Read more at liberty.com ...
I agree. There is enough about them which is corrupt and shady that we don't have to make things up. We should always demonstrate proof for any accusations.
I too was disappointed at the lack of supporting evidence and left a comment in that regard.
This is Michelle Obama’s original link before it was scrubbed. http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=138873458
At no time did she loose the fact that she had passed the bar and recived a law degree or that she could act as a lawyer (advisory) just could not practice in a court of law.
If she had wished to practice at court she could then and could now petition the court and the court would issue an ORDER to reinstate her after fulfilling the requirements of rule 759
Note I am not defending the Obamas I am just pointing out what the actual rules of the court state and that there is no evidence of a sanction on her record.
I am not Mitch.
Sorry for the error on my part on you name.
Here is Devvy’s article.
I wonder how many of the mindless mouth pieces giving their commentary about the “wonderful, smart First Lady,” know that in 1993, Michelle Obama, was ordered by the Illinois Supreme Court to stop practicing law? The faux First Lady was ordered by the court; it was not her choice. (Click here). The records are sealed by the court so we don’t know why, but I am told by lawyers sending me email, it had to be something major for such drastic action.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd430.htm
But the circumstances surrounding Michelle's surrender - which the author of the posted article alleges to be part of settlement of a matter in which she would otherwise be charged with insurance fraud - have not been documented, in so far as I've seen. If a judge forced her to surrender, would there be a court record of the proceeding? (Yes, I know the Obamas excel at making inculpating evidence disappear.) And if no such record exists, is there any alternative evidence for his allegation?
I'm no fan of either of them and maybe I'm missing something here, but this blogger should have at least some evidence to back up his statements.
FR had all this back in '08 but I suppose it's good to revisit.
If I understand this issue correctly, Michelle Robinson did not surrender her license under rule 759, but under rule 770. (From WND)
James Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, or ARDC, has been with the commission for 30 years. He told WND that on July 1, 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an order allowing Michelle to be transferred to inactive status pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court rule 770.
I also have this piece of information from Pamela Geller's website that says rule 770 didn't exist prior to 2004, when it was created, and the numbering system changed.
Apparently, under the rule 771 in place in 1993, it was regarding disbarment and suspension. You need to look over both rule 770 and 771 to see if you can explain this conundrum.
Pardon me if I don't find this issue so cut and dried. The available evidence suggests a real possibility that Michelle Robinson gave up her license to avoid disbarment proceedings.
Last week there was that composite commie/muzzy girlfriend Cook who’s story is quickly falling apart. Then today Hussein has finally decided he’s for same sex marriage. Naw, couldn’t be a coincidence, huh??? Yes, Virginia, on many things he is transparent.
This was posted on Freerepublic a long time ago. After that they scrubbed this one and made it read different.
The timing of this blog seems to be right?
LOLOLOLOL
Nope. This was discussed ad nauseum beginningin 2007 right here on FR.
This guy is a nOOb and all he has posted in his short time here is “his blog” Which he excerpts to drive traffic to his site.
Free Republic isn’t part of someone’s business plan and free for their use.
Both JR and the FR Community have set the terms for bloggers and they can post in the blogger section but they cannot just excerpt to drive traffic to their website.
I still call IBTZ and it will happen. The other Pimp police will be on this guy like white on rice.
I remember and it has been stated and shown on this thread that it was a court ordered surrender. Is this not correct?
It is correct but what is the definition of "court ordered surrender" and if it was indeed due to something illegal, what was it?
All their paperwork has undergone so many changes and updates I would not trust any of it.
What year did they buy the home they claim is theirs? I do not think it has ever even been listed as owned by them. Who represented that transfer? It all gets curiouser and curiouser as the expression goes.
How do they keep everyone quiet???
Everything about this bozo is fake.
I didn't realize it until I looked at the posting history that you're quite right. Not even a single page of commentary history (I've been here just under a year and even I have over 1,000 posts to my credit), with a two-year gap, and all of the posts are blog-pimp in nature.
Same here: IBTZ
You gonna zot him ace? :)
This story, coupled with Øbama's known deviant predilections, may just give fresh meaning to the 'Deep Thrøat' moniker.
1. Violence
2. Personal Attacks (blatant and repeated)
3. Racism
4. Profanity (blatant, repeated and especially, four-lettered)
I can however, still be IBTZ without being the one to personally pull the trigger.
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.