Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Town Votes Down Windmill Plan, Board Moving Ahead Anyways
Capitol Confidential ^ | 5/31/2012 | Jack Spencer

Posted on 06/04/2012 1:35:26 PM PDT by MichCapCon

Apparently elections in Huron County's Lake Township don't mean much.

In February, Lake Township voters struck down a zoning ordinance that would allow wind turbines to operate near their homes by better than a 61 percent to 39 percent margin. Yet, there's a good chance township residents will have to live next to the turbines anyway.

On May 21, the Lake Township board began a process to transfer about 4,000 acres to a neighboring township (Chandler), which has zoning that allows wind turbines. There is no way Lake Township voters could stop the transfer if the township officials go through with the process because of the way a Public Act is being used to facilitate the process. The timetable for doing the transfer could be accomplished within less than two months.

"We said 'no' when we voted on it," said Tony Kanyak, a Lake Township farmer. "It was turned down by the voters. Now a select few are doing it anyway. It's a dictatorship. Right is right, and wrong is wrong, and this is wrong."

The vote to take the first step in the transfer process was 3-2. Township Clerk Valerie McCallum cast one of the "no" votes.

"What's the point in having an election when it doesn't matter because what the voters voted for is just going to be overturned?" McCallum has been asking repeatedly in recent weeks.

Trustee Robert Osborn, who voted to move ahead with the transfer process, has argued that the February election result can be discounted because voters were allegedly misled.

But when asked if misleading claims were made by the losing side in elections, Osborn said, "that's probably so."

"I really do respect the intelligence of voters," he said. "We wanted to hold the election at a different time but someone said we couldn't. I've been getting a lot of calls on this. I'd say the majority of them are favorable. I'm not saying we're definitely going to do this (the transfer). I haven't made up my mind yet."

Osborn is an advocate for wind power.

"I'm in favor of it because I want my grandchildren to be able to breathe," he said, adding that he hopes alternative energy will also lead to the closure of a nearby coal plant.

Former Lake Township Supervisor Clay Kelterborn characterized the claim that voters were misled as insulting and inaccurate.

"They certainly don't have any consideration for what the community wants,” Kelterborn said. "Basically they're thumbing their nose at the voters. Trustee Osborn says the voters were misled. A lot of us think that's an insult. Everyone pretty much knew what the issues were. The county held a referendum on this topic about a year ago. Anyone who didn't know about this issue had to have been living under a rock."

About 20 landowners own the property that would be transferred. Of these, only seven are township residents. They all have leases for putting wind turbines on their land. These landowners have hired the law firm that introduced the transfer idea to the township board.

The idea is to use Michigan's Act 425 for the transfers, which allows portions of a township to be transferred with simple majority votes of the two township boards. Act 425 includes a way for residents to try to stop the transfer, but the plan presented to the Lake Township board eliminates that voter safeguard. This was accomplished by gerrymandering the proposed transfer map.

Located in the western quarter of the township, the land that would be transferred forms a blotched pattern of rectangular shapes. Islands of land between these areas include the homes and property of 55 residents. However, (because of the way the map was drawn) these residents would be ineligible to use the Act 425 referendum provision, even though, they'll end up living in the shadow of turbines if the transfer takes place.

Township Treasurer Dorothy Fischer, who voted for pursuing the transfer, said she was aware that the way the transfer map was drawn would assure that there could be no referendum to stop the transfer.

“They (the turbines) will not be close to their homes,” Fischer said when asked if it was fair that some residents would now have to live near the turbines. “They have to go by the rules, and they can't be built close to their homes.”

The distance required in Huron County is 1,300 feet.

Fischer said she would not end up living near the turbines if the transfer went through.

Keterborn, however, will have to if the land transfer goes through.

"We'd be surrounded by them," Keterborn said. "They'd be all around."

Keterborn also said he would expect his property value to go down.

Trustee Osborn disagreed.

"According to what I've read, property values have increased in the areas where the wind turbines are built," he said.

Jim Quinn, a Lake Township real estate agent, said he'd expect property values to go down if the turbines go up.

"Absolutely," Quinn said. "If you live next to a windmill, good luck trying to sell. What this board is doing is a slap in the face of every property owner and voter in the township. When your votes don't matter, it isn't America anymore."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: energy; green

1 posted on 06/04/2012 1:35:34 PM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Well, the Township has now learned their featherbedding, kickback-taking council is for sale. They are now responsible for ousting them.


2 posted on 06/04/2012 1:38:32 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

It seems, more and more, that elected officials are ignoring those who elected them, enacted laws, voter referendums, etc.


3 posted on 06/04/2012 1:41:52 PM PDT by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I think I’ve got a new business idea for the township: Geek’s Tar, Feather and Rail Emporium.


4 posted on 06/04/2012 1:42:33 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Never underestimate the power of government to distort markets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Is it possible to out if the board members have been attending or participating in any ICLEI program?


5 posted on 06/04/2012 1:42:57 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

how about the voters stop paying the bills? - Taxation without representation was frowned upon in these parts once upon a time...


6 posted on 06/04/2012 1:45:18 PM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The voters do not have to put up with these communists like leaders and it is their own fault. They can kick them out and tell them to get out of town. Like the old west days.


7 posted on 06/04/2012 1:45:24 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

I wonder if it is possible to sue these people on a civil basis? For what I’m not sure, Malfeasance, illegal takings under color of law? Maybe the Attorney General of Michigan can get involved?


8 posted on 06/04/2012 1:45:45 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

Rabid, nearly-rabid, or mildly-rabid liberal ideology aside. To hold a ballot initiative and tally the votes, against them, mind you, and to then proceed to engineer a legal contrivance only points to ONE thing - money, kick-backs, stock, interest, what have you. FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!!!


9 posted on 06/04/2012 1:46:14 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

referenda.....


10 posted on 06/04/2012 1:47:17 PM PDT by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
What this board is doing is a slap in the face of every property owner and voter in the township.

So slap back. When the windmills go up, tear em down.

The ONLY way this B.S. is gonna stop is to tell these bastards they can't run roughshod over the voters.

11 posted on 06/04/2012 1:48:44 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

I really would like to see this stopped peacefully. Why? Because one of these days The final Box, (Cartridge), is going to be opened and when it does it’s going to take a long time to get it closed again.


12 posted on 06/04/2012 1:49:02 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

This is why we have a Second Amendment.


13 posted on 06/04/2012 1:55:19 PM PDT by satan (Plumbing new depths of worthlessness on a daily basis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: satan

True.


14 posted on 06/04/2012 1:58:30 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The arrogance of power. We’ve represented municipalities for 25 years and there’s no place where the “big fish/little pond” complex is more apparent.


15 posted on 06/04/2012 2:06:09 PM PDT by jagusafr ("Write in Palin and prepare for war...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
"...I really would like to see this stopped peacefully...." I agree. The alternatives are always ugly. Photobucket
16 posted on 06/04/2012 2:12:29 PM PDT by lgjhn23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

>>I really would like to see this stopped peacefully. Why? Because one of these days The final Box, (Cartridge), is going to be opened and when it does it’s going to take a long time to get it closed again.

A riot is a terrible thing, but it’s about time we had one.


17 posted on 06/04/2012 2:16:19 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Years ago I lived in a lower class, white borderline poverty community, low to moderate crime. The powers that be constructed section 8 housing on the border, swearing there would be no problem, put extra police on, everything. The first week a murder was committed in the parking lot.

A few months later it was announced a 3 story section 8 housing unit would be built at the OTHER end of the same community, directly across a main east west road running right through the houses. (This is FL - everything is one story. Only commercial is tall.) It was like we were targeted for destruction - we all knew it would destroy the community. People were extremely upset.

The people were poor, but we had a community meeting - everyone gave in dribs and drabs, and we hired a lawyer someone swore could get the job done. And he did! There is now a park at that second location.

It doesn’t always happen the good way, but if the folk stick together, and are serious, there are things they can do, even when their politicians are rats. Sometimes you just have to shine enough light on cockroaches.


18 posted on 06/04/2012 2:20:55 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

If they don’t clean out the council at the next election, well, they deserve what they get.


19 posted on 06/04/2012 2:27:03 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

I think I’ve got a new business idea for the township: Geek’s Tar, Feather and Rail Emporium.
_______________________________________________________

What a great movie “For Greater Glory”.


20 posted on 06/04/2012 2:34:50 PM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 ("..... hanging from lamposts, err...... wind turbines...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
When the windmills go up, tear em down.

Here is a precedent from 1974. The town of Montague actually elected this guy to the select board later on. That's how bad Mass is...

The Montague Nuclear Power Plant was to consist of two 1,150-megawatt nuclear reactors to be located in Montague, Massachusetts. The project was proposed in 1973 and canceled in 1980,[1] after $29 million was spent on the project.[2]

On 22 February 1974, Washington's Birthday, organic farmer Sam Lovejoy took a crowbar to the weather-monitoring tower which had been erected at the Montague site. Lovejoy felled 349 feet of the 550-foot tower and then took himself to the local police station, where he presented a statement in which he took full responsibility for the action. Lovejoy went on trial in September 1974 on charges of malicious destruction, but was acquitted on a technicality.[2][3] Lovejoy's action galvanized local public opinion against the plant.[2][3]

21 posted on 06/04/2012 3:21:44 PM PDT by Peet (Everything has an end -- only the sausage has two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
When the windmills go up, tear em down.

Here is a precedent from 1974. The town of Montague actually elected this guy to the select board later on. That's how bad Mass is...

The Montague Nuclear Power Plant was to consist of two 1,150-megawatt nuclear reactors to be located in Montague, Massachusetts. The project was proposed in 1973 and canceled in 1980,[1] after $29 million was spent on the project.[2]

On 22 February 1974, Washington's Birthday, organic farmer Sam Lovejoy took a crowbar to the weather-monitoring tower which had been erected at the Montague site. Lovejoy felled 349 feet of the 550-foot tower and then took himself to the local police station, where he presented a statement in which he took full responsibility for the action. Lovejoy went on trial in September 1974 on charges of malicious destruction, but was acquitted on a technicality.[2][3] Lovejoy's action galvanized local public opinion against the plant.[2][3]

22 posted on 06/04/2012 4:45:30 PM PDT by Peet (Everything has an end -- only the sausage has two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
When the windmills go up, tear em down.

Here is a precedent from 1974. The town of Montague actually elected this guy to the select board later on. That's how bad Mass is...

The Montague Nuclear Power Plant was to consist of two 1,150-megawatt nuclear reactors to be located in Montague, Massachusetts. The project was proposed in 1973 and canceled in 1980,[1] after $29 million was spent on the project.[2]

On 22 February 1974, Washington's Birthday, organic farmer Sam Lovejoy took a crowbar to the weather-monitoring tower which had been erected at the Montague site. Lovejoy felled 349 feet of the 550-foot tower and then took himself to the local police station, where he presented a statement in which he took full responsibility for the action. Lovejoy went on trial in September 1974 on charges of malicious destruction, but was acquitted on a technicality.[2][3] Lovejoy's action galvanized local public opinion against the plant.[2][3]

23 posted on 06/04/2012 4:56:33 PM PDT by Peet (Everything has an end -- only the sausage has two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The entire idea behind popular elections is to prevent rule by force of arms. If you have a vote, you don’t win, yet you move ahead anyway, I would then expect violence to ensue. When it does, and it ends up in one of their courts, I’d also expect the perpetrators of that violence to prevail, given no other legal alternatives.


24 posted on 06/04/2012 4:57:49 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peet

Sorry for the double/triple post: Some kind of browser problem I think.


25 posted on 06/04/2012 4:57:56 PM PDT by Peet (Everything has an end -- only the sausage has two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Property values affected by windfarms in rural texas:

http://docs.wind-watch.org/gardner_wind-property-values_2_13_09.pdf


26 posted on 06/04/2012 5:21:11 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson