Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney, she affirms it’s ANYBODY. BUT. OBAMA.
The Right Scoop ^ | June 20 2012 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because it’s clear Obama doesn’t understand our constitutional process.

She was also asked about criticism that she didn’t mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFP’s legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains she’s always held the position of anybody but Obama.

Watch below Video at link:


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; palin; romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450 ... 501-531 next last
To: South40

So if you get 4 more years of Obama instead of Romney, what changes.

Both are abortionists.

Both are pro gay marriage.

But Obama is a radical communist Muslim traitor bent on transforming the USA into a socialist nation, he will re-distribute all wealth to the lower classes, he would bring Sharia law if he could, he supports it all over the middle east toppling Mubarak and Kadaffi to instill it.

So you have 2 pro gay abortionists. So you are going to defy the GOP pro gay abortionist and you will end up with the radical communist Muslim Dem pro-UN, economy wrecking, anti-oil, treasonous anti-military, pro gay abortionist.

I’m having a very hard time seeing what you gain by that.


351 posted on 06/21/2012 1:14:15 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

That is true.....the biggest bullies and harpies here do fit your description


352 posted on 06/21/2012 1:18:33 AM PDT by wardaddy (i eat more chicken than any man ever seen....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
LOL!!! That's what I think of your logic and fuzzy math. Time to rest that demented head. mitt's got you all screwy!
353 posted on 06/21/2012 2:09:34 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Both are abortionists.

Is this more of your fuzzy thinking from that mittbot head of yours.? They are NOT abortionists. Can't you get anything right? Even a first grader knows better than that!

354 posted on 06/21/2012 2:15:26 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

You’re arguing with a Moby trying to sew dissent.

Every thinking conservative understands the time to express their views is during the primaries.

Once a candidate is selected we have to face the reality of a two party system and vote for the candidate closest to our side.


355 posted on 06/21/2012 2:18:52 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Bless you nutmeg - I pray there are enough around who as smart as you and Sarah come November.


356 posted on 06/21/2012 2:47:45 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
...you bible thumping goofball...

I guess you need to be reminded about FR's mission:

Welcome to Free Republic, America's exclusive site for God, Family, Country, Life & Liberty conservatives!

You're obviously on the wrong forum, huckleberry. Back to the DUmp with you.

357 posted on 06/21/2012 3:24:49 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
Then I find out that Romney has people working the blogs.

You just hit the nail on the head, Linda!!!

358 posted on 06/21/2012 3:28:20 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Twink
And of course we should take you seriously because you’ve been here so long and proven your credentials.

More than you know, huckleberry.

359 posted on 06/21/2012 3:33:36 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Twink
The “boss?” Who would that be?

Are you that clueless?

360 posted on 06/21/2012 3:35:22 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
I'll never vote for that double-talking, two-faced, lying, mandate loving, gun grabbing, homo loving, abortion supporting POS.

So.. who are you going to vote for?

361 posted on 06/21/2012 3:57:35 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Palin won’t even say the creep’s name during public appearances

She intended to say his name, it was part of her prepared remarks.

Trouble is that she quit halfway through them.

362 posted on 06/21/2012 4:09:31 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Finny

One would think from all this blather that Mitt Romney has been cheering nonstop for PPACA, a turkey so vile that it did not get even one GOP vote in Congress.


363 posted on 06/21/2012 5:22:09 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Like I've said repeatedly (and you know this), I'll either write in Palin's name or vote for Virgil Goode, depending on my mood on election day.

Now run along and bother some bloggers....

364 posted on 06/21/2012 5:31:17 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Just like to present a possibility:

That Sarah Palin will vote FOR Rommey.

Haven’t seen that yet, but if it happens that way, it would make sense also to vote for Romney.

Let’s see how Palin votes.


365 posted on 06/21/2012 5:37:18 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Ah, another Freeper for Obama...


366 posted on 06/21/2012 5:39:25 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama

Well it's about that simple now.

1: You hold your nose and vote for Romney

or

2: You don't.

Don't waste my time with a third party. It's a joke.

If you don't vote for Romney I don't want to hear you bitching about Obama for the next 4 years.

367 posted on 06/21/2012 5:50:23 AM PDT by McGruff (Support your local Republican candidates. They are our last line of defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atc23
Bill Clinton is still Bill Clinton, he is whatever you want him to be...don't be naive!

Remember that is where moveon.org originated....remember Monica

368 posted on 06/21/2012 6:23:15 AM PDT by southphilly (Every State should be a RIGHT to WORK State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Thanks Windflier. Your comments express my thoughts too. It’s a mess. We will be relying on the other branches of our government, and I have serious concerns about a Republican House and Senate standing up to the White House, if the Republicans occupy it. That’s just how serious this is.

If Obama is in the White House, a Republican House and Senate will probably oppose him. If Romney is in there, there’s a real possibility they’ll go with whatever he proposes.

That’s why voting for Romeny is not as great an idea as a lot of people think.


369 posted on 06/21/2012 7:38:52 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Strongly disagree:

Obama will be on a no-lose junket for four more years.

Every single program he has started, will continue. Many more will grow, and every move will be met with non-stop roars of approval from the “media”.

We must un-elect Obama. Must.

Everything else can wait.


370 posted on 06/21/2012 7:43:38 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Twink

Thank you Twink. I appreciate it.

I think your take on it is logical. I understand the reasoning behind ABO. Heck, I’ve voted that way much of my life. Today we exist in an era when I’m not convinced that works any longer. Both sides are so bad.

A lot of folks are hoping that we take the House and Senate this year. I believe there is a chance this may take place, because as I understand it the Dems have more Senators standing for re-election than the Republicans do, and some of them are not solidly re-electable.

Okay, what happens if we do take both the Senate and Congress. If we still have Obama in the White House, we can oppose his treachery. If we have Romney in there, that doesn’t play. Republicans are very reluctant to oppose their president.

IMO, Romney would be able to propose some very lousy legislation and the Republicans would pass it.

I don’t like thinking of it in these terms, but this is the reality we are faced with.

The dynamics are such this year, that I don’t see a valid reason to vote for either candidate. Either way, we’re screwed.

Do I want to see Obama re-elected? Frankly, no. Do I want to see Romney elected? Frankly, no.

Food for thought...

It was my hope that we would loft a real Conservative this year, we would take the Senate, the House, and the White House. Imagine what we could have done with that.

That dream died when Romney won the primaries. It was really the death of a chance for our nation this next four years. It may be the death of it for a full eight years.


371 posted on 06/21/2012 7:52:25 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Didn’t Sarah sling a little mud at Newt?

I seem to recall she called Gingrich a “narrow minded egotistical machine goon.” ... or something like that.


372 posted on 06/21/2012 7:59:13 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I appreciate your take on it, and I’m not going to give you guff over it.

Folks wanted me to vote for Bush too. I did in 2004. Out of Bush we got another Great Society program and a financial system collapse that nearly took our nation down.

He had a Republican lock on the House and Senate for six years.

Just how much Leftist legislation did he roll back during his two terms?

I see Romney as much worse than Bush. There’s no way I can vote for him.

It’s probably going to frost a lot of people, but that’s how I see it.


373 posted on 06/21/2012 8:01:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
Didn’t Sarah sling a little mud at Newt? I seem to recall she called Gingrich a “narrow minded egotistical machine goon.” ... or something like that.

That's not what I remember.

Sarah Palin casts vote for Gingrich at Alaska caucus.

I voted for Newt also but that battle is over.

374 posted on 06/21/2012 8:12:30 AM PDT by McGruff (Support your local Republican candidates. They are our last line of defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Sarah Palin wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney, she affirms it’s ANYBODY. BUT. OBAMA.

No. If true, she affirms, like all so-called "ABOs" do, that

IT'S. ROMNEY.

375 posted on 06/21/2012 8:17:05 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=palin+gingrich+narrow+minded+egotistical+machine+goon&oq=palin+gingrich+narrow+minded+egotistical+machine+goon&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=hp.3...84.12904.1.14332.43.42.1.0.0.0.223.5108.4j37j1.42.0.eish..1.0.b6oGwhMiBAQ&pbx=1&biw=1024&bih=645&cad=cbv&sei=ozvjT9H-A8bI2wXjr4HyCw


376 posted on 06/21/2012 8:19:48 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

btw, Newt was my favorite also.


377 posted on 06/21/2012 8:20:34 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Twink

Yeah, you’re a True Bluer, all right.

I’d love to hear you describe “what I’m all about”, Twinkle. Please do-—in detail. It should be enjoyable. Because I have a feeling your definition of “suck up” is someone who actually TALKS to people on this forum, regardless of their sign-up date, and finds them friendly and likeable. You, apparently, are caught up in some mindset of cliques and “popular kids”. I outgrew that crap in high school.

Maybe you should get some fresh air, get into the real world, hm?


378 posted on 06/21/2012 8:44:56 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; presently no screen name
If the Conservative base starves Romney of votes by voting 3rd party, then he will lack the votes to win the election. So who wins if not Romney? Obama wins. So when you and many thousands of other conservatives vote 3rd party rather than Romney, you are causing Obama to win the election. By not voting for Romney, you are not stopping the election of Obama.

Excuse me, but no Republican is entitled to my vote just by virtue of being registered in the Republican party. And excuse me, my third party vote -- DO THE MATH YOURSELF -- is 100% neutral in influencing the outcome of the O v R race. Saying that my third party vote would "cause" Obama to win is not only wrong, it is entitlement mentality rearing its ugly head and posing as "logic."

Frankly, I think Obama is in as much trouble with Democrats as Romney is with Republicans. I think a lot of Democrats are going to vote third party in their disgust with Obama -- I've already seen indications of it among Democrat folks I know. It is entirely up in the air as to which one would win because BOTH are despised, though the MSM does a careful job of concealing that fact regarding Obama.

I have stood eye-to-eye with Romney's record and undertand that both morally and politically, he is off the table, as off the table as Obama is, when it comes to my vote. Yet I have a duty to vote.

I'll leave whether the winner is Obama or Romney up to those Americans willing to sanction them in enough numbers, and Obama is hugely loathed and despised by the majority of Americans, despite how the MSM tries to mislead people on that topic. So it is entirely up in the air as to which statist wins. I wash my hands of playing any part in that decision.

I cannot vote against either socialist, and neither can you. DO THE MATH.

You, like every American who casts a vote, may tell yourself that you're voting "against" something, but MATHEMATICALLY you can only actually vote FOR something or someone. You are willing to vote FOR turning the Republican party hard left and risking a disatrous landslide mandate, in order to vote "against" Obama.

MATHEMATICALLY, that is what you would be voting FOR.

I know that no matter how I vote, an anti-conservative authoritarian statist liberal who will push global warming, government-run health care, the homosexual agenda, abortion (unless you actually believe Romney's "conversion" -- hahahahah) and activist judges will end up in the White House. MATHEMATICALLY, I cannot vote "against" that and neither can anyone else.

But MATHEMATICALLY, I can vote FOR making the path as rough and rocky and difficult as possible for the winner -- and so can you. I will vote conservative Republican down ticket and third party at the top of the ticket for the sole purpose of contributing to splitting the presidential vote so that the next leftist president, Romney or Obama, gets in on a plurlaity, hopefully one so embarassing that nearly two in three Americans voted against the clown.

Fear makes people roll over and do things they regret later. Fear is the sole -- THE ONLY -- premise of ABO. ABO is a bad strategy.

379 posted on 06/21/2012 8:53:42 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Twink
And that is your right given in the US Constitution.

Romney, and most politicians, stick their fingers at “conservatives.” This ain’t church. This is real life whether you want to acknowledge that or not.

Whatever. I don’t really care who you vote for or why.

No politician has to pander to you and whatever beliefs you espouse....liberals do that. You either believe that or you don’t. I don’t give a damn if a politician panders to my beliefs or my eccentricitries...He or she works for me, not the other way around. You seem to have a victim complex, just like libs do.

No politician has to pander to your religious beliefs either.

Don’t vote for him. No one cares. I sure as hell don’t care. I’ll vote for him because Obama is the alternative and that’s not acceptable to me. As you said, keep thumping your bible....


Yes you care who we vote for or we would not be having this conversation.

I'm not asking Romney to pander to me. I just want a candidate I believe has similar values as mine. Every thoughtful voter looks for that.

Of course he does pander. They all do. He pandered to the log cabin republicans and promised them he would get gay marriage passed, that it would be a republican, not a democrats who gets it done.

Again he pandered to gays when he forced children, starting with 5 yr olds, to be indoctrinated into the gay lifestyle. If he wasn't pandering, he's perverted.

And again he pandered to gays by forcing adoption agencies to let gays adopt in MA. The Catholic Church had to stop their adoption Charities after 109 years; thanks to Romney.

He agrees with global warming. Is he pandering to the environmental wacko? Or is he just gullible enough to believe something he has not searched out the truth on.

He was for banning guns, pandering to the left. Does he believe in the constitution or not?

He was for abortion so he could be MA governor, he was against abortion so he could run for president, he was pro-abortion so he could get romneycare through, he was against abortion because he was speaking to republicans, he was for abortion because he was speaking to left leaning groups......

 Unforced by anyone, Romney overruled his own Commissioner of Public Health and lied about state law in order to compel Catholic hospitals to issue abortifacient pills. Is he pro-life, pandering to someone or just evil?

Yes, most pro-lifers are mad that he would not speak for our cause; A cause he says he agrees with. He arrogantly said we would vote for him. A least obama respects people enough to go to their events and ask for their votes. Romney is arrogant in saying this. Why would we? We have NOTHING in common with him. We see his being whoever he needs to be to get a vote. How do you know what kind of president he will be? He's like a chameleon who changes his colors according to his environment.

Be honest. Are you a Christian? A Mormon or a Mormon who calls himself a Christian? An atheist? I'm not judging you. I just am trying to figure out where you're coming from. We apparently have different beliefs and values. If your only goal to take out Obama, you have let your fears overtake you. He's not God. He can't do things that conservatives can't change back.

I am not voting for Romney because I am afraid of Obama. People who are not voting for Romney ARE voting the rest of the ticket. I will bet we will take the house and senate by a wide margin. Obama is already in so much trouble in so many ways. Anything he tries to do will be overturned. If Romney get in he will think people like his policies and will continue the things Obama has been doing. You need to step back and look at the whole picture. If we get Romney many republicans will think they need to do whatever he wants. I am so tired of calling my senator/congressman. I want a leader I don't constantly have to restrain. I also won't vote for someone who knowingly cheats to get what he wants. That is obama style politics. I use to believe in the party, no longer. They are just like the democrats and I'm sad to say many rep voters are like dem voters in that they tow the party line and believe the party lies. The party elitist are in for a rude awakening.

One last thing. Romney only talks about money. He might throw out a line about other issues, but he never strays from talking about money. My daughter law who is republican won't vote for him because he's so “one dimensional” she thinks he is all image and not substance. She does not vote because of social issues. She says she thinks he's a player but doesn't know what games he's playing. Bottom line, there is something about him she does not like or trust. This is her whole family. Many people sense he's disingenuous. She's a nurse and knows how to read people. Romney is not getting a large portion of the base. True conservatives will vote in concert for a write in candidate or en mass for a third party candidate. Sorry, we don't vote out of fear or for someone we know is wrong.

380 posted on 06/21/2012 8:54:11 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Good for you - crawl all you want on glass - Idiot.

Must be frustrating when it hits home to you that even conservative icons like Sarah Palin will do the practical thing in order to save this country this November 6th.

And it really must suck for you that all you've got left in your "quiver" now is to resort to calling fellow long-time FReepers classy names like "Idiot".

Thanks, pal.

Sit home and pout on election day - I really don't care. Your vote and the votes (or non-votes) of other so-called "principled" FReepers who plan to sit home on election day really don't matter in the long run.

If you really need some third party "principled conservative" presidential candidate to vote for on November 6th, I've got just the guy for you. Here ya go... knock yerself out:

Tom Hoefling for President

;-)

381 posted on 06/21/2012 8:55:46 AM PDT by nutmeg (I'm with Sarah Palin: Anybody But Obama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Good posts should be repeated.

Mitt Romney is not the problem any more than idiot Juan McCain was.
Don’t compare LIBERAL Romney to RINO McCain. McCain served our country! McCain didn’t initiated same sex marriage and he was not a baby killing candidate!

‘Try’ to be honest and compare liberal MITT with liberal OBAMA.

Both are godless creatures
Both appointed liberal judges
Both initiated Socialistic healthcare named after themselves!
Both are PRO abortion
Both are for same sex marriage
and Mitt both initiated it and, then, personally married many of them
Both are KNOWN LIARS
Both never served their country and neither did their family
BOTH have ‘accomplishments’ that DEGRADE America.
Both hates conservatism
Both are evil

And that list is NOT what America is about. That belongs to one nation under evil.


382 posted on 06/21/2012 8:58:44 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Ah, another Freeper for Obama...

Ah, another old-time PDS'er...

383 posted on 06/21/2012 9:07:13 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
There is no "indirect" vote. That is pretend, something people tell themselves usually to justify a vote they would never make otherwise. I've done it myself a few times -- Arnold Schwarzenegger come to mind? In short, "indirect vote" is RATIONALIZING.

You are assuming that Romney would be better than Obama. I reject that assumption having become familiar with Romney's record and projecting ahead into the probable consequences of a Romney win. They are equally dangerous for America, and it is blind fear that immediately screams back, "No they're not!!!!!" Yes, in their own ways, they are, and Romney's record DEMONSTRATES IT.

An angry person is going to blame others when things don't go their way, just as if Romney loses, you will blame those of us who refused to vote for him and went third party instead. That is anger, not logic, talking. That is stomping your foot and saying, "But Romney WAS ENTITLED to your vote!!!"

And that is your mistake. There is no voting "against," and there is no "indirect vote." They are both illusions.

384 posted on 06/21/2012 9:08:16 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; South40
But Obama is a radical communist Muslim traitor bent on transforming the USA into a socialist nation, he will re-distribute all wealth to the lower classes, he would bring Sharia law if he could, he supports it all over the middle east toppling Mubarak and Kadaffi to instill it.

Wrong. He would try to do those things.

And he would have a hard time of it if Congress was replenished and strengthened with limited government conservative Republicans, moderate Republicans turned right because of our rejection of Romney, and the plurality at the top of the ticket because of MY and others' third-party vote put Obama in office on the extreme defensive because a clear majority of Americans were on record as voting against him.

Romney, especially if he gets a landslide, would snub his fellow Republicans who were conservatives at every turn, and hail his election as a popular mandate for his brand of progressivism. He would have the GOP-e and moderate Republicans behind him, lining up with the liberal agenda. That would relegate all those conservatives we voted for down-ticket to minority status.

I'll leave the decision of which guy gets the White House to God and Americans willing to sanction anti-conservatives Obama/Romney, and do what I can to vote FOR giving conservatives as big a leg-up as possible on that enemy in the White House.

385 posted on 06/21/2012 9:22:56 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Exactly what does my opinion of palin have to do with your shilling for obama?


386 posted on 06/21/2012 9:23:03 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; Timber Rattler
Exactly what does my opinion of palin have to do with your shilling for obama?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAA!!! lolololol!!! [^)

It has to do with the fact that YOU have been covertly shilling for ROMNEY for quite awhile here on FR. Just as I suspected way back when when you willfully, deliberately misrepresented the facts in issues about Palin -- such as the bogus "profits tax" on oil companies. You were a liar then, and you are a liar now. LOLOLOL!!

BUSTED!

387 posted on 06/21/2012 9:27:04 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff
... vote for the candidate closest to our side.

Anyone -- and I mean anyone, Dem or Republican -- who reviewed Romney's record without knowing his political party affiliation, would identify him as a liberal Democrat. That is a painful but obvious TRUTH.

For the first time in 35-plus years of voting straight Republican ticket, I am seeing a Presidential election where that candidate "closest to our side" has failed to materialize under the Republican designation. Yet I have a duty to vote. I will be voting third party because the two-party system has this time FAILED to serve the interests of American freedom, and my third-party vote can help put the next president, a guaranteed anti-conservative, on defense and give conservatives in Congress an advantage.

388 posted on 06/21/2012 9:36:02 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

You are a kook.


389 posted on 06/21/2012 9:39:27 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; Jim Robinson
Ah, another Freeper for Obama...

So I guess you think JR is "another Freeper for Obama" as well?

390 posted on 06/21/2012 9:41:43 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
If you don't vote for Romney I don't want to hear you bitching about Obama for the next 4 years.

And if Romney wins in a landslide and one year into his presidency starts crushing conservative Republicans while advancing -- with the support of moderate Republicans and Democrats -- his own RomneyCare, the homosexual agenda everywhere from the military to Scout troops, liberal activist judicial picks, and a slew of environmentalist regulations to strangle energy and food production, all the while claming that HE WAS ELECTED IN A POPULAR VICTORY because Americans clearly WANTED his progressive style of governing ...

... don't come here bitching about how you really meant to vote against Obama, not FOR this statist monster who despises conservatives.

391 posted on 06/21/2012 9:47:25 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Finny; Jim Robinson
JR is a known quantity. While I disagree with his tactic I know his purpose.

On the other hand, you and the other freepers for obama are nothing but anonymous shills trying to detract votes from the only person who can get him out of office.

Why should anyone accept your anonymous efforts as being honest, especially when it is couched in chest-thumping piety? When I was a cop I saw plenty of con-men who openly carried the Bible to give their con credence.

392 posted on 06/21/2012 9:53:03 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Another mittbot speaks yet says nothing. mitt’s little mutts.


393 posted on 06/21/2012 9:53:58 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
Amen, Linda. Excellent post.

There are many, many reasons to refuse to vote for Romney. This is only one, but a very compelling one:

And again he pandered to gays by forcing adoption agencies to let gays adopt in MA. The Catholic Church had to stop their adoption Charities after 109 years; thanks to Romney.

Thank you for posting the truth. I pray that ABOers wake up in time to the huge mistake they're on the verge of being pushed to.

394 posted on 06/21/2012 9:57:59 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

:)


395 posted on 06/21/2012 9:59:32 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

PALIN / ETERNAL VIGILANCE 2012


396 posted on 06/21/2012 10:00:35 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
PALIN / ETERNAL VIGILANCE 2012

I like the first half of that equation, but definitely not the second half. What a joke, lol.

Too bad Sarah isn't running for Prez in 2012. She's not running, so it is what it is.

397 posted on 06/21/2012 10:04:37 AM PDT by nutmeg (I'm with Sarah Palin: Anybody But Obama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: Finny; unkus
Anyone not terrified of another 0bama term is not rational. .......Yep. Fear and terror are always great guides for making smart decisions. Right????????

LOL!! So the mittbots are telling us FEAR is rational! And that they are going to crawl on glass. It's obvious the 'type' evil mitt draws - mental cases.

Mitt instills FEAR to get their vote. Fear is from satan.

2 Timothy 1:7 “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

We know one thing from the Bible: Fear does not come from God.

398 posted on 06/21/2012 10:12:01 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; Jim Robinson
Thank God you're not a cop anymore because your con-man radar is broken.

You are as known a quantity to me as JR is to you. I remember how you spun the "oil profit revenue tax" lie to attack Palin here on FR, I remember the many, many facts that I and other FReepers posted to prove your lie, and I remember your lack of honor.

I suspected then that you were a Romney shill, but wasn't sure and figured that if Romney was the nominee, we'd find out by how you reacted. SURE ENOUGH, here you are. I think you wanted Romney all along, and that is why you went to such devious lenghts to knock Palin, who was Romney's biggest threat.

399 posted on 06/21/2012 10:12:38 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Thank you for that wonderful post! :^)


400 posted on 06/21/2012 10:14:55 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450 ... 501-531 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson