Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Must be frustrating when it hits home to you that even conservative icons like Sarah Palin will do the practical thing in order to save this country this November 6th.
And it really must suck for you that all you've got left in your "quiver" now is to resort to calling fellow long-time FReepers classy names like "Idiot".
Thanks, pal.
Sit home and pout on election day - I really don't care. Your vote and the votes (or non-votes) of other so-called "principled" FReepers who plan to sit home on election day really don't matter in the long run.
If you really need some third party "principled conservative" presidential candidate to vote for on November 6th, I've got just the guy for you. Here ya go... knock yerself out:
;-)
Good posts should be repeated.
Mitt Romney is not the problem any more than idiot Juan McCain was.
Don’t compare LIBERAL Romney to RINO McCain. McCain served our country! McCain didn’t initiated same sex marriage and he was not a baby killing candidate!
‘Try’ to be honest and compare liberal MITT with liberal OBAMA.
Both are godless creatures
Both appointed liberal judges
Both initiated Socialistic healthcare named after themselves!
Both are PRO abortion
Both are for same sex marriage
and Mitt both initiated it and, then, personally married many of them
Both are KNOWN LIARS
Both never served their country and neither did their family
BOTH have ‘accomplishments’ that DEGRADE America.
Both hates conservatism
Both are evil
And that list is NOT what America is about. That belongs to one nation under evil.
Ah, another old-time PDS'er...
You are assuming that Romney would be better than Obama. I reject that assumption having become familiar with Romney's record and projecting ahead into the probable consequences of a Romney win. They are equally dangerous for America, and it is blind fear that immediately screams back, "No they're not!!!!!" Yes, in their own ways, they are, and Romney's record DEMONSTRATES IT.
An angry person is going to blame others when things don't go their way, just as if Romney loses, you will blame those of us who refused to vote for him and went third party instead. That is anger, not logic, talking. That is stomping your foot and saying, "But Romney WAS ENTITLED to your vote!!!"
And that is your mistake. There is no voting "against," and there is no "indirect vote." They are both illusions.
Wrong. He would try to do those things.
And he would have a hard time of it if Congress was replenished and strengthened with limited government conservative Republicans, moderate Republicans turned right because of our rejection of Romney, and the plurality at the top of the ticket because of MY and others' third-party vote put Obama in office on the extreme defensive because a clear majority of Americans were on record as voting against him.
Romney, especially if he gets a landslide, would snub his fellow Republicans who were conservatives at every turn, and hail his election as a popular mandate for his brand of progressivism. He would have the GOP-e and moderate Republicans behind him, lining up with the liberal agenda. That would relegate all those conservatives we voted for down-ticket to minority status.
I'll leave the decision of which guy gets the White House to God and Americans willing to sanction anti-conservatives Obama/Romney, and do what I can to vote FOR giving conservatives as big a leg-up as possible on that enemy in the White House.
Exactly what does my opinion of palin have to do with your shilling for obama?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAA!!! lolololol!!! [^)
It has to do with the fact that YOU have been covertly shilling for ROMNEY for quite awhile here on FR. Just as I suspected way back when when you willfully, deliberately misrepresented the facts in issues about Palin -- such as the bogus "profits tax" on oil companies. You were a liar then, and you are a liar now. LOLOLOL!!
BUSTED!
Anyone -- and I mean anyone, Dem or Republican -- who reviewed Romney's record without knowing his political party affiliation, would identify him as a liberal Democrat. That is a painful but obvious TRUTH.
For the first time in 35-plus years of voting straight Republican ticket, I am seeing a Presidential election where that candidate "closest to our side" has failed to materialize under the Republican designation. Yet I have a duty to vote. I will be voting third party because the two-party system has this time FAILED to serve the interests of American freedom, and my third-party vote can help put the next president, a guaranteed anti-conservative, on defense and give conservatives in Congress an advantage.
You are a kook.
So I guess you think JR is "another Freeper for Obama" as well?
And if Romney wins in a landslide and one year into his presidency starts crushing conservative Republicans while advancing -- with the support of moderate Republicans and Democrats -- his own RomneyCare, the homosexual agenda everywhere from the military to Scout troops, liberal activist judicial picks, and a slew of environmentalist regulations to strangle energy and food production, all the while claming that HE WAS ELECTED IN A POPULAR VICTORY because Americans clearly WANTED his progressive style of governing ...
... don't come here bitching about how you really meant to vote against Obama, not FOR this statist monster who despises conservatives.
On the other hand, you and the other freepers for obama are nothing but anonymous shills trying to detract votes from the only person who can get him out of office.
Why should anyone accept your anonymous efforts as being honest, especially when it is couched in chest-thumping piety? When I was a cop I saw plenty of con-men who openly carried the Bible to give their con credence.
Another mittbot speaks yet says nothing. mitt’s little mutts.
There are many, many reasons to refuse to vote for Romney. This is only one, but a very compelling one:
And again he pandered to gays by forcing adoption agencies to let gays adopt in MA. The Catholic Church had to stop their adoption Charities after 109 years; thanks to Romney.
Thank you for posting the truth. I pray that ABOers wake up in time to the huge mistake they're on the verge of being pushed to.
:)
PALIN / ETERNAL VIGILANCE 2012
I like the first half of that equation, but definitely not the second half. What a joke, lol.
Too bad Sarah isn't running for Prez in 2012. She's not running, so it is what it is.
LOL!! So the mittbots are telling us FEAR is rational! And that they are going to crawl on glass. It's obvious the 'type' evil mitt draws - mental cases.
Mitt instills FEAR to get their vote. Fear is from satan.
2 Timothy 1:7 “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
We know one thing from the Bible: Fear does not come from God.
You are as known a quantity to me as JR is to you. I remember how you spun the "oil profit revenue tax" lie to attack Palin here on FR, I remember the many, many facts that I and other FReepers posted to prove your lie, and I remember your lack of honor.
I suspected then that you were a Romney shill, but wasn't sure and figured that if Romney was the nominee, we'd find out by how you reacted. SURE ENOUGH, here you are. I think you wanted Romney all along, and that is why you went to such devious lenghts to knock Palin, who was Romney's biggest threat.
Thank you for that wonderful post! :^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.