Skip to comments.Obama in a Big Hurry to Sign Oppressive UN 'Small Arms Treaty' (Next Month!)
Posted on 07/05/2012 11:16:55 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
click here to read article
F U UN....(please go away!! You are (UN)American
My prediction is that not only will "Wanted Dead" posters crop up, they'll be serious about paying out.
Hopefully, the Grand Juries (for every district) will convene and issue presentments demanding the Treason trial for all signatories. Then, try them in absentia using the signatures themselves as witnesses to the action thereby providing the "two or more witnesses to the same overt act."
And secondly, politicians will crap their pants at the new militia movement.
First of all, even if such a treaty is approved (and I think that highly unlikely), it would be illegal - no treaty can override the Constitution, only a Constitutional Amendment can do that.
Further, with regard to the Bill of Rights, the simple fact is that the Constitution was only ratified because those at the Constitutional Convention promised that the 1st Congress would take up the issue of certain basic rights and pass amendments to specifically limit government power. If one of those first 10 Amendments is voided out, then it can safely be concluded that the entire Constitution is null and void.
In the event that the treaty is passed, and the (then-illegal) central government attempted to enforce its terms against the people of this country, I believe that many articles and threads like the 2 below will not only “go viral” all over the place, but that much of the advice or information presented in them will be implemented...none of which is calculated to make it easier to govern this country.
The Art of the Cache: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1735279/posts
What Good Can A Handgun Do Against An Army (Thread 4): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/659714/posts
By the way, here’s the blog site for the author of the 2nd article: http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/
Dingy Hairy probably thinks he can do it with 51 in reconciliation. And the LSM would probably back him up. And SCOTUS.
I dont see him getting 2/3rds of the Senate for ratification.”
Always remember FReepers, 67 votes in the Senate are not required for ratification. 2/3 of Senators “present” are what's required to ratify treaties. Remember the Reich's enabling laws in 1933 were passed with the exclusion of targeted Social Democrats, Catholics etc... I would not put it past 0bama to make sure certain Senators will not be present to vote.
Revolution will come for certain, the second time for the USA.
Welcome to the second American revolution, the land of.
Remember that the first American Revolution began with government forces attempting to seize arms and supplies stored at Concord. Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.