Skip to comments.OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES
Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
click here to read article
"Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa."
Need to see the records,if not...just another UBC.
read that about an hour ago and sent it to a few in the know for confirmation....At the beginning of this research there was much talk that Kenya’s records were kept in an archive at Oxford. Recently passed that information on to others who had the resources to check it out. is this the results?....or is there more?
Where is Lord M...when we need him
Ping to claim of finding record of two BHO Sr. sons in the British National Archive recorded in colonial Kenya prior to 1963, including one in 1958 (presumably Malik) and another one in 1961 (presumably Barry).
Prior to a Hillary visit to the archive in 2009 just before she went on the Kenya the supporting details (names of babies) had been available to the public, but were then suddenly sealed under a national security statute, according to the article.
Will say this...His white mom liked men of Africa...alot. She never had time for him so she pushed little obammy off on his white grand parents to raise. I feel sorry for the socialist punk in that respect.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenyas Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obamas line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated privileged access status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
LOL. Whadda great screen name. Hope the Kenyan usurper fails.
She may have lost custody of her son, due to Lolo adoption and his return or being returned to HI. If sven’s comments about him becoming a ward of Catholic Services and grandmother being appointed guardian, it is likely her custoday was terminated.....Total abandonment is difficult for any child...but those whose parent remain in the picture often suffer even more.
The government just doesn’t want you to know, now... get over it.
I swear he flubbed the oath on purpose and Roberts knew exactly why!
He is CEO of UNITED STATES, INC.
But President of the united States of America?
Probably not, at least Constitutionally...
The burden of proof should be upon the president to show that he was not lying about his place of birth.... NOT the other way around.
To date, the media, congress, as well as the courts have upheld the notion that we must prove a negative in regards to where Obama was born. As we have seen, that process of proving the negative can literally take years...if it’s not impossible... Which is why the burden of proof positive must be provided by the applicant. (unless of course you are black and running for president)
Now it sounds like we have proof positive he was born where everybody knows he was born... in Kenya... but God have mercy on anyone who has the balls to say that the emperor has no clothes.
Well, if this is true, then it would be a bit helpful to have at least a photo of this document. Even with a copy of that document it would still be an uphill battle. Without it, this whole discussion is pointless.
Everything that is secret will be revealed, eventually. Pray.
Is Alex Haley still around to track the real “Roots” of Obama. ;-)
That blog never posts links or screenshots. Sometimes they do an inset - but that’s all. Very well written, but no source “proof”.
Glad you highlighted the area about where it is located. I’ve been shaking so much after discoverying it am almost unable to comprehend what I read.... By G..I think we’ve got it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.