Posted on 10/16/2012 4:39:23 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
*** PING ***
There is nothing that Obama could offer Hillary to fall on the sword so it must be blackmail....
Could be Huma
Could be her thesis at Welsley
Could be... any one of the deaths in her past..Vince Foster.....
Obama stash payoff.
Huma and Hussein set up Hillary to take the fall.
Huma and Hussein are allies.
Their goal has always been to resurrect the caliphate and eliminate Israel.
Huma used Hillary and was willing to munch carpet for overa a decade to advance the caliphate.
The promise of Hillary in the White House in 2016?
There is nothing that Obama could offer Hillary to fall on the sword so it must be blackmail....
Could be Huma
Could be her thesis at Welsley
Could be... any one of the deaths in her past..Vince Foster.....
Exactly, she has ZERO loyalty -nor reason to have it- at this point, so it’s either THREATS or BLACKMAIL
The Clintons were probably proud to think of how ruthless they were until the Chicago Crew came around lol
The promise of Hillary in the White House in 2016?
She took responsibility too and there was no further action taken. News dropped it off the radar, and that was that.
Same thing will happen here. Clintons already have the "crack whore" media lined up to provide cover.
“The promise of Hillary in the White House in 2016?”
____________________________________________________
Obama appears unable to secure it for himself, what credibility would a 2016 offer to Hillary have?
Also Hillary knows how short the expiration date is on an Obama promise, even if he could deliver
I think Bill and Hillary cooked this up to make O look like a fool. The Clintons did not do this for O, they did it for themselves. Very Machiavellian.
Why isn't she being asked to resign?
This is simply cover for Obama and costs her nothing.
But Americans know who is ultimately responsible.
Hillary wouldn’t do this without the permission of or even pressure from Bill. If Obama has something on somebody, it’s Bill Clinton. The question is what he could possibly have that would be bad enough to interrupt Bill’s fantastically lucrative speaking career.
The other possibility is that Obama has offered something to Bill Clinton if Obama gets reelected that Bill really wants. Having Hillary throw herself under the bus appears to them to be the only way to protect Obama, so she was sacrificed for the cause. But again, what might Bill want? Ambassador to the UN, perhaps? Something that would give him more international clout?
Obama is relying very heavily on Bill’s support and in fact in the last debate, he cited Clinton so often you would have thought he was Bill’s VP candidate. So Hillary’s pointless act had to have had Bill’s approval and may even have been his idea.
I say pointless because everybody knows that she doesn’t create any policy herself, but is a mouthpiece for Obama, who is a mouthpiece in turn for Jarrett and the other radicals. This is such a transparent set up that it makes Obama look even worse, and I think Bill may have miscalculated this time.
She’ll take responsibility up to a point.
She’s leaving her job anyway, so why not?
Silly citizen. Do you think that anybody under 40 knows who Vince Foster was, or how he died?
I respectfully disagree as Hillary wears the pants in that marriage.
Hillary is showing "leadership" by accepting blame. This contrasts with Obama who will never accept responsibility.
Hillary: Leadership
Obama: NO Leadership
Given the extreme felonies implicit in this situation, consider the fate of the nation should the kenyan still be President in February, And consider the lengths he could go to in order to ensure that he is, indeed, still the ruler in February. The only reason I can see that he might not be is that perhaps he does not yet have sufficient control of the military.
sfl
I think so. To think we had a choice of the kenyan or the clintons in 2008. McCain was never a possibility. Either he didn't want it or he got the word about the safety of him and his if he didn't take a dive. This election either marks the crucial node in the existence of the Republic or it is just the rulers beginning to fight among themselves before they have made de facto into de jure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.