Skip to comments.Gloria Allred: Violating California Rules of Professional Conduct? Perhaps.
Posted on 10/19/2012 10:24:19 AM PDT by jmstein7
Gloria Allred's solicitation practices would violate Rule 1-400(C) if she is actively soliciting clients "with whom [Allred] or [her] law firm has no family or prior professional relationship."
Upon information and belief, Gloria Allred has solicited clients in violation of Rule 1-400(C) to intentionally come forth and sully the reputation, and electoral prospects, of Herman Cain and Meg Whitman. Now, according to Matt Drudge, and others, she may be violating this rule again in an attempt to damage the campaign of Mitt Romney.
It should be noted that members of the California Bar, under Rule 1-400(F) "shall retain for two years a true and correct copy or recording of any communication made by written or electronic media. Upon written request, the member shall make any such copy or recording available to the State Bar, and, if requested, shall provide to the State Bar evidence to support any factual or objective claim contained in the communication."
It would be most enlightening, if Ms. Allred is complying with Rule 1-400(F), to see just how she finds these people to come forth for political gain, with sometimes baseless charges.
You can read the particulars of Rule 1-400 here.
“Violating California Rules of Professional Conduct”
That is her trademark!
Not a question!
I’m sure that she is waiting for Tuesday. She needs to change the subject after Romney wipes the floor with Obamas foreign policy debaucle on Monday.
Gloria has NOTHING!
She will try to pump up her own brand, but if she had anything real, she would have dumped it by now.
Gloria has NOTHING!
She had nothing on Cain either. It didn’t seem to stop her. She is a snake and totally capable of putting out a lie as long as it has traction til the election. I sooooooooooodo do not trust her.
***..., Gloria Allred has solicited clients in violation of Rule 1-400(C) to intentionally come forth and sully the reputation, and electoral prospects, of Herman Cain and Meg Whitman.***
So she’s done this before. Without consequences I presume since allred’s about to (attempt to) do it again to Romney.
In Cali it’s probably a badge of honor to violate professional ethics to hang a Republican.
Even if she was, would the California Bar do anything about it?
Allred constantly violates the ethical rules on licensing by flying around the country and claiming to be a lawyer representing various women in different states (IL, NY, etc.) outside of California. Her only state license to practice law is in California.
You cannot practice law in states in which you do not hold a license.
The candidates she smeared should have sued her into the stone age. She has never had to pay a price for what she has done. IF she does this against Romney, I don’t think he will take it for an instant.
I wonder if this is a preemptive strike on allred...Drudge setting her up so if she tries anything now, people will be looking for it. If so, it will have no affect at all and might actually cost her her law license.
You learn quickly grasshopper.;)
She could argue:
“Shooting your mouth off in front of a camera, is NOT “practicing law”!”
He, and She, who chase after ambulances...are bound to be hit by one
It would be Drudge’s greatest moment if he heads off an Allred “bogus charge” against a Republican before it happens.
Allred is just human scum
Gloria Allred: the female Al Sharpton.
So, in general, is any class action suit unethical?
Or is just finding the first client(s) unethical?
Who pays her? Certainly not the bimbos she scrapes up. Could it be the DNC or their goons?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.