And where did I argue that Romney was a winning candidate?
“And where did I argue that Romney was a winning candidate?”
Fair enough and the point was not about you, but the idea of putting forth a “winning candidate” which is the main reason Romney was the nominee.
So I will change the line: “Your argument he was electable is proven wrong” to The argument he was electable is proven wrong.
I was not trying to criticize you personally at all and meant only to address the issue of “winning candidate” and how the “winning candidate” approach sure didn’t work.