Skip to comments.Obama effort to strip constitutional gun rights may start American Civil War
Posted on 11/16/2012 5:18:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Are you ready to wake up in an America where your family is defenseless against enemies foreign or domestic? This reality is right around the corner. A day after his reelection, Barack Obama signaled the United Nations that he is ready to sign an Arms Treaty to strip you of your U.S. Second Amendment Constitutional right to bear arms.
This is not new. The United Nations made earlier attempts during the administration of former President George W. Bush. But, President Bush soundly rejected the measure. Now, President Obama, fresh off of this presidential win, feels emboldened to go forward with his design to unilaterally dismember the guaranteed constitutional protections citizens of this nation are entitled to.
Do you feel comfortable with the idea that the U.S. State Department under the control of either Ambassador Hillary Clinton will truly represent your interest? What about her possible replacement nominee, Americas United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice? This is the same Ambassador Rices who went on five television network shows to cover up the truth of what happened to four Americans murdered on 9/11 in Benghazi, Libya.
Where does that leave Americans?
The real question is what are you prepared to do in order to defend your right to defend your family? Will you wait to see what happens? Or will you take the necessary steps to make certain that you will not have to wait and see if United Nations gun control officials knock at your door, demanding, and Gun license and registration, please!
The right to control your guns is not open for debate or for negotiation. It is a sovereign right that no foreign organization, including the United Nations has the right or the authority to undertake, because a president gives the go ahead....
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
They're out of luck. All my guns and ammo were lost in a tragic boating accident...
If Obama signs it, that is directly impeachable.
Of course, nobody would impeach him, but it would still be constitutionally impeachable.
A LOT of people... maybe into the thousands or tens of thousands will have to literally die because of Obama’s blatant incompetence before anyone will have the guts to remove him from office.
I guess there are a multitude of lake/pond bottoms chuck full of lost guns and amo. ;-)
And I will never get over the awful out house accident. They can go get them if they want
Remember, the President cannot unilaterally sign a treaty. Treaties require the approval of the senate. The examiner article is nothing more than blatant fear mongering.
I know, I was there with you in that airboat and lost every gun I owned. At least we got that gator, though...
Doesn’t the next senate have a Democrat majority? Isn’t Harry Reid still the ramrod?
I believe it would require more than a simple majority vote to ratify.
IIRC...it takes a 2/3 majority to approve a Treaty.
I’ll give em mine one bullet at a time...
For a while now I have been predicting that there will be a second civil. At least I am not alone.
They have so-called Republicans like Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Scott Brown.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
You mean the 'Harry Reid' Senate? Think about that; it's not fear mongering, it's appropriate concern!
He’s a coward. Get enough people marching in Washington and he would back down.
What army, the UN? Really now.
The Dems have a 55-45 majority in the Senate, which the legislative body that approves/disapproves treaties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.