Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/01/2013 4:44:52 PM PST by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Starman417

O.W.S....
Pelosi
Obama...

Traitors of a Feather....


2 posted on 01/01/2013 5:15:29 PM PST by LtKerst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

O.W.S....
Pelosi
Obama...

Traitors of a Feather....


3 posted on 01/01/2013 5:15:46 PM PST by LtKerst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
Colbert did a great sendup of OWS not long after it started.Search “ketchup” on youtube and you'll find one of the spokescreatures (who described herself as “a female bodied person” to Colbert).To quote the “psychiatrist” in an episode of Fawlty Towers (after seeing Fawlty acting strangely) “there's enough material there for an entire conference”.
4 posted on 01/01/2013 5:27:45 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

I have embraced the philosophy of solipsism. I do not understand why it has not become more popular.


5 posted on 01/01/2013 5:41:36 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a baby girl's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

On the Dailymailuk site, it’s reported that both of them are heroin addicts. I hope it isn’t true for the baby’s sake.


6 posted on 01/01/2013 5:45:58 PM PST by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
I don't think 0bama or anyone on his staff is actually an anarchist, although they're happy to use OWS idiots for a little demagoguery. They're something quite other than that - they're cadre. Why bother with anarchy when you're already the government?

Lenin explained it. Naturally Communism is a people's movement, but someone has to be in charge of the movement - the cadre, the intellectuals, the technocrats, the ones who must lead the movement until Marx's promise that the State magically withers away comes to pass, which it never does. What does happen is the advent of a new ruling class. Milovan Djilas described this in The New Class. In Marxian terms, the inevitable progress of history appears actually to devolve, from feudalism to capitalism and back to feudalism again, where the ruling class is kept in place by the same knout and gun that kept the previous one in place prior to the Revolution.

0bama, Jarrett, Ayers, Dohrn, all of these people have no intention of becoming part of the masses. Nor have they. They have no intention of getting rid of the parasites in the incredibly feckless Emma Goldman's essay, they intend to replace them. And to a very great degree, they have done so, as any brief glance at 0bama's vacation schedule should make perfectly clear.

Anarchists, no. Cadre, yes. Ruling class, yes. But the beast they're riding is starting to stagger, and we'll be under it when it falls.

8 posted on 01/01/2013 5:48:55 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson