Skip to comments.
"I don’t want to hear from any political moron who demands conservative purity." Bob Grant
Bob Grant Online ^
| 1.11.2013
| Bob Grant
Posted on 01/11/2013 8:19:13 PM PST by USconserv
"Mitt should have picked Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey as his running mate. Christie knows how to hit back. I only hope that by 2016 the GOP is smart enough to vote for Governor Christie. If they dont pick him, then they might as well forget about being a national party. They can also forget about guys like me.
There will be no point in allowing Hillary Clinton to pull another phony campaign out of her purse. I will be watching my fellow Republicans. And I dont want to hear from any political moron who demands conservative purity. Those days are long gone. Forget it. And you Republicans also need to forget about identifying yourselves as a certain specific Republican. You dont see the Democrats bifurcate themselves."
(Excerpt) Read more at bobgrantonline.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: bobgrant; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
1
posted on
01/11/2013 8:19:30 PM PST
by
USconserv
To: USconserv
Mr. Grant fades into obscurity now. You either stand for something or fall for liberalism.
2
posted on
01/11/2013 8:23:02 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: USconserv
3
posted on
01/11/2013 8:23:20 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
To: USconserv
Krispy Kreme in your dreams.
4
posted on
01/11/2013 8:24:31 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: USconserv
As much as it pains me to say this, Bob Grant is wrong.
5
posted on
01/11/2013 8:25:08 PM PST
by
Buddy Sorrell
( John Boehner is our Pierre Laval. We need a Charles DeGaulle.)
To: USconserv
The same Governor Chris Christie who kissed Obama’s butt, and handed the election to him?
6
posted on
01/11/2013 8:25:57 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
To: USconserv
As much as it pains me to say this, Bob Grant is wrong.
7
posted on
01/11/2013 8:26:19 PM PST
by
Buddy Sorrell
( John Boehner is our Pierre Laval. We need a Charles DeGaulle.)
To: USconserv
To: USconserv
“And I dont want to hear from any political moron who demands conservative purity. Those days are long gone. Forget it.”
We are all Progressive Oppressors now, just different types of lefties, and don’t you forget it!
9
posted on
01/11/2013 8:27:43 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: USconserv
“Conservative purity” when talking about Romney?
I may be mistaken here, but to be pure use must be that substance — and Romney is no conservative... unless you mean it in the sense of “keeping things the same”.
10
posted on
01/11/2013 8:27:59 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: USconserv
Then there is no point in voting GOP. If they aren't conservative, they don't get my vote.
Bob's purity test is that there be no purity.
/johnny
To: USconserv
It will be interesting to see if he ever subs for Levin again.
12
posted on
01/11/2013 8:29:38 PM PST
by
berdie
To: USconserv
WOW If another moderate Republican is picked by the GOPe next time, they will lose again.
It’s that simple.
13
posted on
01/11/2013 8:30:19 PM PST
by
svcw
(Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
To: USconserv
The Legendary who? He might be right, but I can’t get beyond his arrogance.
Elect Christie? Yeah, right...so are we to believe that all the hand-shaking, hugging and HUGE smiles for the Oba-Messiah was only politics ‘cuz the “fighter” Christie needed the bucks that the Oba-Messiah would need to release. Puhlease!
14
posted on
01/11/2013 8:30:39 PM PST
by
NCDragon
(If you can't stand behind the troops, try standing in front of them!)
To: USconserv
Well, Bob, I may not demand purity, but I will demand a conservative. A conservative is something Chris Cristie is not and never has been.
I’ll also tell you what since I’m up on the soapbox. The GOP-E told us all that after McCain we had to run a Republican from the Northeast to have any chance of winning. Well, his name was Mitt Romney and while he may have been a Republican he was not demonstrably a conservative in any sense of the word, nor was he a capable campaigner outside of New England, which really didn’t do him any good.
Now that the same GOP-E wants to push a man who is “not nice” to go along with not conservative. They’ll be lucky to hold Alabama if they do and will deserve the loss if they don’t.
The next Republican Presidential candidate needs to be the sort that will campaign against the incestous corruption in Washington, D.C. and has the credentials to back their claim that they’ll clean house. They need to present problems clearly and articulate answers that will work. They must fundamentally believe in America and be able to stir Americans to believe in their country. Right now, only one person that might fill that role is anywhere to be seen. Bloodied and Battered but still standing and still fighting.
That person sure isn’t Cristie.
15
posted on
01/11/2013 8:37:15 PM PST
by
Hawk1976
(It is better to die in on your feet than it is to live as on your knees.)
To: USconserv
I don’t think Mitt wanted to do anything that might have caused him to win.
16
posted on
01/11/2013 8:41:30 PM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
To: USconserv
This statement could be defended perhaps, if this were March of 2016, but it isn’t.
Two months after the 2012 election, Bob Grant is already campaigning to move the party left for when we start the primaries in a couple of years.
Weird, weird, weird, what in the heck is going on?
17
posted on
01/11/2013 8:44:19 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Cruz said "conservatives trust Sarah Palin that if she says this guy is a conservative, that he is")
To: USconserv
He who stands for nothing will fall for anything. ― Alexander Hamilton
18
posted on
01/11/2013 8:45:14 PM PST
by
bimboeruption
(Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
To: USconserv
Yeah, RINO candidates have worked so well for the GOP. What’s the definition of insanity?
19
posted on
01/11/2013 8:47:27 PM PST
by
Huskrrrr
To: USconserv
I was surprised to find out how many republicans I know who didn't vote in 2012. They don't like obama, but they don't like Romney either.
If Romney couldn't motivate them after four years of obama to avoid another four years by voting for him, how would a governor from N.J., especially after his slobber fest over Bruuuuce and Barry, change that outcome?
I'll tell you how, even fewer voters and votes and maybe even a loss of the House thanks to even more GOP voters staying home.
We love a fighter, but only if they are fighting for us, not against us. Those stay at homers didn't trust Romney and they certainly don't trust Christie, imo.
A party that loses to a hard core leftist like obama twice has the wrong ideas about what their voters believe in and want from government.
20
posted on
01/11/2013 8:54:41 PM PST
by
GBA
(Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
To: USconserv
I don’t think Christie is right on several important issues either. But I like the guy. I would have given a paycheck to see him debate Obama.
21
posted on
01/11/2013 8:54:41 PM PST
by
wolfpat
(Not to know what has been transacted in former times is to be always a child. -- Cicero)
To: USconserv
conservative purity? that’s a joke. at this point I’d welcome even a charging RINO. all we have now are retreating RINOs
To: GBA
Real simple for Bob. DLTDHYAOTWO
23
posted on
01/11/2013 8:56:32 PM PST
by
JCBreckenridge
(Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
To: USconserv
Christie was bland and a disappointment at the Convention. When he went on one of the late night talk shows and mocked Clint Eastwood’s appearance, he was playing into the lefty’s hands. And please: no more Springsteen!
24
posted on
01/11/2013 9:01:38 PM PST
by
ConservativeStatement
(Obama is the "Disco Duck" president. A no-substance novelty that reached number one.)
Grant’s an establishment guy.
To: USconserv
Not only do I want conservative “purity” , there are 5 million of us that will have it or this country will never have another republican president EVER!! So get over it.Ted Cruz is yet undefined but I think I like him. That means he might win. But if you jerks keep putting up Bob Doles and Bushes, McAmnesties and Romneys, Your finished and we are kicking you out of our party!! No more tax raising Sanunus— No more Karl marx Roves. NO MORE RINOS !! GET OUT OF OUR PARTY — You have ruined it, God Bless.. Get the hell out!!
Boehner and McConnell have one last chance to save your career. NOW!! NO COMPROMISE. CUT SPENDING OR SHUT THIS COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT DOWN!! , You are ruining our children’s future. WAKE THE HELL UP!!
To: plain talk
The only thing RINOs ever charge at are Conservatives.
To: USconserv
Who is Bob Grant and why is he using Alinsky tactics against conservatives?
28
posted on
01/11/2013 9:06:40 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
( "I ask sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few politicians."-George Mason)
To: USconserv
I thought there might be an outside chance that Romney might be tolerable, so I voted for him. I have no such hopes for Christie.
29
posted on
01/11/2013 9:12:28 PM PST
by
Gil4
(Progressives - Trying to repeal the Law of Supply and Demand since 1848)
To: USconserv
"Mitt should have picked Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey as his running mate. Christie knows how to hit KISS back.
30
posted on
01/11/2013 9:24:33 PM PST
by
Baynative
(Those that work for a living are now outnumbered by those that vote for a living.)
To: USconserv
Someone remind this jackass and all his followers who share his attitude are the people that kept electing compromisers who went ever leftward.
Now that we face the communist in the WH, all ‘we’ have is people that can’t wet their lips fast enough to place on Democrat tail.
The opposite of purity is corruption.
That is a simple fact and no whining by the pussified will change that reality.
To: fieldmarshaldj
To: Hawk1976; svcw
Who is your pick for 2016? I know it is early, but I am sure you have given it at least a passing thought. So, elucidate me and others here on who are at top of your list. I know it is not Christie.
My list has McConnell, Scott, Rubio.
33
posted on
01/11/2013 9:34:36 PM PST
by
entropy12
(The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
To: USconserv
Whether one agrees with him on everything or not, Bob Grant is a legend. I remember hearing him on the radio in San Diego out of LA nearly 50 years ago!
34
posted on
01/11/2013 9:55:36 PM PST
by
luvbach1
(We are finished.)
To: USconserv
ROTFL.
Christie’s base starts and stops on the North East Coast.
35
posted on
01/11/2013 10:09:13 PM PST
by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: USconserv
Good Lord. CHRISTIE???!? That way we could simply have been given the choice between Democrats, and Obama/Biden??!?
Grant is a twitface.
36
posted on
01/11/2013 10:13:01 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
To: entropy12
Well, since it's only January 20
13.....good lord - really a pick.
NOPE!
It's to damn early lets at least get through the next election before we pick someone.
I can tell you it will not be LIBERAL.
37
posted on
01/11/2013 10:17:11 PM PST
by
svcw
(Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
To: USconserv
Why? What is it with these commentators? Do they not have friends on Facebook? Do they not see the propaganda from the left during the campaign?
No matter how ‘middle of the road’ (read: liberal) the candidate is, he or she will be painted as a drooling religious fundamentalist who seeks to restore life to that of the 1840’s. Blacks on the plantation, women locked up for speaking in public. It is the ultimate in projection: this is how the left would treat the world if they ever could fully gain control.
I seriously saw posts on facebook with people saying that should Mitt Romney win the presidency, he would immediately outlaw abortion. This of the former governor who made RomneyCare and the $50 abortions. Who made it state law that every pharmacy must, upon demand, and without doctor’s prescription give out ‘morning after’ pills.
The guy with a gay campaign manager who would force gays back into the closet. The man who’d ‘force us back into the dark ages’ who wanted his campaign victory speech to be in the heart of liberal country.
At least run a campaign with someone who can articulate the conservative viewpoint, rather than someone who when even slightly challenged in a campaign debate immediately blurts out that he likes big government mandates, that they supposedly work.
Oh, no, let’s instead stop seeking ideological purity and instead choose someone more liberal. I’m sorry, but I don’t think we had anyone more liberal than Mitt Romney running around last election. I suppose we could have drafted the Huckster, or called up Rudy to the bat, but I’m pretty sure neither of them enacted homosexuals calling themselves married.
38
posted on
01/11/2013 10:40:52 PM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: USconserv
Bob Grant is online, but off his rocker. I don’t want to hear from HIM. Moron.
39
posted on
01/11/2013 10:48:47 PM PST
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: USconserv
Who the HELL is Bob Grant? Another stinkin'
"Establishment Republican" ?
Wake up, RINO !
Liberalism is UNACCEPTABLE !
I read
a great article by Sheriff Jim R. Schwiesow, Ret. written February 4, 2011 from "NewsWithViews.com" and here's part of it.
COMPROMISE A DIRTY WORD
Compromise is defined as:A middle way between two extremes
If this is a literally correct definition, and I believe that it is,
what then are we to do when the two extremes at the opposite ends of the plane arethat which is moral
and that which is immoral?
Is it possible that a righteous compromise can be accomplished
when such a compromise, by the very definition of the word, must contain the elements of an extreme that is in and of itself evil or wicked ?
Compromise is as old as humanity;compromise began as a human endeavor to attempt to escape the penalty for the transgression of Gods laws
and to mitigate or contravene the absoluteness of Gods word.
Compromise is mans wayto lessen the seriousness of disobedience to immutable laws and dictums,
or to excuse or condone such disobedience altogether.
No good thing comes from compromise.
Mans accommodation of transgressions by compromise is not a defense for iniquitous acts in the eyes of God.
Compromise is the devils invention;God who is perfect in every way will not be conciliated by the conditions of a compromise.
Compromise was introduced into the lives of men in the Garden of Eden by that serpent of old, Satan,
and will remain with men until the Lord Jesus Christ brings this world to an end - which He will inevitable do - and establishes His Kingdom.
THE FRUITS OF COMPROMISE
Most people have come to believethat compromise is a useful tool
and that the negotiations thereof have brought about good things and useful policies.
If one examines that belief closely it soon becomes apparent thatthere are no useful results that accrue to negotiated compromise on any level.
In fact most oftencompromise actually breeds dissention and strife,which in turn leads to more compromise.
In short compromise feeds upon itself and eats up that which is just and right in the process.
To live in a world of compromise is to live in a world without absolutes,
and yet we know that the entire universe as well as the lives of men are managed, controlled, and kept within irrevocable bounds by the absolutes established by Almighty God.
We violate those bounds, via compromise of any kind, at our peril.
Political negotiations (compromise) in regardto the step down from the safeguarding of the sanctity of life
and from the immutable right granted by God to be defended against being murdered -as set forth in the sixth commandment
- has enabled an American medical assassination machinethat has claimed nearly double the number of lives of the combined number of military and civilian deaths attributable to World War II.
The killing of innocent babies has reached record heights.The lives of twenty-four percent of all unborn babies are delivered into the hands of the serial killers of the medical community.
A baby is murdered every twelve seconds,
and it is estimated that in this country alone there have been ninety-two million living beating hearts stilled by the bloody hands of the legal abortionists.
This conspiracy to commit murder,this aiding and abetting of murder,this disconnect between the forbidden pre-meditated murder of living adults and the sanctioned pre-meditated murder of living babies
has been wrought by a politically mediated compromise betweenthose who claim the right to murder babies
and those who know Gods absolute prohibition of murder.
And there is more.
Now continuing
compromise on morality resulted in the condoning of, and an exponential increase in, the filthy - God condemned - practice of sodomy and promiscuous sex.
For every compromise of Gods word a penalty is exacted.
Aids rapidly achieved endemic proportions, first in the United States and then in the rest world.
We were told that Aids was a disease of monkeys that had migrated to men.
The inventiveness of the scientific community and the political apologizers who defend such appalling and execrable behavior
often find fertile ground in the credulous minds of a spiritually deprived people.
Im not done.
POLITICAL COMPROMISE CONTINUES TO DESTROY THE REPUBLIC
Today as never before in our history the dishonorable who control our social destiny via their political intrigues
subject the nation to a slow death by way of political compromise.
Compromise through ill-conceived trade agreements has destroyed domestic industry and extinguished millions of jobs.
Compromise on sound financial practices has destroyed the housing market, seriously damaged the economy and crippled small businesses.
Compromise on immigration has demolished the social structure, bankrupted state and local governments, critically imperiled national security and jeopardized the safety and well-being of the people.
And compromise on moral integrity has corrupted the youth, encouraged extreme vice and given license to social prurience.
THE BEGINNING OF THE END
In a recent article I wrotethat from this time forwardthe people of this nation will not know a day of peace,
there will be no good news, each bad day will fade into another equally bad day,
and the black and ghostly apparitions of the former will blend with the grim and ghastly tidings of the new.
The Lord has departed from a people that have departed from Him and prostituted themselves before heathen gods,a people who will in the coming days loathe themselves for the evils that they have committed in all of their abominations.
They will surely know that He is the Sovereign God who will carry out His wordto do evil unto them that defy His word and deny His Lordship over all of creation.
As I write this piecethe nation is seized by a 2,000 mile long arctic blast of an unprecedented magnitude;
each season delivers devastation of Biblical proportions.
Tornadoes ravage, floods inundate, conflagrations gobble up thousands of acres of trees and foliage and lumbering mudslides follow in the wake of these,
hurricanes terrify the coasts, and hail, ice, and snow bring cities and towns to a standstill.
Truly the day of the Lord is at hand.
One who reads these words and does NOT understand or relate to that which has been written
can be thought to possess one or more of the following character deficiencies:deep perversion, callous indifference, abysmal illiteracy, or appalling ignorance.
Believers in Gods word knowthat ignorance of a secular kind is directly attributable to a lack of spiritual discernment.
Solomon gives a litany of dangers that await the man who lacks Spiritual discernment:
To deliver thee from the way of the evil man, from the man that speaketh froward things;Who leave the paths of uprightness,to walk in the ways of darkness;
Who rejoice to do evil, and delight in the frowardness of the wicked;Whose ways are crooked, and they froward in their paths:
To deliver thee from the strange woman, even from the stranger which flattereth with her words;Which forsaketh the guide of her youth, and forgetteth the covenant of her God.
For her house inclineth unto death, and her paths unto the dead.
None that go unto her return again,neither take they hold of the paths of life.
That thou mayest walk in the way of good men, and keep the paths of the righteous.
For the upright shall dwell in the land, and the perfect shall remain in it.But the wicked shall be cut off from the earth, and the transgressors shall be rooted out of it.
A modern translation:
"Wicked and perverse men are scattered like land mines across the paths of our lives.
Without discernment we will soon be following them into the dark of destruction.
The adulteress, every mans worse nightmare, will seduce those who cannot see past her beauty and promises.
Behind her attraction lies the steps that descend to hell.
No one who goes to her returns,but how can anyone know this apart from God Himself telling us."
40
posted on
01/11/2013 10:51:51 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: USconserv
Senility is a sad thing to behold.
41
posted on
01/11/2013 10:55:06 PM PST
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: svcw
Well DUH, I know you won’t go for a liberal..neither will most here. But you have absolutely no one you are rooting for?
42
posted on
01/11/2013 11:30:56 PM PST
by
entropy12
(The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
To: USconserv
They can also forget about guys like me. Not a problem Bob. Thirteen years of reading conservative news and this is the first time I've ever heard of you. Bye.
43
posted on
01/11/2013 11:37:09 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Who is John Galt?)
To: USconserv
44
posted on
01/11/2013 11:56:39 PM PST
by
mirkwood
To: USconserv
I remember hearing this about President Weld and President Giuliani.
And keep off Mr. Grant’s lawn!
45
posted on
01/12/2013 1:41:33 AM PST
by
Forgotten Amendments
(I remember when a President having an "enemies list" was a scandal. Now, they have a kill list.)
To: USconserv
If we had had a Preidential candidate that knew how to hit back, we wouldn’t have “needed” Christie. He’s great for NJ, but nationally we need someone more conservative than either Romney or Christie.
46
posted on
01/12/2013 1:48:30 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: wolfpat
We need a candidate with his Christie’s debating skills, but without many of his rino tenancies.
Bob Grant was a conservative voice in the wilderness for many years, but he is wrong here.
Christie is wrong on too many core issues and should never be our candidate for President. He is the best that can be produced in New Jersey, but he will not be acceptable outside of the Northeast.
47
posted on
01/12/2013 2:43:15 AM PST
by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: USconserv
Just how much is this idiot will to give up? We may as well be democrats.
48
posted on
01/12/2013 2:51:05 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: 3Fingas
Exactly. You said what I meant.
49
posted on
01/12/2013 3:22:27 AM PST
by
wolfpat
(Not to know what has been transacted in former times is to be always a child. -- Cicero)
To: USconserv
Christie is a liability. His ego is bigger than his brain, and he talks without thinking.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson