Sort of. He has verified some info (e.g. BHO name and birth time), but not other (e.g. birth date or parents names). I believe his precise words were that the "information matches". Didn't say "all information matches" or "identical" (the latter was asked by some SoS but not answered). So we are left with a paper record of some sort for BHO in the book. We don't know what is on it, but it is pretty clear there is a piece of paper there dating from 1961. It was was likely xeroxed twice and stamped and sealed and carried to the WH. After that we don't know what they did with those copies.
Palmer, you’re not listening. Verifying that something is on a piece of paper is not the same thing as verifying that what’s on the paper is true.
Especially since the BC#’s given for Obama and at least 3 other people cannot be what were on those BC’s in 1961, if we believe either of the contradictory numbering methods we’ve been told were used at the time. The only way Obama could have #10641, given what we’ve been told, is if that BC# is on a totally fabricated NEW BC created at the request of law enforcement - in which case every item on that BC will say whatever law enforcement (Eric Holder?) says it will say. Including the filing date.
IOW, we have good reason to believe that the HDOH BC that Onaka is talking about here is a complete fabrication.
In any event, Onaka would not verify birth facts he was asked to verify even though he acknowledged that those were the claims on the BC. So at the very least we know that the BC Onaka is looking at is non-valid. That’s all we need to know.