Posted on 01/19/2013 9:24:38 AM PST by maggiesnotebook
Not a problem.
Here’s some side orders, like a casual order of fries
http://thegovernmentrag.wordpress.com/tag/libor-scandal/
http://investmentwatchblog.com/wall-street-mom-nancy-lanza-was-morgan-stanley-investment-broker/
Keep in mind the police chief in his interview answered NO questions but had a news conference on nothing. He also said thier is a lot of misinformation out there that will be traced and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Its been about a month now and they are still putting thier story together, quick call “zero dark thirty” hollywood they could do it quicker and according to an agenda
Link just takes me to a list of unelated recent videos.
I know a lot of damage can be done with handguns. That what many of us have been saying for a long time: “assault weapons” are not unusually dangerous, and it’s the person using it that’s the problem.
And this whole push isn’t about saving lives, it’s about establishing tyranny.
<>Its been about a month now and they are still putting thier story together<>
That’s not true. After the smoke of the tragedy and misreporting subsided that day, the Sandy Hook shooting appeared on wikipedia within days and has not changed much since then:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting
One constant on FR and other Con sites is the “Concern Troll”. You qualify with your pitiful concern about Con reputations when the lying BS from the left is stacked miles high. BTW, the Sandy Hook Op was as fraudulent as your concern for reputations.
Click on the photo of Adam Lanza, or this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8004316/ns/video/#50208495
The information about the Sandy Hook shooting was all over the map.
I’m willing to grant that the “concern troll” probably does exist.
However the far bigger danger is the “conspiracy theorist nutjob,” for whom everything is a conspiracy.
The conspiracy theorist nutjob can’t be reasoned with. The real, objective truth really doesn’t matter to him, although he often claims to be “just seeking the truth” or “proclaiming the truth.”
He doesn’t even care (very much) about the Constitution - although he often labels himself a “Constitutionalist” and labels everyone who disagrees with his mangling of that same sacred document a “traitor” or a “troll.”
There is no event that the conspiracy theorist nutjob can’t find a conspiritorial explanation for. Muslim fanatics can hijack airplanes and fly them into skyscrapers, and have their associates admit that they did it for the cause of Islam, and the conspiracy theorist nutjob will claim the President of the United States was in on the plot.
A crazed 20-year-old gunman (either off his meds or because of them) can murder his mother and steal her firearms and go slaughter elementary school children, with the entire drama played out live on television, and the conspiracy theorist nutjob will claim that it was all a government conspiracy of some kind.
Idiots in the media can misreport the weapons used in their rush to get some news, any news, out there before their competition, and the conspiracy theorist nutjob will dig up erroneous early reports a month later, and claim that they’re actually accurate, and that they’re “evidence” of a conspiracy.
And reasonable people can point out the truth, and the conspiracy theorist nutjob will turn on the truth-teller as if he is an enemy, a part of the imagined conspiracy, the spawn of Satan himself.
Conspiracy theorist nutjobs do nobody any favors, and the least of all whatever side of the political spectrum they claim to represent. And those conspiracy theorist nutjobs who call themselves “conservatives” don’t, in reality, represent conservatism. They only represent nutjobbery.
You are more than a concern troll, you are living under the bridge troll, take your “conspiracy theorist nutjob” and stuff it. We are facing a very dangerous foe that wants to relieve us of our freedoms and you are concerned.
That's one really good way you can identify a conspiracy theorist nutjob.
See if you can figure out whether this applies to anyone you know.
Thanks for the trollish Spawn of Satan response.
The other thing that I notice about those who are prone to conspiracy theories is that they are unrelenting in their demonization of other people. If anyone disagrees with them, then that person is assumed to be a part of the imagined conspiracy. He is “evil.” He is demonized.
Aside from it being just plain counterproductive (and I would frankly say evil) to demonize fellow conservatives, it’s really pretty arrogant. The conspiracy theorist presumes to know the inner motives of a person he has never met and has no acquaintance with. He presumes that he, in his great wisdom, can accurately identify that person’s motives as being false. Nothing the person himself says matters. He is presumed guilty until proven innocent, and there is no proof that is ever good enough for the conspiracy theorist. It is all met with, “Yes, but...”
In this instance, the person demonized by the conspiracy theorist did little more than point out the truth. The truth is undeniable. The conspiracy theorist does not even contest it. And yet the person pointing out the truth is somehow a “troll,” evil, the “spawn of Satan”... for having pointed out the undeniable truth.
Bizarre. But that’s the world of a conspiracy theorist.
After watching this video....I also tried to look up the calendar of events on the Connecticut gov website and for some reason...the year 2012 is not available. I really want to know about that photoshopped picture, the supposed gunman they caught in the woods, the facebook posts dated early and the fake actors. After Fast&Furious, I put nothing past this administration!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-mlszDIRZb0
Hey dipwad you started in with the ‘Spawn of Satan’ BS. Take a hike along with your juvenile ‘conspiracy’ analysis.
No, actually YOU were the person who started this dialogue, by bizarrely and falsely accusing me of being a “concern troll” and “fraudulent.” Those were completely unsolicited comments on your part, directed toward a poster whose “crime” was to point out the truth.
My characterization of how conspiracy theorists treat their fellow human beings, even their fellow conservatives, was spot-on - as shown by your behavior in this thread.
No, actually YOU were the person who started this dialogue, by bizarrely and falsely accusing me of being a “concern troll” and “fraudulent.” Those were completely unsolicited comments on your part, directed toward a poster whose “crime” was to point out the clear and undeniable truth.
My characterization of how conspiracy theorists treat their fellow human beings, even their fellow conservatives, was spot-on - as shown by your behavior in this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.