Skip to comments.Hmm… Shock Claim: Obama Only Wants Military Leaders Who ‘Will Fire on U.S. Citizens’
Posted on 01/22/2013 3:45:43 PM PST by george76
Dr. Jim Garrow, the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Mans Quest to End Gendercide in China, made the following claim .
I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new litmus test in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.
So, who is the source?
Garrow replied: The man who told me this is one of Americas foremost military heroes.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I think we’re winning bigtime, in those and all other numbers.
If you’re lucky, you’ll just quietly bleed-out instead of getting the Red Pill.
“My theory is that the reason they are buying up all the ammo is that they havent been successful getting our guns. Hence, they will have all the ammo, and we arent able to get any...”
Yep, a billion rounds of cop killer bullets were delivered to the National Weather Service. The forecasters are coming to get us.
“Google the 29 Palms Questionnaire. This dates back to 1988 if I recall rightly. Marines stationed at the 29 Palms Marine base in California were asked this question back then. It created a firestorm of controversy. I thought at the time it was a harbinger of bad things to come. Looks like it may well be nigh.”
You’re wrong. That survey showed that 64% of Marines would not shoot Americans, The boots and privates might be susceptible to such an illegal order, but the sergeants and captains would correct them. The idiot officers who gave such a command would be fed to the alligators in the Carolina swamp.
Everyone, count the cost before committing. I’m in the South, from a long line of Confederates; great grandfather was a Confederate soldier. They hoped it would be a brief spectacle, too. Well over half a million men died in that war; and now, in spite of quitting themselves like men, us “Rebs” are regularly maligned by the likes of Obama who fancies himself the modern-day “Lincoln”. - Count the cost; because there is a cost.
Good luck finding reloading supply’s,
They are as scarce as hens teeth nowadays.
will the assault media ask questions about this at the next press conference?
we have to have ONE intreprid reporter.
Drudge would certainly get attention since he is the hompage of the MSM. Rush is show prep.
I agree, and if it is true and this person doesn't publicly come forward, shame on him.
Who here knows about reloading? Is it hard to get into?
Not hard to start, nor expensive to kit yourself out at Reloading 101 level.
Was going to suggest Lee Precision “Lee Loader Rifle or Pistol” kit, less than $40, but they’re all out of stock in the pistol category and they suggest going to a dealer.
A simple single cartridge handloader includes everything but brass, primer, powder, and bullet. It’s kind of like learning to shoot a single loader rifle. Learn the basics and get comfortable with them before dealing with turret presses and all. Some just don’t take to it. With the Lee Loader you’re not out big bucks if reloading isn’t for you. But even that $40 isn’t wasted. Handy little kit to have for a bug out bag or to have at the range to hand load different powder or bullet weights.
Old fellow in W VA swears he only loads one .30-30 cartridge a year being as how he only takes one deer a season and that’s all he needs.
Any way, take a gander here to wet your toes:
If you take to it or want more control for precision shooting you can go whole hog but that Lee Loader will still get the job done.
The fact that the government bought all those bullets, many more than they would need is a clear indication that something bad is going on.
Let me guess, his last name is "Anonymous"........that guy really gets around.......
Or were told that their retirement pay would be shut off.
It’s amazing that most of you can’t see you’re being trolled by the Left. They put out this crap with the hopes some knucklehead with a radio show repeats it as fact.
Then all they have to do is point out how irrational and crazy conservatives are.
For the love of God, THINK for once. You seriously believe think this wouldnt have been outed by those people approached and subsequently fired for saying “no?”
And you wonder why we lose elections.
That’s a bankable allegation.
There's plenty on the Internet backing this view of the Nazi party and homosexuality.
"Lively’s crime? In his book, “The Pink Swastika,” Lively exposes a secret homosexual activists don't want you to know about Nazi Germany: that although the Nazis did persecute homosexuals, the homosexuals the Nazis persecuted were almost exclusively the effeminate members of the gay community in Germany, and that much of the mistreatment was administered by masculine homosexuals who despised effeminacy in all its forms.
Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that “not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal.”
In fact, the Nazi Party began in a gay bar in Munich, and Ernst Roehm, Hitler's right hand in the early days of Nazism, was well-known for his taste in young boys. William Shirer says in his definitive “Rise and Fall of the Third Reich,” not only that Roehm was “important in the rise of Hitler,” but also “like so many of the early Nazis, (he was) a homosexual.”
Hitler eventually had Roehm shot, not because he was a homosexual but because his influence over the Brown Shirts made him a political threat to Hitler's control. The Roehm Purge, or “Night of the Long Knives,” was largely implemented by homosexuals.
Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as “Storm Troopers,” were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual. They also, sadly, comprised most of the leadership of the Hitler Youth, resulting in frequent instances of sexual molestation.
The problem with this theory is that generals do not fire on anybody. They order their subordinates to order other subordinates, etc., and eventually a squad leader orders his privates to fire on somebody.
Even if the general is personally ordering some Air Force pilot with a joystick, flying a Predator, to fire on civilians. If the pilot doesn’t want to, he doesn’t.
The basic problem here is that leftists truly believe that all military people are stupid thugs who couldn’t get any other job, and will obey *any* order given to them by anyone who “outranks” them.
So imagine Dianne Feinstein walking up to a bunch of soldiers and “ordering” them to start shooting at a Tea Party demonstration. “I’m a US senator and I *order* you to shoot those people! Obey me! Obey me!”
If even one private acts like he might, the others will intercede telling him to cut that stuff out. Not a lawful order.
Why on earth does the weather service need ammo? Maybe that’s a dumb question, but off the top of my head, I can’t think of a reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.