Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So, Only the Police Should Have Guns, Right?
PJ Tatler ^ | February 15, 2013 | Bryan Preston

Posted on 02/15/2013 12:26:17 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Ohio AG Mike DeWine is releasing evidence from an incident involving Cleveland police officers that took place in November. It started with a car chase. Then, it escalated. Badly.

CLEVELAND, Ohio — A November car chase ended in a “full blown-out” firefight, with glass and bullets flying, according to Cleveland police officers who described for investigators the chaotic scene at the end of the deadly 25-minute pursuit.

But when the smoky haze — caused by rapid fire of nearly 140 bullets in less than 30 seconds — dissipated, it soon became clear that more than a dozen officers had been firing at one another across a middle school parking lot in East Cleveland.

Both the passenger and the driver of the car were killed in the fierce firefight. Neither, it turns out, were armed.

So what happened? Well, it turns out that the 13 police officers who fired were shooting at each other. So when they thought they were under fire, they were — just from their own fellow officers.

It was all a case of mistakes piling up on top of one another.

Officers recounted for investigators seeing guns, objects that looked like guns or one of the suspects loading guns in the middle school parking lot — which could not have been possible at that point in the incident. No gun was found in the car.

Some also believed that one officer who ducked behind a car that was hit by the Malibu was either run over or shot – heightening their fears.

The report also shows that many of the officers’ worries were based on possibly erroneous information broadcast over police radio to the approximately 60 police vehicles involved in the chase...

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; lawenforcement; ohio; police; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
Comments?
1 posted on 02/15/2013 12:26:29 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Understandable mistake, considering the stress and all. Move on, nothing to see here.


2 posted on 02/15/2013 12:30:17 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One other thought. The innocents would have been guilty if they did have a gun.


3 posted on 02/15/2013 12:31:54 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I heard that one-third of the Cleveland police force was involved-on one side or the other. This is hardly the case of a bad apple panicking.


4 posted on 02/15/2013 12:33:08 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, “law enforcement officers” should not be armed. Get rid of them, the swat teams and the laws that make them more equal than the rest of us rabble. Go back to having Peace Officers that aren’t a bunch of badge heavy thugs.


5 posted on 02/15/2013 12:33:32 PM PST by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So, Only the Police Should Have Guns, Right?

if cops will be the only people allowed to carry a gun then they'll require a permit for us to carry a cop

6 posted on 02/15/2013 12:38:35 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What can you say? From what I’m hearing of these kinds of incidents, it seems pretty clear that police departments around the country need more, and more realistic training. Of course, the department leaders won’t spend the money to get them trained and prevent incidents like this.


7 posted on 02/15/2013 12:39:49 PM PST by Hardastarboard (The Liberal ruling class hates me. The feeling is mutual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In these stories, I always feel bad for the passenger, in this case a female, maybe dating the guy?

She goes out with the wrong guy, he reacts stupidly to a traffic stop, and then, just like blacks are always taught, all the police start chasing them and shooting at them.

And while the driver can be faulted because he should have stayed stopped in his vehicle and let the police to their job, so far as we can tell, the female did absolutely nothing. She was a hostage to the guy, and she was gunned down.

But the police reports will never call the passenger of a car a “hostage”. Even though it is clear from this report that she never had a chance to get out, once he decided to flee the initial stop. The car was always going at a high speed, until it stopped in the parking lot, where a police officer shot at HER. Would you jump out of a car when, without warning, a police officer just starting shooting you?

At that point, you might also feel bad for the guy. He made a lot of stupid decisions, but maybe when he got to the parking lot, he realized it was up. Maybe his girl was saying “just stop, give up, let me out.”. And then some police officer starts shooting — not at you, but at your girlfriend, who did nothing wrong. Maybe she was hit at that point, and he realized if they were going to survive, he HAD to get out.


8 posted on 02/15/2013 12:45:59 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Just to be clear, if you read the entire prosecuter’s summary, you’ll find that the female is certainly no innocent female, having multiple run-ins with the law.

None of which have any bearing on what happened on this particular evening, and none of which could have influenced the police in making decisions, because they had no idea who was in the car.

My point being that the police made a decision that the passenger was a participant in mayhem, but in this case that was a bad assumption. All because of a car backfire...


9 posted on 02/15/2013 12:50:21 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I remember an incident in Fort Wayne, Indiana, where plainclothes cops jumped out of a car and ordered the occupants out. Picture blue jeans and flannel shirt, carrying a shotgun and just "Out of the car!" One dude was so scared he started running. He was shot in the back. Late 1970's.

It was mistaken identity on the law enforcement's part. The guy was in a similar looking car.

I would guess that over the past decade, there are hundreds of incidents where an innocent is killed or wounded by the police.

10 posted on 02/15/2013 12:52:36 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Chased? Who was chased?


11 posted on 02/15/2013 12:54:29 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard; 2ndDivisionVet
From what I’m hearing of these kinds of incidents, it seems pretty clear that police departments around the country need more, and more realistic training.

How did our free American Republic get along without ANY police departments before the late 1800s?

12 posted on 02/15/2013 1:13:24 PM PST by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

13 posted on 02/15/2013 1:14:35 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Scarier yet is how quickly everyone simultaneously ran out of ammo.

Obviously if you reduce magazine sizes to 7 rounds, we won’t have to worry about 30 second firefights, we could reduce that down to 3-7 seconds - making sure no one ever gets injured.

Going back under my bridge now.

14 posted on 02/15/2013 1:27:35 PM PST by exit82b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Duh,,,


15 posted on 02/15/2013 1:31:49 PM PST by piroque ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A total monopoly on force by the police misses the underlying purpose of police.

Every adult citizen of good character *are* the law. The police are hired guns to do the anti-crime work that the public does not want to do.

This means to keep the watch 24/7, to clean up and collect evidence at crime scenes, and to doggedly pursue and formally apprehend criminals.

So saying that only the police should have guns is foolish, like saying that only carpenters should have carpentry tools, or only gardeners should have lawn and garden tools.


16 posted on 02/15/2013 1:42:52 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just like the LAPD in the Dorner episode.
Fear
Poor Training
Affirmative Action
Political Correctness
All lead to civilian collateral damage.


17 posted on 02/15/2013 1:45:25 PM PST by Tupelo (Hunkered down & loading up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

why do cops have guns?

It’s not to protect the public, it’s to protect themselves.


18 posted on 02/15/2013 1:55:00 PM PST by READINABLUESTATE ("We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

Training can’t make up for low quality people who are fearful and don’t have good judgment, yet who are armed with guns, badges and union and government protection, and sent to work daily among city folk in a complex society.


19 posted on 02/15/2013 1:58:33 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I wonder if sheriff departments tend to be as whacky and kill crazy as city police.


20 posted on 02/15/2013 2:02:19 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson