Skip to comments.Did Supreme Court clerks fail to pass on Obama Conference information to 5 Justices?
Posted on 02/24/2013 6:02:20 AM PST by IbJensen
A stunning press release by Obama eligibility challenger, Attorney Orly Taitz is revealing clerks of the Supreme Court NEVER forwarded to five out of the nine justices one single page of pleadings nor the Supplemental Brief so they could review details prior to last Fridays (Feb. 15, 2013) conference! Her case, Noonan v. Bowen, (CA Secretary of State) seeks relief in the form of a stay of election results of the Presidential election of Barack Hussein Obama because of his lack of citizenship, problematic Birth Certificate posted on the internet, plus non verifiable Social Security and Selective Service records and other data. (1)
What is especially troubling is the fact that, according to Taitz, she went in person to file the renewed application for Stays with Supreme Court Clerk Redmond Barnes and talked to Clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin as she submitted a supplemental brief concerning a national security matter. She was told to submit this material to the guard for mandatory anthrax screening. Taitz continues: THE CLERKS NEVER DOCKETED her applications! By going to her website and scrolling down, you can view the photographs of the data including the boxes and stamps contained therein.
Taitz then addressed a demand for investigation to U.S. House of Representative Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the Judiciary Committee. (2) Even as these legal developments were taking place, Taitz observed that information obfuscating what was really going on was putting out the notion that her pleading was denied.
The written order does NOT state whether the application was granted or denied, she says! (3)
Retired Air Force Colonel Richard Brewer states: I have watched with increasing alarm as those in our government particularly our judiciary at various levels have chosen to ignore the evidence and instead attack the messenger or resort to technicalities to avoid doing their job. . .I am more concerned now about the future of our country than I have ever been! He cites the famous General Douglas MacArthur quote: A million ghosts will rise up shouting DUTY HONOR COUNTRY. Brewer is calling on everyone concerned to look at every shred of evidence in the challenge to Obamas legitimacy to hold the office of the Presidency.
A vitally important part of the controversy involves Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requiring the U.S. President to be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Though not specifically defined in the Constitution, there can be no question that the Founders considered a Natural Born Citizen to be an individual born in the United States to two U.S. Citizen parents. In Obamas own book, he states his father was born in Kenya.
Taitz urges all concerned American citizens to contact the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, especially Chair Bob Goodlatte. The toll free number is 1-877-762-8762. Clearly, this issue is fast approaching critical mass. Its outcome depends in large part on the reactions of concerned United States citizens!
SOURCE: (1) (2) www.orlytaitzesq.com (3) http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf
There are a lot of constitutional issues that are not the place to start fighting. As one of many examples, the Department of Education is not authorized by the enumerated powers. As much as I would like to see that department dissolved (and I approve of public education as a State responsibility) along with half of the cabinet, fighting to eliminate that department is not the best use of our energy.
We should be fighting for real progress toward a balanced budget with lower spending in real dollars and not just cuts in the scheduled growth rate - there is a chance to win that important battle. We should be fighting for the First Amendment and battling the HHS abortion mandate in every court and for every company (private individuals and not just church-affiliated employers).
We should be fighting for the Second Amendment and peeling back those federal and state laws that infringe on our God-given and constitutionally-protected human right to defend ourselves.
There are many battles that are more urgent and more likely to lead to success than a battle to remove the affirmative action occupant of our White House - a battle that is, unfortunately, a certain loser.
I think the challenge is worse than that. I don't think that there is any evidence to show them. I don't know of anyone who will show up to testify as a witness to Obama being born anywhere other than Hawaii. Do you? I don't know of anyone who will show up to testify as a witness to his conception and thus to his paternity. Do you?
The worst thing that could happen to Orly is for someone to ask her to put on her case. I don't think there is anything. That's why so few in the public support her quixotic quest.
Perhaps federal law would apply to you? Both impersonating a member of the military and wearing the uniform of the US military with the intent to deceive are federal crimes.
The people will be able to see if a conspiracy is happening by carefully watching to see if Congress and Obama once again sign a banking contract for the USA which continues to put the USA banking system under control of international bankers especially Rothchild banking interests. The last contract was made by POTUSA Wilson in 1913 for 100 years. Think Federal Reserve-not a USA owned bank.
Here’s how it works at the USSC. All but a couple of justices are part of a pool of justices and all the petitions are distributed to the clerks for the Justices. For the most part, only one clerk for one justice reads - maybe - each petition; and then writes about a one-page summary with a recommendation to either grant or deny review. There is a great deal of pressure to simply recommend denial of review.
It is also true that the Court has greatly reduced the number of cases it accepts for a decision on the merits. Where they used to take over 200 cases a year, they are hardly ever deciding even 100 per year.
Unless you have a high-powered lawyer you are pretty much screwed no matter how badly your rights were abused in the lower courts.
Because of this, state supreme courts pretty much know they can screw you over and get away with it; especially in cases involving government corruption at the state level.
Unfortunately, I know this from personal experience.
“Imagine I go out to the PX grab me some rank and insert myself into the command of a sizable group of soldiers.”
You would have to get someone higher up to issue you written orders making you their commanding officer. And if you walked into a squadron and just announced you were the new commander, the current commander would probably have your butt tossed in jail.
“Now suppose that I issue orders to my men to forcibly shut down the invasion in AZ, lethal force and all...”
You would need deployment orders, and support for the issuing of weapons, ammo, equipment, transportation, etc. You couldn’t do it on your own initiative - no commander can.
These things don’t happen in a vacuum. Neither did Obama’s election. He ran against other candidates, was voted on by the people, won the Electoral College, had the vote certified by Congress with NO objections, was sworn in by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court...sounds like he IS the President. I believe God is going to (and currently) judge America for electing an evil baby-killer, and for approving homosexuals, etc - but God will judge Obama in His time.
Right now, Obama IS the President. And I suspect he is because God is using him to punish America by giving us what the majority want - evil.
What Orly Taitz submitted in Noonan v Bowen was not a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari but an application for a stay. Any one Justice can approve an Application for a Stay. In Noonan v Bowen both Justice Kennedy, the circuit Justice for California and Chief Justice Roberts declined to issue the requested stay. Roberts referred the application to the full Court but there were no takers.
Dr.Taitz was asking the Court to stay events that had already taken place before the Supreme Court received the application; a tough task.
If it does apply to me, then does it not also apply to Obama?
Absolutely, federal law applies to Obama. But in order to apply federal law a few items are required, like a formal law enforcement investigation, credible evidence turned over to a prosecuting attorney, a grand jury investigation, an indictment, a trial, a guilty verdict and a sentence. None of that has occurred yet. Every eligibility action directed against him has been via civil lawsuits.
What about the cold case posse and sheriff arpaio?
I was hoping that Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo would have turned over their findings to the Maricopa County Attorney before the election so that Obama would have had to run for re-election with an actual or possible criminal indictment handed down by a Grand Jury of average American citizens hanging over his head. That might have turned the election, who knows? But until a prosecutor, be they a District Attorney, a state Attorney General, a U.S. Attorney or an Independent Counsel receives the Cold Case posse’s evidence and deems it credible, it remains allegations of wrongdoing and possible criminal activity.
And everyone not in favor of using witchcraft to fight cancer is a cancer supporter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.