Skip to comments.Did Supreme Court clerks fail to pass on Obama Conference information to 5 Justices?
Posted on 02/24/2013 6:02:20 AM PST by IbJensen
A stunning press release by Obama eligibility challenger, Attorney Orly Taitz is revealing clerks of the Supreme Court NEVER forwarded to five out of the nine justices one single page of pleadings nor the Supplemental Brief so they could review details prior to last Fridays (Feb. 15, 2013) conference! Her case, Noonan v. Bowen, (CA Secretary of State) seeks relief in the form of a stay of election results of the Presidential election of Barack Hussein Obama because of his lack of citizenship, problematic Birth Certificate posted on the internet, plus non verifiable Social Security and Selective Service records and other data. (1)
What is especially troubling is the fact that, according to Taitz, she went in person to file the renewed application for Stays with Supreme Court Clerk Redmond Barnes and talked to Clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin as she submitted a supplemental brief concerning a national security matter. She was told to submit this material to the guard for mandatory anthrax screening. Taitz continues: THE CLERKS NEVER DOCKETED her applications! By going to her website and scrolling down, you can view the photographs of the data including the boxes and stamps contained therein.
Taitz then addressed a demand for investigation to U.S. House of Representative Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the Judiciary Committee. (2) Even as these legal developments were taking place, Taitz observed that information obfuscating what was really going on was putting out the notion that her pleading was denied.
The written order does NOT state whether the application was granted or denied, she says! (3)
Retired Air Force Colonel Richard Brewer states: I have watched with increasing alarm as those in our government particularly our judiciary at various levels have chosen to ignore the evidence and instead attack the messenger or resort to technicalities to avoid doing their job. . .I am more concerned now about the future of our country than I have ever been! He cites the famous General Douglas MacArthur quote: A million ghosts will rise up shouting DUTY HONOR COUNTRY. Brewer is calling on everyone concerned to look at every shred of evidence in the challenge to Obamas legitimacy to hold the office of the Presidency.
A vitally important part of the controversy involves Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requiring the U.S. President to be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Though not specifically defined in the Constitution, there can be no question that the Founders considered a Natural Born Citizen to be an individual born in the United States to two U.S. Citizen parents. In Obamas own book, he states his father was born in Kenya.
Taitz urges all concerned American citizens to contact the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, especially Chair Bob Goodlatte. The toll free number is 1-877-762-8762. Clearly, this issue is fast approaching critical mass. Its outcome depends in large part on the reactions of concerned United States citizens!
SOURCE: (1) (2) www.orlytaitzesq.com (3) http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf
These law clerks failed to follow procedure as they are Obama moles.
They should be be fired immediately and the entry of their malfeasance entered on their record. They are all aspiring lawyers who think that one day they'll be trying cases in a court of law and their ethics now seem to relegate them to the dumpster. There is no way one can doubt that deliberate Obama suppression has been going on. How many other cases have been treated the same way or is this an isolated case due to a personal agenda?
Maybe the clerks were trying to reduce government spending by not making nine copies of the pleadings (one for each justice). However, they could at least have sent a page or two of each brief to each justice (say, pages 1 -2 to the Chief Justice, pages 3-4 to Justice Thomas, etc.) Then they wouldn’t have had to make expensive copies.
I do not believe that there is any doubt that a conspiracy exists in which the Congress and the Supreme Court are involved in hiding Obama’s past.
Somehow they have decided that destroying the country is worth not having to have race riots when Obama is proven ineligible for his position.
That's when they, and most of us, realized that the artifact created through the wonder of digital pictures of former microfiche records just wasn't cutting it.
Just a few months before the retrofitted and gussied up archives facility was reopened they opened up a new landfill where they dumped the old paper stuff!
I proposed folks might like to do some dump diving to find the originals ~ anyone do that yet?
The cowardly Republicrats are the greatest disappointment. I truly believe that all in Washington know in their hearts and minds that this occupant of the now disgraced White Hut is a 100% bona fide phony created by the enemies within and without the United States to destroy this nation.
This scandalous tragedy will result in the end of America as we knew it and our founding fathers hoped for.
A pox and eternal hell for those weasels.
This isn’t just happening in the USSC it’s happening in courts all over the country.
I had a case before the Texas Supreme Court and I have no doubt that my attorney’s filings, briefs, and response never reached the judges.
Judges are turning more and more of the duties over to clerks and clerks are deciding the cases not the judges.
From the SCOTUS procedure page:
...While it is the prerogative of every Justice to read each petition for certiorari himself/herself, many participate in what is informally known as the "cert pool." As petitions for certiorari come in on a weekly basis, they are divided among the participating Justices. The participating Justices divide their petitions among their law clerks. The law clerks, in turn, read the petitions assigned to them, write a brief memorandum about the case, and make a recommendation as to whether the case should be accepted or not. The Justice provides these memoranda and recommendations to the other Justices at a Justices' Conference.
I am not in any way convinced that the druggie in our White House is a natural born citizen, but that is irrelevant at this point. We will lose that battle if we fight it. We are now in the situation of the brave soldiers defending Bataan in 1942. We will lose. We can surrender and suffer a terrible disaster, or we can fight and suffer an even more terrible disaster with no hope of victory. There are no good choices, but the least bad choice is to accept the inevitable - the usurper will continue to occupy our White House until January 20, 2016; America will suffer grave and possibly unrecoverable damage because of that communist; and the best we can hope for is to mitigate the damage now and repeal every single part of Obama's destructive legacy as soon as possible. Let's fight the battles we can win.
THESE are the ones that we need to figure out how to remove from power.
We joke about stories of T's not dotted and I's not crossed ... but just ask people that have lost farms or money or whatever because "a paper" or a "document" wasn't done correctly, in time, and I'm sorry ... just doin' m'job ... it's the law, y'know.
Birthers really ought to find someone a little more competent than Orly Taitz to be the flag-bearer for their crusade. If this woman isn’t employed by the Obama administration, she should be. She’s accomplished nothing more than turning the entire eligibility issue into something resembling a Coen Brother’s movie. One of their funny ones.
The House of Representatives has the "sole" power of impeachment. Between elections, impeachment (and the 25th Amendment) is the only legal path to the removal of a White House occupant. The Supreme Court has no power to remove presidents.
Thank you for your concern.
Instead of whining about Michelle Obama’s behind....her dance moves....even her haistyles....GOP Media and Talk Radio need to spend all their time on Barack Obama’s Eligibility
Fact is that everyone who is not raising the Obama Eligibility issue is an Obama Supporter. I am so tired of the BS “waaahhh....Michelle danced w Jimmy Fallon” and the BS excuses for not making Obama Eligibility a top issue. Stop acting like Dem Underground
The system of law in America-local, state and national-is a joke.
It is in such a state that I do as those with power do. I pick and choose what laws I wish to follow as the circumstances dictate.
They have chosen to set the standard and I choose to follow their lead.
It's the ruling class system. R or D, it's a feudal system of Lords, Knights, and Serfs.
They have been informed if they want to retain their titles/status, do not question the king or his qualifications.
You surrender over a Constitutional issue....what, pray tell, will you surrender to next?
I am sick and tired of the Obama Supporter nonsense
No one is asking for a court to remove him. All it would take to get congress moving is a court ruling that says the document posted is a forgery.
He doesn't follow Constitutional law. What makes you think he will follow that one?
I say FIGHT!!!! Make that Indonesian pig squeel!!
People don’t think it’s a big deal, until it happens to them.
The TSU has made tax fraud by the taxing authorities legal.
It is your responsibility to somehow know about the taxing authority’s intent to commit fraud and stop the fraud before you loose your property.
The article says that Orly's pleadings ask for much more than a declaration that a document is a forgery:
"Her case, Noonan v. Bowen, (CA Secretary of State) seeks relief in the form of a stay of election results of the Presidential election of Barack Hussein Obama because of his lack of citizenship, problematic Birth Certificate posted on the internet, plus non verifiable Social Security and Selective Service records and other data."
The Supreme Court is the wrong place to be trying to remove a president. The Constitution is very clear about the removal powers of the three branches. The Supreme Court has no more power than the post office in that regard.
Why should we try to depart from the Constitution on this issue? Impeachment is the remedy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.