To: Mr Rogers
The WKA decision spent half of the decision discussing natural born subject/citizen
No, it was mentioned a scant six times. Four in the decision and twice in the dissent.
What you posted is the Appellants Brief, not the determination of the court.
posted on 03/10/2013 1:04:03 PM PDT
(To follow Original Constitutional Intent, one MUST acknowledge the Right of Secession)
I KNOW I posted the Appellant’s brief. It sheds light on what the government want the court to decide.
And NBS/NBC was mentioned far more than 6 times in the WKA decision. It covered half of the decision, and for reason - because it was something the government had argued against.
posted on 03/10/2013 1:37:50 PM PDT
by Mr Rogers
(America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson