Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
The WKA decision spent half of the decision discussing natural born subject/citizen

No, it was mentioned a scant six times. Four in the decision and twice in the dissent.

What you posted is the Appellants Brief, not the determination of the court.

793 posted on 03/10/2013 1:04:03 PM PDT by MamaTexan (To follow Original Constitutional Intent, one MUST acknowledge the Right of Secession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan

I KNOW I posted the Appellant’s brief. It sheds light on what the government want the court to decide.

And NBS/NBC was mentioned far more than 6 times in the WKA decision. It covered half of the decision, and for reason - because it was something the government had argued against.


798 posted on 03/10/2013 1:37:50 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson