I KNOW I posted the Appellant’s brief. It sheds light on what the government want the court to decide.
And NBS/NBC was mentioned far more than 6 times in the WKA decision. It covered half of the decision, and for reason - because it was something the government had argued against.
posted on 03/10/2013 1:37:50 PM PDT
by Mr Rogers
(America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
To: Mr Rogers
And NBS/NBC was mentioned far more than 6 times in the WKA decision.
No, it was not. 2 referenced other cases, 1 mentioned the Act of 1790, the one I posted earlier and 2 in the dissent.
If you believe there were more....
posted on 03/10/2013 2:00:43 PM PDT
(To follow Original Constitutional Intent, one MUST acknowledge the Right of Secession)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson