Posted on 07/30/2013 9:03:55 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
I was reading this thread and ran upon the photo captioned Virginia Goeldner with her brother Stanley Dunham. I had never seen it before. The woman looked exactly like photos of his daughter from that time frame.
I googled Virginia Goeldner to see what she looked like. That video (without audio) came up. I don’t see how anyone can possibly believe that is the same woman.
Cat got your tongue?
Virginia visited the Dunhams in Hawaii in 1982. She doesn’t look the same because the video was made almost thirty years later. If you had read the article I posted the link to, you would have known that...but you weren’t interested in the background, you just wanted to chip in and make yourself look clever.
And accuse me of misidentifying the woman.
If you were simply uncertain and wanted to know who she was, you could have asked me.
A simple, polite...’are you sure that’s Virginia?’ would have been enough.
His pinhead in that photo is VERY odd. Human heads run in standard sizes, for the most part. Ordinarily, I see no indication that Zero’s head is extraordinarily small, as compared to other men, so we must at least consider the possibility that for the purposes of THAT photo, the pinhead was grafted onto someone else’s body to create the illusion of a happy family.
That was one of the questionable tales Aunt Virginia told—that the mom died in 1970. I clearly remember that original story, too, and how it disappeared and was replaced with another. One would think the woman would know when her own niece died.
I hadn’t known that Cecil died, nor that his daughter’s middle name was Cecil. Must run in the family—giving girls their father’s name.
Interesting isn't it? First of all, it shows that the Dunhams never wrote and told the Goeldners that Stanley Ann was married and had a baby...so that when the Goeldners asked who that boy was they had been looking after, Madelyn told Virginia that the boy's mother died in 1970. And then, in the same original (now removed from the web) article, (saved for posterity as an excerpt on FR) Virginia talked about Stanley Ann as the dead mother.
One might just jump to the conclusion that the woman who was his mother may have died in 1970, and she certainly wasn't the Dunham's daughter. Madelyn obviously never found it worth the trouble to 'enlighten' Virginia after 1982 that her daughter was still alive...or tell the Goeldners that Stanley Ann died in 1995.
Get's complicated, doesn't it?
Read it again. You'll find as I did, that if Stanley Ann Dunham had died in 1970, and not in 1995, the story is what Virginia believed. I can imagine the look on her face when she realized what she had done. She had compressed the life of Stanley Ann Dunham from birth to death into the period from 1942 until she 'died' in 1970...no wonder that article was quickly scrubbed and replaced, and now all there is, is this:
The requested URL /articles/2008/11/13/the_times/local_news/nws01.txt was not found on this server.
It's simply just another example that Anna Obama and Stanley Ann Dunham were two different women. In the preface to 'Dreams' the author tells us that some of the characters are composites. We should have taken notice.
A non-techie such as myself can see no other reason for the pinhead. Same thing - no other reason than photoshop for the gigantic head on the man standing next to the “girlfriend” Genevieve.
I wonder why they do such crummy ‘shop jobs with their propaganda photos. They don’t have time? Good help? They’re just sticking it to us so they trot out junk and laugh when people don’t protest?
It’s simply just another example that Anna Obama and Stanley Ann Dunham were two different women. In the preface to ‘Dreams’ the author tells us that some of the characters are composites. We should have taken notice.
Ain’t that the truth!
The door to the photoshop question is better left open, it’s been shown that the jacket he was wearing in that ‘Genevieve’ photograph was the same jacket he was shown in, sitting on the wall in Central Park, it’s also the same jacket he wore in Kenya, which possibly identifies the year of his first visit to 1983, not 1986 as we are expected to believe, and furthermore, the watch he is wearing in the ‘Genenvieve’ photo, is the same watch he’s shown wearing at a student gathering while he was supposedly at Occidental.
One is inclined to believe that might have been his body wearing the jacket and the watch...or they used the same headless body and just stuck his face on top of it, LOL. (One desperately needs a sense of humour.)
You’re in a class of your own:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010617175653/http://home.att.net/~c.goeldner/work.html
Major Assignments:
Have installed and tested all Systematics software products at dozens of domestic client locations as well as many major international institutions in England, large banks in Puerto Rico, the National Bank of Greece
and Riyadh Bank of Saudi Arabia.
What makes the entire story about the mother dying in 1970 so interesting is the fact that, rather than just correcting the original article, with an explanation for how the mistake happened, they changed the story and then disappeared the first version—off the Web as well as off the Internet Archive, where it still resided up until about a year ago. Then it disappeared from the archive, too.
If it were just a simple matter of a small-town reporter being confused or “mishearing” what the woman said, then a correction would have explained that fact. But instead, the story simply mysteriously changed, and the other was scrubbed. One can envision the powers that be coming down on the head of that Maumelle reporter.
interestin news today bout Valerie Jarrett huh
What was fascinating was that the original article and it's replacement, which originally bore a statement to the effect 'this is the first interview Virginia Goeldner has ever given' were time stamped and dated only HOURS apart! The wrath must have decended instantaneously! But it was hilarious that BOTH articles remained up for quite a while. Wish I had saved both on my harddrive, but I didn't...more's the pity.
In 1982, Madelyn wasn't telling anyone Stanley Ann Dunham had been married to a brilliant economist from Kenya and had a baby...and neither did she tell her co-workers at the bank, because there was an article in which one of them said they had no idea she was a grandmother until they saw the boy when he was going to school at Panahou.
She didn't become a 'grandmother' until she and Stanley Armour became his guardians - and in 1973, Stanley Ann Dunham - Soetoro and Lolo Soetoro filed a joint Tax Return on which they only claimed Maya as a dependant child. So with his 'mother and stepfather' living in Hawaii, zero wasn't living with 'his parents' - because 'she' wasn't his mother and no longer claimed to be, evidently.
Jarrett’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, was an associate of Frank Marshall Davis, the controversial labor movement activist who has been identified as an early influence on Obama.
Vernon Jarrett and Davis worked together in 1940 in a Communist Party-dominated organization, the Citizen’s Committee to Aid Packing House Workers. The group’s own correspondence, previously uncovered by the New Zeal blog, describes its communist influence. Many of its leaders were tied to the Communist Party.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/valerie-jarrett-planted-by-communist-sympathizer/
WND EXCLUSIVE
New York Times profile scrubs Valerie Jarrett’s radical ties
Family closely linked to Bill Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis
Published: 07/06/2013 at 5:02 PM
http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/new-york-times-profile-scrubs-valerie-jarretts-radical-ties/
AG - I couldn’t get onto FR from yesterday evening until mid day today - could you direct me to the news about Jarrett?
Also, were the Legos room comments you made about other vile illicit acts by 0mozlem?
Sheesh, I just looked up two comments and saw FN’s comments.
Unless there is OTHER news.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3051375/posts?page=45#45
the lego comment was to support the actual knowledge Obarry enjoys
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.