Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List (notification of new articles).
FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Sultan Knish ping list.
I strongly suggest you visit the Knish blog. It is a fountain of valuable links, articles and more.
Posted on 07/31/2013 12:44:17 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell
FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Sultan Knish ping list.
I strongly suggest you visit the Knish blog. It is a fountain of valuable links, articles and more.
There are no good Muslims, only enemies who seek our destruction. We have brought them into our seat of national power. We will clean house or it will get burned to the ground.
Pentagon may dump evangelist for insulting Islam
The Army is considering whether to rescind an invitation to evangelist Franklin Graham to appear at the Pentagon amid complaints about his description of Islam as evil, a military spokesman said Wednesday.
Graham, the son of famed evangelist Billy Graham, was to appear at the Pentagon on May 6 on what is the National Day of Prayer. He said he will be a guest of the Pentagon and will speak only if he’s still invited.
Army Col. Tom Collins said withdrawing the invitation “is on the table,” but no decision has been made. He said Army brass will have the ultimate decision on whether to pull the invite.
From 2010
http://olbroad.com/2010/04/page/5/
“and shut the door to Jewish refugees trying to [get to?] Israel”
I really wish Greenfield would get an editor, or at least a proofreader. His commentary is so spot on, but is habitually marred by oversights like this.
I'm afraid Dan goes off the rails here.
Had you asked Hitler or the other architects of the Holocaust why they were doing it, I seriously doubt Islam would have come up.
Blaming Britain for the Holocaust because they kept Jews from emigrating to Palestine also doesn't hold much water. The actual death toll in the Holocaust was not enormous until well into the war, when the Nazis decided that expulsion of the Jews wasn't possible in wartime, so they'd just have to kill them instead. It's difficult to see how British control of Palestine had anything to do with that decision.
Had the British allowed unrestricted Jewish immigration into Palestine in the 30s, which would BTW have been a violation of various pledges to the Arabs, it's difficult to see how more than some hundreds of thousands, perhaps a million, could possibly have been accomodated, for logistical reasons.
Which would have helped, but would certainly not have been a sufficient refuge for the many millions affected by the Final Solution.
Well, no.
Eisenhower did not support the seizure of Suez by the Egyptians, he opposed the Anglo/French/Israeli invasion of Egypt in response.
The Pentagon fawns before those that bombed it.
That makes it useless for its original function
which was (long ago) the protection of the American people.
Liberals, atheists, and agnostics have, for years, perpetuated the canard that “Religion has caused more wars than any other factor.” In a sense they are correct, only the “religion” they should be referring to is ISLAM.
I had been long aware of this, and had managed to link islam to every war since the “Crusades”. My link to WW1, however, was a bit tenuous, having only had the activities of Lawrence of Arabia vs. the Turks as an example.
Dan has helped me by filling in the gaps in my knowledge of the period.
This man is AMAZING!
The liberation of Jerusalem by General Allenby (which in Arabic means “Prophet of God) is one of the most ironic coincidences in history.
Or IS it a coincidence?
What is the effective difference?
“.........By competing for their favor, we are only bidding against ourselves, and paying out to our enemies.”
They have won at least the Jizyah.
Yet, in the flow of history, the difference is largely attitudinal and leaves the course of history unchanged.
And yet, here in America, liberals & atheists are among the strongest allies for Muslims. In the public schools, for example, they clamor for muzzies to have their own dedicated prayer room but would scream bloody murder if Jews or Christians were given the same accomodation.
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend”
Warring against nations has been the primary function of Islam since it inception by a Mohammed the mad warlord. The only peace with Islam comes at the point of subjegation. The thesis posed by FReeper, leftthatothersite, places Islam squarely in the center of every major hostility since Mohammed’s rampage. If not all certainly most.
Hitler bonded with the Grand Mufti over their mutual commitment to the extermination of the Jews. Hitler and Germany answered for that crime. Islam has never and persists in the extermination of Jewry today.
Watch this remarkable YouTube about the relationship of Hitler and the Grand Mufti.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_p4B0vN488
This would be a good thread to link this site:
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/
which well-covers the Hitler / Mufti relationship.
Yes.
And I notice from your screen name that you KNOW whereof I speak when I posit the historical reason for nearly ALL the global wars since the 7th century. ]:-(
The DoD has to do what it’s told, D. Shaping national policy is civilian. Policy now is to go all in on Islam.
McChrystal didn’t, though. Neither did Ham or Gaouette.
Obama has replaced nuclear sub commanders with his people—slowly and quietly—who will NOT fire. Ditto for ship and jet leaders/admirals/generals. Our military branch leadership has been relieved, one by one.
The SEALS won’t cooperate, so they’re being butchered. Big mistake on 0bama/Holder/Jarrett’s part there. Huge.
In public schools, one week at least is taught on Islam, including the saying of prayers. Materials are copied on copiers.
And that instruction will absolutely NOT include”
“If you’re what Muslims regard as an `infidel’, then they hate you and they want you dead”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.