Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News Raises the Rainbow Flag
Catholic Lane ^ | 9/13/2013

Posted on 09/15/2013 10:22:23 AM PDT by Altura Ct.

“Fox News joins the Pro-Homosexual Media Bandwagon” – so says Peter LaBarbera in a 40,000-word expose that flaunts over 220 footnotes. (Read the full report here: Unfair, Unbalanced and Afraid).

While Sean Hannity chooses silence and John Stossel passive acceptance, rising star Megyn Kelly plays trans-gender advocate for Chaz Bono, then drops the “hate card” on the psychiatrist who disagrees.

Bernie Goldberg pushes “Jesus is just alright with” gay, then implies that the Biblical heroes David and Jonathan were homosexual as were Ruth and Naomi. Sean Hannity? – Still mum.

Bill O’Reilly bashes an ex-gay; Elizabeth Hasselbeck calls pope’s opposition to “gay marriage” – “inhumane.” Stossel? – Still indifferent.

Shep Smith graces the annual report of “Out” magazine’s 50 Most Powerful Homosexuals (he does have dreamy eyes), Fox News Channel fronts tens of thousands of dollars for a Gay and Lesbian Journalists group, and Chris Wallace probes Ron Paul’s homophobia. Stossel? He’s down with gay and thinks polygamy is just groovy.

Five out of five of “The Five” agree with the “evolved” Obama on same-sex marriage; Fox hires “out” lesbian, liberal Sally Kohn – and I think Hannity just blinked.

Do your eyes deceive you? This must be about MSNBC; Fox News is the conservative network, right?

The part that really kicked me in the pants was the Pew Research Study that confirmed that Fox News had a pro “gay marriage” bias and that even liberal NPR was more “Fair and Balanced” on the issue than was Fox.

“Conservatives of all stripes had high hopes for Fox News to offset the overwhelming liberal bias of the dominant “mainstream” media networks,” writes LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH; www.aftah.org), a Chicago-based organization dedicated to exposing and opposing the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) activist movement.

If LaBarbera is anything, he is fair as he is thorough! His report asks some critical questions:

– Is Sean Hannity afraid of the “gay issue”?

– Is Shepard Smith the next Anderson Cooper?

– Is Megyn Kelly the new hero to the gay lobby?

– Will Glenn Beck join the new gay crusade?

– Where is John Stossel, the champion of liberty, on the biggest threat to religious liberty in American history?

– Why is Fox News subsidizing a “gay” journalists association?

– Why does Fox humanize one side of the debate while marginalizing and demonizing the other?

– Why is Fox so averse to having a “fair and balanced” debate, with a real “pro-family” conservative as a counterpoint?

“But Fox, mimicking current trends in the Republican Party with which it is often identified,” LaBarbera continues, “– has increasingly adopted a libertarian brand of ‘conservatism’ that eschews or downplays social issues, especially homosexuality, as too ‘divisive.’ Thus Fox News’ coverage – including conservative advocacy programs like the ‘Sean Hannity Show’– has in recent years tended to downplay homosexual-related issues,” added LaBarbera. “(This is at odds with Ronald Reagan, who advocated social conservatism as one of the three legs of the conservative stool – the others being fiscal responsibility and a strong defense and foreign policy.)”

When a “news” organization decides what stories they will share and which to shelve, they are committing censorship by omission. In contrast to MSNBC’S more overt “in the bag” gayhem, the majority of Fox hosts just pretend the issue doesn’t exist.

Even in the broil of the same-sex “marriage” debate, Hannity rarely raised the issue and when it did come up, he looked like he was auditioning for the role of Chief Inspector Dreyfus in a Pink Panther remake: *Eye-twitch – “Let not your hearts be troubled,” followed by a butt shift and an uncomfortable segue to safer subjects, like treason or Benghazi, then throw the Nerf football to Camera #2. “It’s a wrap!”

“As if becoming neutral (or shallow) on crucial Culture War issues wasn’t disappointing enough,” writes LaBarbera, “some leading Fox News’ hosts, such as Bill O’Reilly, Shepard Smith and Megyn Kelly, have emerged as on-air, pro-LGBT advocates – seemingly defying Fox’s core audience demographic of staunch Republican conservatives.”

Not only does Fox shy from the controversy, when the issue does come up, they stack the deck with a bevy of gay-pologists: Greg Gutfeld, Sally Kohn, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Liz Wiehl, for a time Margaret Hoover and Wayne Besen. All of these are pro gay with some even going as far as to castigate those with whom they disagree as hate-filled bigots.

When was the last time that you saw Peter LaBarbera or Matt Barber as a guest on the “fair and balanced” network? Even Tony Perkins is rarely invited since the whole flap with Megyn Kelly that produced the infamous remark from Ron Burgundy (Bill O’Reilly) about “bible thumpers.”

In fairness, the special report from America’s Survival does chronicle when Fox has been fair on the issue and gives credit to personalities like Gretchen Carlson, Todd Starnes and Mike Huckabee, who stand for traditional values, but how often are these exceptions ever on the air? How often are they on the air and speaking about this subject?

It seems that the Fox hierarchy has stowed the defenders of sexual purity in the closet while tossing the keys to sexual anarchy’s vanguard.

When was the last time that Fox News had an ex-gay on? Actually that may have been back in 2002 when Bill O’Reilly attacked Stephen Bennet for challenging his understanding of the Catholic position on homosexuality. Bennett, who overcame his “gay” lifestyle of 11 years (including over 100 homosexual partners), embraced Christianity, married his girlfriend Irene and became the father of two children, was called an “idiot” by O’Reilly on the radio show lead-up to the television interview (where O’Reilly toned it down to “religious fanatic”).

I’m pretty confident that anyone who actually believes that the Bible is God’s word would be considered a “religious fanatic,” coming from a guy who will shortly set us all straight about the real reason that Jesus was killed – “taxes!”

From Megyn Kelly’s rabid defense of all things lavender to Shep Smith’s comment on “Chick-fil-a” day being a “national day of intolerance”, Fox News seems to have taxied out on the good ship lollipop.


TOPICS: Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: fauxnews; foxnews; homosexualagenda; labarbera; lavendermafia; liberalmedia; pinkjournalism; trashtv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2013 10:22:23 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Oh geeez....


2 posted on 09/15/2013 10:26:38 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Yet, so many Freepers think that watching Fox News is supporting their cause.


3 posted on 09/15/2013 10:30:10 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

They are all elitists. Of course they are for all things gay. SOP. They are also in “show business” and yes, TV news nowadays is show business.


4 posted on 09/15/2013 10:31:59 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

All our televisions come equipped with an on/off button. They are off most of the time, and when they’re on, we’re certainly not listening to some supposed “news” broadcast.

If enough people would quit watching, maybe we could get an honest news channel in this country.


5 posted on 09/15/2013 10:36:13 AM PDT by basil (2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
All our televisions come equipped with an on/off button.

They also come with a "Brightness" knob, but it never seems to work.

6 posted on 09/15/2013 10:39:03 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

Haven’t watched the news in a year. I can pick and choose what to read


7 posted on 09/15/2013 10:40:34 AM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
America the Beautiful


8 posted on 09/15/2013 10:44:06 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

If I do watch any news programs anymore (which ain’t too damn often) I guess faux news is the least offensive. So........


9 posted on 09/15/2013 10:44:13 AM PDT by rktman (Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: basil

True and mine now stays off permanently. I saw FOX going left some time ago and chose to turn them off as well. Once their ratings start to tank like the other stations, maybe they will wake up - or not.


10 posted on 09/15/2013 10:46:21 AM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

I’m just waiting for “Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.” to start.


11 posted on 09/15/2013 10:52:56 AM PDT by cld51860 (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

I do not watch any news on tv unless it is local storm coverage. I get mine online and FR and Facebook are the better sites.


12 posted on 09/15/2013 10:54:28 AM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

Yeah, I never could understand that either.


13 posted on 09/15/2013 10:54:43 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr (It will take blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Will Glenn Beck join the new gay crusade?

Yes he has. He totally favors the homo-fascist agenda

14 posted on 09/15/2013 10:57:22 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

I haven’t watched Fox News in years


15 posted on 09/15/2013 10:57:40 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: basil

Yes, yes, and YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TURN THEM OFF...........the message will resound!!


16 posted on 09/15/2013 10:57:52 AM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: basil
If enough people would quit watching, maybe we could get an honest news channel in this country.

Not likely. Cable and satellite TV services love channels nobody watches and reject any channel that might be conservative (or even just non-liberal)

17 posted on 09/15/2013 10:58:52 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL!


18 posted on 09/15/2013 11:00:31 AM PDT by basil (2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

ising star Megyn Kelly plays trans-gender advocate for Chaz Bono, then drops the “hate card” on the psychiatrist who disagrees.

/////////////////////
Very sad — and discouraging. I do not care for her anymore.

Some people have convictions — others have their (wet) fingers in the wind.

Ms Kelly is now apparently the “it” host on Fox.

Further, I cannot adequately express my personal contempt for Roger Ailes — someone who used to be involved with Limbaugh, but now is turning Fox hard to portside.


19 posted on 09/15/2013 11:06:16 AM PDT by man_in_tx (Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

To: Altura Ct.

The Emperor STILL has no clothes, and now, they lynch the frank little boy who guilessly says so.


21 posted on 09/15/2013 11:13:44 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Gee, what a surprise...


22 posted on 09/15/2013 11:16:54 AM PDT by carriage_hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

I always thought he looked exactly like Jimminy Cricket.


23 posted on 09/15/2013 11:19:52 AM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chandlerlansing

geez dude, no one wans to hear about your boob preferences here


24 posted on 09/15/2013 11:24:47 AM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Heh heh! The brightness knob varies the light level on the screen but never on what’s being transmitted to us!

Well, this is a warning. If anyone actually idolized Fox this is a good warning to stop that.

At the same time, any resource that can be used should still be used as best it can be. I am a caveman Christian who actually believes God means it when He promises every resource needed to exalt His name. We shouldn’t drop resources on the floor because they have bad problems.

We can’t coast on ANY worldly resource. It will fail and disappoint us. The lessons we are getting today are very helpful! We CAN depend on God but to get the power and the blessing we have to act like, hey, we actually BELIEVE that. Pray and speak as to a fond, loving Father (which is what “Abba” means... it’s the rough Aramaic equivalent of Daddy!).


25 posted on 09/15/2013 11:30:34 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

We can’t coast => But, we can’t coast


26 posted on 09/15/2013 11:32:19 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
There is a familial resemblance...


27 posted on 09/15/2013 11:44:41 AM PDT by carriage_hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Lookit, chil’ren, there isn’t going to be a rollback on gay rights, period. Get used to the integration of the poofter demographic into our daily affairs and try to make the cognitive leap to where we can communicate with them to the degree that we can influence them away from the more egregious expressions of their sexual orientation-i.e. pederasty, sado-masochism and blatant recruitment.

This is a tough one to swallow, to be sure, but that’s the way the cookie is crumbling in a technological society with more freedom than humans have ever experienced on the planet before. Pray that it’s a phase, a reaction to the heavy handed suppression of homosexuality historically, not to mention a the undeniable quantity of “vigiliante” gay bashing that was carried out in the US, most likely not by men who voted Democrat, and that, with integration and a lessening of threat to gays, it will subside from being a live issue.

There is a surprisingly large number of gay conservatives out there. Why not at least try to increase their numbers via diplomatic means?


28 posted on 09/15/2013 11:58:02 AM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.; mickie; flaglady47; pax_et_bonum; Maine Mariner; Bob Ireland; seekthetruth; seenenuf; ..
To each his own. But it doesn't help in the battle for mens' minds one iota to cancel your cable service or to eschew watching Fox News.

Unless you have a Nielsen or other rating device for your TV during a prescribed survey period, neither the network or its advertisers have the slightest clue you're boycotting them. So, you become ineffective in the battle.

I watch the network's evening lineup faithfully so I can report on them. Know thy enemy. Fox has the widest cable news audience in the nation. If EVERYONE gave up watching and commenting on the network's commendable reporting, its selective-reporting, its under-reporting or its slanted reporting, we'd really be in trouble.

For instance, how many folks know that Fox's largest shareholder (second only to the Murdoch family in holdings) is an Arabian Muzzie prince. Probably very few out of the millions of viewers. This fact (which the public has a right to know) has to come from somewhere, and periodically I and other freepers and other outlets post it on the internet because you won't see it on your nightly news programs.

Fox would undoubtedly be more liberal than it is now if it weren't for watchdogs who keep tabs on the powerful and shifty behind-the-scenes nabobs who control the content and slant of Fox news production.......and who hire and richly compensate the increasing group of Fox News marxist, socialist and "social justice" anchors, pundits, commentators, analysts, "contributors' and "experts" appearing relentlessly in your frontroom.

"Semper Paratus" (always prepared) isn't a motto just for the Coast Guard. WE ARE THE FRONTLINE, lookin' out for the folks, as statist/populist Bill O'Bloviator likes to say (but fails to do).

Leni

29 posted on 09/15/2013 11:58:48 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

They get a fee per cable subscriber. Watch, dont watch, they get paid.

Wanna stop paying them? Then stop paying them. Cut the cable tv.


30 posted on 09/15/2013 12:02:21 PM PDT by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Then cut the cable. I did, and I feel cleaner.

Just like life is carbon-based, entertainment including "news" is fag-based.
31 posted on 09/15/2013 12:07:24 PM PDT by 867V309 (Stupidity is ordained; Ignorance is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; cyn; 444Flyer; Yehuda; Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America; hal ogen
While Sean Hannity chooses silence and John Stossel passive acceptance, rising star Megyn Kelly plays trans-gender advocate for Chaz Bono, then drops the “hate card” on the psychiatrist who disagrees.

The "hate card" is the most insidious card of all. All the victimhoods of any of the other cards can be played with a hate card. It's like having the master key access to all pretexts for persecution.

Beastgov's and modern culture's definitions of bigots, racists, homophobes, misogynists, islamophobes, xenophobes et al are already being distilled down to one simple word: haters.

The final battle against those who won't give up reason and truth will be called the "War on Hate".

Beware of those who mindlessly (or not so mindlessly) exclaim, "Don't be a Hater."

32 posted on 09/15/2013 12:20:04 PM PDT by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

You would think that some wealthy Conservatives would create a cable news show that actually supports Conservative values. Why they don’t understand this is beyond me.


33 posted on 09/15/2013 12:33:04 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel
.
34 posted on 09/15/2013 12:34:06 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

there are no words. i’m not watching faux news anyway, but the masquerade needs to be shown up (as it is here).


35 posted on 09/15/2013 12:35:32 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

ROFL!! love it :o)


36 posted on 09/15/2013 12:38:14 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Is Shepard Smith the next Anderson Cooper?

If he goes to Egypt, he will be...

37 posted on 09/15/2013 12:40:53 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

I haven’t watched in years, I ain’t paying for cable


38 posted on 09/15/2013 12:43:31 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

O’Really ......


39 posted on 09/15/2013 1:25:30 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cyn; mickie; flaglady47
"I'm not watching faux news anyway, but the masquerade needs to be shown up (as it is here)".

See # 29.

You can't "show anything up" if you're not participating. In the words of the immortal "anonymous", "If not you, WHO?

Not being eternally vigilant and involved and not even participating to the slightest extent in the ongoing, anti-propaganda battle against the marxist media is merely punting the ball to someone else who has to labor harder on the front lines to pick up any slack.

We all have to do little jobs that we find onerous or off-putting if we are to prevail in saving our Republic.

Leni

40 posted on 09/15/2013 1:34:07 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.; GeronL; MinuteGal; MamaB; carriage_hill; Ezekiel

41 posted on 09/15/2013 1:36:20 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

LOL!


42 posted on 09/15/2013 1:51:21 PM PDT by carriage_hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

SPARKLY!!!


43 posted on 09/15/2013 1:52:12 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

44 posted on 09/15/2013 1:56:27 PM PDT by carriage_hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui
Lookit, chil’ren, there isn’t going to be a rollback on gay rights, period.

There most assuredly will be a roll back of the homosexual movement. Already in many parts of Europe homosexuals are afraid to display themselves as homosexuals in public. The Muslim immigrants who have become so prevalent there tend to take a dim view of such theatrics. Now that Muslims are established there, it won't be long until they have a plurality. The future belongs exclusively to those who have children and the Muslims do that particularly well. Given enough time the demographics will also change here in a similar way but perhaps with a different form of religious zealotry.

Get used to the integration of the poofter demographic into our daily affairs and try to make the cognitive leap to where we can communicate with them to the degree that we can influence them away from the more egregious expressions of their sexual orientation-i.e. pederasty, sado-masochism and blatant recruitment.

They cannot abandon their core ideals and it is folly to think that there is anything we could compromise enough to get them to do so.

This is a tough one to swallow, to be sure, but that’s the way the cookie is crumbling in a technological society with more freedom than humans have ever experienced on the planet before.

The sad pun in your mixed metaphor aside, authentic freedom is not at issue here for them. The homosexual movement is attacking real religious freedom by attempting to destroy the family.

Pray that it’s a phase, a reaction to the heavy handed suppression of homosexuality historically, not to mention a the undeniable quantity of “vigiliante” gay bashing that was carried out in the US, most likely not by men who voted Democrat, and that, with integration and a lessening of threat to gays, it will subside from being a live issue.

This isn't a backlash, it's a highly coordinated subversive movement that has long been aligned with the Communist Party and the Democrat Party.

There is a surprisingly large number of gay conservatives out there. Why not at least try to increase their numbers via diplomatic means?

Even the Democrats know that attempting to win the votes of active homosexuals is a fool's errand for Republicans. All that will be gained by compromising the conservative position is the loss of the Republican base. The homosexuals are no more likely to vote against the homosexual party as black people are likely to vote against a black president.

45 posted on 09/15/2013 2:30:01 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
 photo GAYCAT_zps6bc7ed2c.png
46 posted on 09/15/2013 3:25:07 PM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baddog 219

Why did conservatives get into bed with Rupert Murdoch in the first place? He is a longtime purveyor of tabloid trash. He never had any morals. Why should anyone be surprised that the Glee network is totally gay?


47 posted on 09/15/2013 3:52:28 PM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

>>Lookit, chil’ren, there isn’t going to be a rollback on gay rights, period.

>There most assuredly will be a roll back of the homosexual movement. Already in many parts of Europe homosexuals are afraid to display themselves as homosexuals in public. The Muslim immigrants who have become so prevalent there tend to take a dim view of such theatrics. Now that Muslims are established there, it won’t be long until they have a plurality. The future belongs exclusively to those who have children and the Muslims do that particularly well. Given enough time the demographics will also change here in a similar way but perhaps with a different form of religious zealotry.

I don’t see your observation of a roll back due to Muslim intervention or any other “zealotry”. What you describe is a marginal phenomenon except perhaps lately in Russia. The so called “gay liberation” movement is emphatically NOT losing momentum in North America or Europe but continue to make inroads into mass media and education. As an FR reader you should know this from the many articles and threads on the subject, this one being not exceptional.

>>Get used to the integration of the poofter demographic into our daily affairs and try to make the cognitive leap to where we can communicate with them to the degree that we can influence them away from the more egregious expressions of their sexual orientation-i.e. pederasty, sado-masochism and blatant recruitment.

>They cannot abandon their core ideals and it is folly to think that there is anything we could compromise enough to get them to do so.

No one has to compromise anything. Homosexuality is not a core ideal, it is an engineered ideal created by sexual abuse and other childhood psychological cause factors, including very early ones. We can certainly start by understanding what those causes are and create a society with better parenting skills.

>>This is a tough one to swallow, to be sure, but that’s the way the cookie is crumbling in a technological society with more freedom than humans have ever experienced on the planet before.

>The sad pun in your mixed metaphor aside, authentic freedom is not at issue here for them. The homosexual movement is attacking real religious freedom by attempting to destroy the family.

The “sad pun” was unintended. I don’t spend a lot of time trying to make my posts into literary masterpieces. Clear your head and understand that modern technological society with massive lateral communication is the freest humans have ever been in all history, period. This freedom is what societies are coping with in an attempt to reset positive social behavior against a background of varying social conservatisms by definition. That what “society” is, a means of conserving positive normative behavior patterns, which have evolved through intense periods of zealotry and oppression. The root cause of Muslim intraction is precisely the effect of modernization upon a feudal tribalist cultural ethos.

>>Pray that it’s a phase, a reaction to the heavy handed suppression of homosexuality historically, not to mention a the undeniable quantity of “vigiliante” gay bashing that was carried out in the US, most likely not by men who voted Democrat, and that, with integration and a lessening of threat to gays, it will subside from being a live issue.

>>This isn’t a backlash, it’s a highly coordinated subversive movement that has long been aligned with the Communist Party and the Democrat Party.

Yes, but not to the degree you assume. And you’ll have to convince me that these commies are not the ones responsible for the sexual conservatism found presently in Russia, China and North Korea. The corrupting of ethics and morals in the West, which you correctly observe, is not the sole domain of Marxist influence. You will find it in Las Vegas, Wall St., New Orleans, Spring Break anywhere, porn markets anywhere with much of it an outgrowth of advertising. In case you haven’t noticed, “sex sells”.

>>There is a surprisingly large number of gay conservatives out there. Why not at least try to increase their numbers via diplomatic means?

>Even the Democrats know that attempting to win the votes of active homosexuals is a fool’s errand for Republicans. All that will be gained by compromising the conservative position is the loss of the Republican base. The homosexuals are no more likely to vote against the homosexual party as black people are likely to vote against a black president.

The “Republican base” is a chimera manipulated by Wall St. and oligarch power brokers to rubber stamp their invisible hand strategies. It’s entertaining to me to see Freepers coming into line with lefty observations about police brutality, Wall St. chicanery, intel community shennanigans, America as global policeman, big pharma, the benefits of natural foods/alternative medicine and the pathology of bullying.

Your Republican base is on the verge of a Tea Part vs. Rino schism that could torpedo the US doing what Australia and Norway just did. We need to get smarter faster, that’s all there is to it.


48 posted on 09/15/2013 4:46:18 PM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui
I don’t see your observation of a roll back due to Muslim intervention or any other “zealotry”. What you describe is a marginal phenomenon except perhaps lately in Russia.

Not at all. The Muslims are also attacking homosexuals and others throughout western Europe who offend their religious views. Entire neighborhoods in almost every major city are now considered off-limits to anyone considered non-traditional.

The so called “gay liberation” movement is emphatically NOT losing momentum in North America or Europe but continue to make inroads into mass media and education. As an FR reader you should know this from the many articles and threads on the subject, this one being not exceptional.

They have made some political headway, but the long-term demographics are completely against them.

The “sad pun” was unintended. I don’t spend a lot of time trying to make my posts into literary masterpieces.

This topic warrants care in the choice of one's words. Much of your writing here is very difficult to follow.

Clear your head and understand that modern technological society with massive lateral communication is the freest humans have ever been in all history, period. This freedom is what societies are coping with in an attempt to reset positive social behavior against a background of varying social conservatisms by definition.

Any human advance cuts both ways. The sweeping technological changes you speak of are irrelevant in the long-term to people who do not have children beyond replacement rate. Muslims don't teach "Timmy has Two Mommies" in the madrassas.

That what “society” is, a means of conserving positive normative behavior patterns, which have evolved through intense periods of zealotry and oppression.

You have a novel definition of society.

The root cause of Muslim intraction is precisely the effect of modernization upon a feudal tribalist cultural ethos.

That sounds like something taught in a large liberal-arts colleges.

Yes, but not to the degree you assume. And you’ll have to convince me that these commies are not the ones responsible for the sexual conservatism found presently in Russia, China and North Korea.

In my travels I haven't seen any of the conservatism you refer to.

The corrupting of ethics and morals in the West, which you correctly observe, is not the sole domain of Marxist influence. You will find it in Las Vegas, Wall St., New Orleans, Spring Break anywhere, porn markets anywhere with much of it an outgrowth of advertising. In case you haven’t noticed, “sex sells”.

That advertising maxim may or may not be true. The question here is the type and orientation. Homosexuality tends to be generally unpopular as most people recoil from it.

The “Republican base” is a chimera manipulated by Wall St. and oligarch power brokers to rubber stamp their invisible hand strategies. It’s entertaining to me to see Freepers coming into line with lefty observations about police brutality, Wall St. chicanery, intel community shennanigans, America as global policeman, big pharma, the benefits of natural foods/alternative medicine and the pathology of bullying.

Not following you there, but the Republican base was and remains socially conservative.

Your Republican base is on the verge of a Tea Part vs. Rino schism that could torpedo the US doing what Australia and Norway just did. We need to get smarter faster, that’s all there is to it.

I have no idea what you are talking about here. You and I seem to have some beliefs in common, but I do not share your pessimism and eagerness to appease, surrender, and attempt to assimilate the homosexual movement. Although the pendulum may have swung in their favor in recent decades, all future indicators are against them. Demographics is destiny, and the homosexual movement has no heirs.

It has been very difficult to understand your typing and the nature of the argument you are attempting to make. Proof reading your posts is a common courtesy. So, I'll leave it here and give you the last word.

49 posted on 09/15/2013 5:32:34 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

And no mention of how much they *hate* God’s rules over His creation...planet earth. They ignore the owner’s manual to their own peril.


50 posted on 09/15/2013 6:48:48 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD? Habakkuk 2;Isaiah 55)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson