Skip to comments.Obama: We are remaking the courts
Posted on 11/09/2013 8:11:18 AM PST by KentuckyTim
Speaking at a Democratic fundraiser, held at a private residence in Dallas, Texas, President Obama stated, we are remaking the courts.
The Presidents statement is especially important, due to the fact that critics of the President have long accused him of attempting to change the American court system, in order to ensure his leftist agenda is deemed to be constitutional. The President, however, has denied doing this, until now...
Continue reading at BeltwayExaminer.com
(Excerpt) Read more at beltwayexaminer.com ...
Stop excerpting your blog.
“Fundamentally transforming America” into the Soviet Union.
Excerpting their own blog is not illegal nor against the rules therefore it would be better to add a “Please would you consider NOT excerpting your own blog” in your request.
when courts start deciding based on who you are as opposed to what the law is , it’s over
Wow, every day the nightmare just grows and grows.
the first step to transforming something is to destroy it. They’re doing that pretty well. But they have proven themselves incapable of creating anything, including a functioning web page.
Interesting that these 0 comments were taken from a fundraiser at a private Dallas residence. Who was the mole?
And who was the host/hostess? Trial lawyer(s) or “Green crony capitalist”?
I don’t graciously ask someone permission to stop stealing or taking advantage of me
How long before they take advantage of the fact there is no citizenship requirement for Supreme Court Justices?
By my count, and I urge verification, we’ve had six already. Majority from British Isles including three from Jay’s courts which could be understandable if your understanding is there was a dearth of talent in the early days.
Or it could have been by design. After all James Wilson, a Scottish native, was one of the three members of the Committee of Design left with the task of putting all the genius of the Constitutional Convention down on paper.
Maybe Arlen Spectre’s reliance on Scottish law was cutting edge conditioning.
The master plan unfolding.
It is law schools that are remaking the courts, and it is there that we need to start.
Obama, stop, just stop.
I think we are already down the trail...the pro fag rulings are in that vein.
” Excerpting their own blog is not illegal nor against the rules”
Good luck with that. Rhodes/Oxford scholars have populated the SC for quite awhile now.
“.......Why else would one cite it? If they cannot find a basis for their decisions in American law and legal tradition, they look to the laws and norms of foreign countries to justify their decisions.”
What’s most outrageous IMO is the Leftist tendency to skip the “.......If they cannot find a basis for their decisions in American law and legal tradition,....”, and go directly to “....they look to the laws and norms of foreign countries to justify their decisions.
It’s been a controversy for several administrations at this point.
“when courts start deciding based on who you are as opposed to what the law is , its over”
Well it’s over then because there are a lot of wetbacks
walking around like they own the place and the fuzz
refuses to do anything about it.
Message from the boss:
I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR,
not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog,
but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers
and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger cant or refuses do that,
and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it,
then Id just as soon he doesnt post here.
And if he continues posting brief excerpts only
and obviously attempting to draw away our participants
while loudly complaining about it,
then I have no sympathy for his complaints
and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.
Furthermore, your blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum
and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material
and if you would actually join in on the discussion here on FR.
Were not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog.
552 posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2010 5:06:19 PM by Jim Robinson
Once courts were supposed to be impartial judges of fact but soon courts will be expected to be activists.
Conservatives, even if they are 100% right, are going to lose in court. Welcome to Venezuela/Zimbabwe.
The problem is standards of state licensure. A conservative legislature, understanding the lack of representation among the poor and middle classes (as opposed to either only being represented when their interests coincide with the wealthy; see "ACLU") might well be interested in private standards for validation of competency. That would blow the game wide open.
And just think, there’s THREE MORE LONG YEARS to suffer thought this self inflicted nightmare.
Didn’t Valerie Jarrett say that they had a couple of judges ready to go - or words to that effect?
Oh look! The idiot boy is making the sign for Satan.
The man possesses no honor, holds nothing dear, displays no personal or official honesty, or sense of shame that he is violating his sacred Oath of Office every single day; he has no uprightness of purpose, no love of country, no respect for the everyday citizen (clinging as they do to their guns and religion), and he has zero appreciation for the national heritage of the United States of America.
What he does have is an unbendable commitment to every debunked and discredited progressive brain fart of the past 100 years - even though he KNOWS they will destroy the country.
But, thats precisely what he is after: the end of the United States as a force and influence for good in the world, and as a place for free men and women and their families to stand strong and proud.
The man is disreputable, debased, disgusting, and perverted. He is the shame of us all. He is our albatross. He is the mindless zombie walker of our own making, who is the personification of evil, who keeps on coming and cannot be diverted.
He must be fought relentlessly, at all times, on every battlefield, in every state, county and town, without regard for self, expecting victory but accepting of defeats along the way. We must not tire or weaken our resolve in the face of setbacks we know will come.
We must persevere; we will win back our country from the leeches, perverts, and social vampires that are this mans natural allies.
Of course this will have to be accomplished without any help from most of those elected to Congress.
If he’s trying to pat himself on the back for starting this, he’s only about what, twenty-three decades too late?
Yes, thank you. So going after the courts is no surprise.
They will empty the prison systems on the public, social justice!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.