1963 advertisements. He owned a nightclub, he could afford those prices.
Posted on 11/20/2013 7:46:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
It has been 50 years since President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and most of the world still wrongly believes that the culprit was the CIA, or the FBI, or the mafia, or right-wing American businessmen. It has been also 50 years since the Kremlin started an intense, worldwide disinformation operation, codenamed “Dragon,” aimed at diverting attention away from the KGB’s connection with Lee Harvey Oswald. Not unrelated are the facts that Oswald was an American Marine who defected to Moscow, returned to the United States three years later with a Russian wife, killed President Kennedy, and was arrested before being able to carry out his plan to escape back to Moscow. In a letter dated July 1, 1963, Oswald asked the Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C., to grant his wife an immediate entrance visa to the Soviet Union, and to grant another one to him, separtably (misspelling and emphasis as in the original).
The Kremlin’s “Dragon” operation is described in my book Programmed to Kill: Moscow’s Responsibility for Lee Harvey Oswald’s Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. In 2010, this book was presented at a conference of the Organization of American Historians together with a review by Prof. Stan Weber (McNeese State University). He described the book as “a superb new paradigmatic work on the death of President Kennedy” and a “must read for everyone interested in the assassination.”[i]
Programmed to Kill is a factual analysis of that KGB crime of the century committed during the Khrushchev era. In those days, the former chief KGB adviser in Romania had become the head of the almighty Soviet foreign espionage service and pushed me up to the top levels of the Soviet bloc intelligence clique....
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
A Few Questions that Beg for Answers
Why did RFK ask LBJ: “Why did you have my brother killed?” Was he off his rocker? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tclZrJiJSL0
Why were fingerprints of Mac Wallace, a known assassin who worked for LBJ and Ed Clark, found in the sniper’s nest on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository?
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKwallaceM.htm
Why did LBJ exclaim to his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown after a meeting at Dallas house of Clint Murchison (owner of the Book Depository), attended by J. Edgar Hoover, Nixon, Mafia kingpins, and CIA allies of LBJ) on the eve of the assassination: “After tomorrow, those goddamn Kennedys will never embarrass me again. That’s no threat. That’s a promise”? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79lOKs0Kr_Y
Who desparately wanted to be president and thought JFK had stolen the Democrtaic nomination from him? Who was going to be dropped from the JFK ticket in 1964 because of financial scandals? Who invited JFK to Dallas? Who changed the president’s route to pass by the Book Depository? Who moved to secure the limousine and JFK’s body immediately after the assassination? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSXQYvm57YM
Who set up the Warren Commission and demanded Oswald be found to be the sole gunman? Who controlled the police in Dallas and the FBI and CIA in Washington? The answer: Lyndon Baines Johnson. LBJ had the motive, the means, the opportunity, the history of elimnating his opponents, and the quotations that point to his arrangement and approval of the JFK assassination and vigorous cover-up. LBJ was the clear winner.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiqnU3rbsow
That LBJ was responsible does not deny CIA/FBI/Secret Service and Mafia involvement but strengthens the case against him as he provided the leadership and federal resources to coordinate the assassination, select a patsy (in the CIA’s False Defector Program), and dominate the news media, such that to this day most news outlets are afraid to challenge the Warren Commission’s official story. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjU2LtVGxN0
Why do the majority of Texans and a majority of Europeans believe LBJ was behind the murder of JFK? Why do we have such difficulty in accepting the fact that a coup d’etat happened on our watch, given that we elected (and re-elected) a Muslim Marxist with no substantive experience, no discernable achievements, and a profound hatred of things American, i.e., our Constitution and our values, as our most recent president?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3094134/posts, posting #16.
No doubt but that conspiracy theories advance when key questions go unanswered and the evidence contradicts physics and forensics. The reason: there are no good answers that would be satisfactory to the media, which is afraid to even raise the possibility of LBJ’s involvement. New books out by Bill O’Reilly and Vincent Bugliosi duck the tough questions, and unlike a good murder mystery, we don’t have time to pay attention to all those important details that are available or to reason logically to a correct solution.
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-men-who-killed-kennedy/
The crime may never be solved in a way most Americans will agree, especially if the documents still withheld don’t get released in the latter part of this century, as promised. Accepting that LBJ was a ringleader-killer would then cause us to admit that our great political system, the widely acclaimed democratic experiment with all its checks and balances, didn’t work, that we might be less pure than we thought we were. The Giant has gone back to sleep.
That theory is ALWAYS!!!!!!!!!!!! bandied about. It is pure BS. People go for conspiracy theories, not because of some inability to accept horror (that implies depth and thinking to humans), but because people are ignorant GD f’ing fools. Period. Con. theories are fun, exciting, and allow the ignorant to pretend to be world-wise. “See how cynical I am? That’s because I know the REAL story, and you do not.” People, are ignorant, stupid, and lazy. Remember, 60% (IIRC) of voting age Americans cannot name the vice president.
If the rich and famous die for no good reason, what does that mean for the rest of us.
There are a lot of them out there that are pretty fun too. The limo driver turned and fired the fatal shot, Jackie shot him, Super secret agents with captured aliens killed him for asking about the Roswell Incident.
What I find disturbing is that less than half of the U.S. population think like I do that there was no conspiracy and a single man acted alone and killed the President.
I guess for most it’s just too hard to wrap their head around the prospect that a single, unimpressive individual could take down the leader of the free world.
The Jack Ruby aspect is a non-starter for me. Oswald was supposed to be transported at 10 am. He was delayed because they decided to interview him one last time before the transfer. At 10 am, Ruby was still at home in his boxers. He didn’t leave his house until almost 11 am and the date stamp on the Western Union transfer he made was at 11:17. From there he just wandered back over to the police station like he had ever since Oswald had been detained. It was just dumb luck that he settled in right at the time that Oswald was finally being moved, over an hour late. I think his was just an impulsive act.
A known “mobbed-up” strip club owner just happens to be the one who “impulsively” shoots the alleged assassin/patsy in what appears to be a mob hit on a president? Pull the other one, it has bells on it.
If they had moved him when they announced they were going to, Ruby would not have been there. Pretty simple.
Or one of his friends among the cops and clerks let him know about Oswald’s movements?
What evidence do you have to support that? Plus, Ruby was in transit at the time they made the decision to go ahead and move him. How did they contact him?
1963 advertisements. He owned a nightclub, he could afford those prices.
So you are saying that he had one of these and he had it with him. What proof do you have that he ever owned one of these much less used one that day.
You see how far you are having to reach to make this work. This is why conspiracies get the traction they do. People refuse to accept the fact that sometimes the simplest answer, is the right one.
But lets chase this rabbit a little further down the rabbit hole.
Jack Ruby is traveling around with a Motorola TLD-110 Telephone in his car. He gets a call from a police buddy at the station telling him that they are going to move Oswald and that he will be in the parking garage at 11:21. You have to be precise here because if he had not been shot he would only have been in that garage for about a minute.
Now logically he would want to get over there right away. You never know what might detain you and you have a very narrow window of opportunity. No, he doesn’t do that, he goes to the Western Union office (I’m assuming he didn’t take said call while carrying this phone to the WU office since that definitely would have been reported). He had a guy in front of him. He doesn’t worry about how long the guy in front of him’s transaction might take, and he wouldn’t know. He doesn’t come off as anxious or in a hurry. He just patiently waits for the guy to finish his transaction. He then continues with his own transaction which he finishes at 11:17. He has now given himself just four minutes to get up the block, hope that he doesn’t get stopped at the entrance to the garage, and get himself into position to kill Oswald because that’s his plan.
That seems like a real risky venture if you are planning to do a contract kill based on information sent to you by the police (which are now implicated in the crime).
Seems more logical that he finished his transaction, saw that they was some activity going on over at the station, wandered over and was blessed with some real lousy security and an armored truck that wouldn’t fit down the ramp. This put him in the right place to make the impulsive decision to kill Oswald since he was right there in front of him.
That's my theory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.