Hearings On Presidential Power - Allegation Obama Disregarding Costitution - The Kelly File

http://www.youtube.com ^ | December 2, 2013 | You Tube

[Whenifhow]

Hearings On Presidential Power - Allegation Obama Disregarding Costitution - The Kelly File

[Whenifhow]

Hearing today
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/113th/hear_12032013.html

Subject: The President’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws

Tuesday 12/03/2013 | 10:00 a.m.
http://www.c-span.org/

4 minutes
Hearings On Presidential Power - Allegation Obama Disregarding Costitution - The Kelly File

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAyYY5iOVcQ

[Diogenesis]

These people will be audited by the IRS immediately,
and their families murdered by government
— by denial of medical/surgical care —
the following years.

[Ray76]

Another video link:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/hclive02

[TMSuchman]

Why is there no cry for impeachment is beyond me. But I guess the rules & laws are for only us little people!

[Whenifhow]

Thanks!
From Nov 6
Cornyn: ‘Lying To Congress is a Crime, But Unfortunately Lying To The American People Is Not’

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/11/06/Cornyn-Lying-To-Congress-is-a-Crime-But-Unfortunately-Lying-To-The-American-People-Is-Not

[maxwellsmart_agent]

It is about time they did this. Obama has refused to inforce federal laws with regard to immigration and 0ther issues. He has violated the Constitution that by oath he has promised to uphold. He should be removed from office.

[Whenifhow]

Committee Member list
http://judiciary.house.gov/about/members.html

Witness List

Mr. Jonathan Turley
Professor
George Washington University Law School

Mr. Nicholas Rosenkranz
Professor
Georgetown University Law Center

Mr. Simon Lazarus
Senior Counsel
Constitutional Accountability Center

Mr. Michael F. Cannon
Director of Health Policy Studies Cato Institute

[don-o]

Some sort of demonstration going on.

Thanks for the ping.

[Whenifhow]

yes - demonstrators - never seen that before in a hearing

[don-o]

Forgot your sarc tag there - How can you forget Code Pink? I wonder who they were this morning? Looks like they settled in and were not ejected.

[TMSuchman]

They looked like a “native American” group holding a prayer before the start of the meeting.

[Whenifhow]

I was referring to latest hearings that I saw.

Code Pink! I should have realized, but didn’t see the color - only caught a glimpse of it when it happened and heard the chair made a reference to the need for order.

So they were seated and now quiet it appears.

[don-o]

I don’t think it was Code Pink in the House today.

Me - I am up for Articles of Impeachment coming forth as a result of this hearing.

[bandleader]

For those of you”MORONS”who weren’t listening:When Obongo was asked(2008)how he felt about The US Constitution,his reply was:”I Find It To Be A Flawed Document”!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Whenifhow]

Mr. Jonathan Turley
Professor
George Washington University Law School

http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/113th/12032013/120313%20Turley%20Testimony.pdf

Find the other testimony documents here
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/113th/hear_12032013.html

[Sharkfish]

I just watched Professor Turley’s opening statement. He’s an Obama supporter but a brilliant Constitutionalist. (Taught me in his first law school job at Tulane).

Very simply put, he believes that Obama’s refusal to enforce numerous laws, his changing of laws’ explicit provisions and the ever expanding and powerful federal agencies are a threat to the delicate balance of power implemented through our Madisonian form of government. And it is up to Congress to reign him in.

He’s right, but there will be no reigning in without a Republican, if not conservative, majority in both houses. The Dems would sacrifice the Republic for power.

[bgill]

hussein will merely write out an EO that he can’t be impeached and that will be the end of it.

[thouworm]

Mr. Nicholas Rosenkranz
Professor, Georgetown University Law Center

He wrote the ""Subjects of the Constitution," the single most downloaded article about Constitutional interpretation in the history of the Social Science Research Network."

Brief Volokh Conspiracy blog post about "Subjects of the Constitution" here

[Ray76]

Simon Lazarus doesn’t deal with fact but ascribes political motives to critics and intent to the authors of PPACA.

The law is quite clear on the issue of subsidies in state-run exchanges v. federally-run exchanges as the other witnesses have testified.

The PPACA: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/html/PLAW-111publ148.htm