Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Terrible Truth About Abraham Lincoln and the Confederate War
Snap Out of it, America! ^ | 1/20/14 | Michael Hutcheson

Posted on 01/20/2014 1:42:16 PM PST by mhutcheson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-444 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants

My ancestor - volunteered to fight against the North and Lincoln’s Army - and traveled from Texas to join up. This is what he wrote about his motivation: “Governments are made for man, not man for governments.” ~Junius “June” Kimble, Company “A” 14th Tennessee Volunteers~. He was a hell of a sharpshooter and returned to Texas after the war. Our family gave one defender to the Alamo and another was Secretary and signer of the Constitution of the Republic of Texas. We will go wherever there’s a standing armed militia and a free state. We’re looking for one now.


121 posted on 01/20/2014 3:00:47 PM PST by februus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: lakecumberlandvet
Isn’t Ft. Sumter located in Charleston, SC? Major Robert Anderson, commander of the Union forces occupying Ft. Sumter, refused repeated calls to abandon the fort. The Union’s blockade of Charleston harbor was effectively the first shot fired.

The Fort was in an inlet to the river, and was built by the Federal Government. There was not even an island there until it was built.

There was no blockade before the war. lol

122 posted on 01/20/2014 3:03:37 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
We? Were YOU on Lincoln’s staff when he suspended the writ of habeas corpus and imprisoned thousands of people for speaking out against the war. If so, you ought to be tried, found guilty, and hanged.

Should those that fire on American troops be tried for treason and hanged?

123 posted on 01/20/2014 3:06:19 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
P.S. Did you even read he article. IT brings up the subject of tyranny.

Well, then I didn't change the subject then, did I?

124 posted on 01/20/2014 3:07:25 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Oh, shut up.

Second the motion ...

125 posted on 01/20/2014 3:08:01 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Who cares who built it?

Whoever builds it owns it. I was not on any state's soil.

126 posted on 01/20/2014 3:08:39 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

http://www.ashevilletribune.com/archives/censored-truths/Morrill%20Tariff.html

I am not sure about the 85% deal but it is documented many places that 90%of US revenue was collected through tariffs and the South took a big hit with the tariffs and it benefited the North, twice some say.


127 posted on 01/20/2014 3:09:39 PM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Oh, dear, another injection of the unpleasant truth.

Thank you for the link.


128 posted on 01/20/2014 3:11:34 PM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger

There was no blockade before the war. lol
___
Then why were the Union troops there? Playing tiddlywinks?


129 posted on 01/20/2014 3:14:47 PM PST by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

No longer a delusion, alas.

That bunch in Washington plans to stay. They’ve consolidated their hold on power, and they know their criminality will be prosecuted if they loose their hold on government.

Secession, or as I now see it, “self-determination,” is increasingly the only option left to us.

Times are different; Washington has eviscerated the constitution and surrendered our sovereignty. The United Nations will not let the Federal Government conduct another Civil War and Washington has no moral or legal standing to defy them.


130 posted on 01/20/2014 3:15:47 PM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Should those that fire on American troops be tried for treason and hanged?

That's a good question — the Constitution defines treason as such: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

Therefore, we should ask: is the firing on of American troops necessarily the waging of war on the several states?
No, obviously not — there are [American] troops who are not even citizens of the States.

In fact, you could raise an army and attack DC, burning it to the ground and definitionally it would not be treason.

131 posted on 01/20/2014 3:16:30 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: lakecumberlandvet
Then why were the Union troops there? Playing tiddlywinks?

Guarding the inlet as always. They weren't stopping any mercantile ships before Sumter was fired on.

132 posted on 01/20/2014 3:18:48 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I don’t think you understand the concept of “Levying War” . lol


133 posted on 01/20/2014 3:20:36 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary; All
Lincoln was a criminal and DiLorenzo squashes him like a grape.

I read most of O'Reilly's Killing Lincoln. Based on what you've indicated, it doesn't surprise me that pro-big federal government O'Reilly presented Lincoln as a hero.

134 posted on 01/20/2014 3:21:59 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Everything you say is absolutely true, Lincoln was no saint, and poor Irish Union conscripts did not fight to free black people. Lincoln even let Union slave states keep their slaves for awhile which was both brilliant politically and more than a little cynical.

But in the end of the day Lincoln freed the slaves. History looks at results, not character, methods, or intentions. In the end, Lincoln freed a race of people from bondage and put an end to an unambiguously savage and evil institution. Because of this, everything he and his army did is justified.


135 posted on 01/20/2014 3:22:29 PM PST by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Lincoln did what he had to do to save some collective abstrtaction “the Union”. He is repsonsible for the death of what would today be approx 7,000,000 Americans. Plus many more wounded and maimed. Makes al qaeda look like pikers.


136 posted on 01/20/2014 3:24:29 PM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

I hope one day we look at abortion the way we today look at slavery. Something evil our ancestors did out of ignorance.


137 posted on 01/20/2014 3:24:40 PM PST by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Ah, but it's the states that the levying of war applies to which makes for treason, not the federal government — notice the plural 'them' instead of the singular 'it' which would be used in talking of a single entity. It is firmly established that DC is not a state, therefore levying war upon it cannot be treason unless it "gives aid and comfort" to the enemies of the several states.

Given that the federal government has moved to be in a position where it denies the states almost all sovereignty (read the dissenting opinions of the SB 1070 case) and looks to be open to assisting in an invasion (termed 'amnesty' or 'immigration reform') it could well be argued that the federal government is itself such an enemy of the several states.

138 posted on 01/20/2014 3:30:11 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: mhutcheson
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

bove was written by the great southerner Thomas Jefferson in 1776.

Please provide the formal document what was stated at the time by the states of the south wishing to leave.... let them speak for themselves and declare their cause in full in there own words

139 posted on 01/20/2014 3:31:58 PM PST by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Yes, a Union controlled by rich oligarchs committed to the destruction of personal liberty. Goldman Sachs anyone?


140 posted on 01/20/2014 3:32:11 PM PST by majormaturity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-444 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson