Posted on 02/23/2014 3:09:07 PM PST by butterdezillion
The photos of the Loretta Fuddy Cessna crash that Josh Lang provided to the media? They weren't of the same plane. The plane that crashed with Fuddy in it had a window between the door and the tail; Lang's photos don't. (I've got photos at my blog and in the first post I'll post them so you can compare the 2 planes)
Lang apparently had photos of a DIFFERENT plane ditching in the water and gave them to the media, claiming they were of this crash, and apparently the media didn't check out the genuineness of the photos...
Now why would Lang do that? Why would he post images of the area with no passengers or anything else in the water ANYWHERE, rather than taking photos of what was actually there and giving those to the media?
I see you are doubling down on your Fuddy isn’t dead theory. In that case you are going to have to explain who has got her and how the hundreds of mourners at her open casket funeral saw nothing amiss. Don’t tell me - they are all in on it. Well, if they are all in on it, I refer to my previous question as to why she couldn’t simply be taken into protective custody with a knock on the door, since anyone that knows her are all in on it anyway.
I’ve already addressed both of those things. You just aren’t listening. I see no point in saying it all over again.
No you haven’t at all. Please explain how none of the mourners noticed in an open casket funeral that Fuddy was not in fact dead.
Good synopsis of the situation.
An observation:
some years back I went to my grandfathers funeral; they had the whole open coffin embalmed body deal.
I commented to my mom after going past his coffin, that grandpa looked like wax (as in wax museum).
She said that that look was from the embalming process.
Similar for when my mom passed and my father in law passed, they had had that done, (but no fancy funeral) and they too had that ‘wax’ look.
It is entirely possible that given the close family members involved in this Fuddy thing, that a switcheroo was done, and there was a body in the casket.... just not a real one.
And, as you said, if they can force silence upon some twenty to thirty Benghazi witnesses, they sure can pay off family members, fellow passengers, etc to keep quiet in this instance.
If someone said to me that I had to be a passenger in an aircraft that was going to crash into the ocean in order to fake someone’s death, I wouldn’t get on board. It’s absurd to believe that anyone would.
“Ray76, the “this is too crazy” argument is about the only argument that people have used on ALL the eligibility evidence. “
Describing your theory as crazy is an understatement. Seriously, you may want to seek help. I say that with all sincerity.
So.. folks who don't buy into the latest crackpot theory are trolls?
They could easily have had a mock-up of her, if the photos in the newscast were real. But those photos were photoshopped, leading me to believe there was something else in her casket. She belonged to a cult where anything goes so anything is possible. I don’t know exactly what was done but there is good evidence that the kitv clip was photoshopped and that doesn’t make sense if everything was as everybody is claiming.
And I’ve said this all many times before, though you might not have seen all the times because you were just called in recently to waste my time with ad hominems. Do you really have nothing better to do with your life, or is this a paid job?
Congratulations. YOu just affirmed what I just said. I’ll put another chalk mark for another person who ridiculed rather than reasoned.
Rumor has it that he owns a convenience store in Comodoro Rivadavia. I see it's a balmy 75°F there, and the food is good, so why not fly down with your GoPro and check up on him!
One might well ask you the same thing.
I wouldn't put it past Obama to hire folks to make up outlandish and ridiculous theories of wild conspiracies in order to put a clown's face on the eligibility issue.
Whirly Taitz is another example.
One more chalk mark.
At least we know definitively what happened to JFK.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-man-can-remember-exactly-where-he-was-what-he,34647/
Have a look at butter’s blog if you want to read some really vile and threatening trolls. Just pointing out the tail number was in a flightaware database on another plane is enough for the alinsky tactics. I just hope that those dissenting and challenging butter are doing so out of a belief that the conclusion is wrong and not that they are being used as trolls/alinsky-ites by this Administration and this Administration DOES have a blogging response/comments division run out of the DOJ. Some of of the responses could be kinder, despite their belief that butter is wrong/off base.
I tend to believe that yes, Fuddy is deceased BUT as in many things that surround “the One”, there are many oddities and “mistakes” and a HUGE amount of ridicule for anyone questioning Barry’s history which is NOT readily available. Barry, like me, did NOT live in the dark ages in which information/pals in school/pictures aren’t available. Butter is putting her neck out there which is more than I can say for those that did not and refused to Vet Barack Obama when he was a Senator and as Presidential candidate.
sorry, forgot to pin you butter
one last thought although i have many, lol, is that when Barry was running for term number 1 AND suspicion, (alinksyed as “birthers”) that all was not as it seemed concerning Barry, i had hope that as others did (including those using the alinkyed-slur of “birthers), that the damage done to this Country by “the One”, would be enough that he would not be re-elected. many others here said to not give play to the “birther” issue there were so many things about Barry and his job as President that we could use to stop him. well, that didn’t work out so well. the birther issue had nothing to do with his reelection. it was ridiculed and out of play by then. a complicit media and Americans happy with handouts were enough to reelect the man and his agenda. Karl Rove and the GOP elites didn’t do so well at stopping the reelection of “I Won” and our Country is sunk because of the second term of “I Won”. i believe that one term of “I Won” and Pelosi’s hammer was survivable, but two? nope and Barry has three years to finish with his wrecking ball.
” So.. folks who don’t buy into the latest crackpot theory are trolls? “
. . . so, what can I say . . . >>> If the shoe fits !
Thank you for explaining your theory, now we can get to work proving or debunking it - becasue thatmis what this thread is for right? To get to the truth. Is my understanding of your theory correct? Fuddy was taken into protected custody to prevent her saying something, yes? If that is the theory, can you please explain why the FBI didn’t simply knock on her door and take her away in a SUV?
Takes less than a minute, costs nothing and is much lower risk than causing two plane crashes over open water and faking an open casket funeral.
Previously you have said the FBI wouldn’t just arrest her because too many family and friends would question her sudden disappearance. But they do it hundreds of times every week - why is Fuddy different? But even that makes no sense at all since in your alternate theory, those exact same people and hundreds more are bribed by the regime to stay quiet about the fake crashes and fake funeral. So they can’t be trusted to keep quite about an FBI arrest (and why would it even be necessary to keep it quiet - who the he££ cares??) but they can be trusted to not say a word about a faked plane crash and a faked open casket funeral. There is no internal logic to this theory, and therefore I suggest it fails.
Maybe you can explain why the FBI didn’t just take her away in a SUV. But you also need to explain this. You claim the plane crashes were faked to cover Fuddy’s disappearance. Therefore the eight random strangers that were on that flight with her must have done either of the following:
1. The 8 random strangers that were the other passengers on the plane were told in advance that this was a faked crash - that the plane would crash into open water and they would be rescued by helicopter. Knowing this, all 8 nevertheless agreed to board the plane and risk their lives, to save the Goverment embarrassment over Fuddy. They boarded a plane certain to crash with all their luggage that would certainly be lost at sea, and even though they knew they were going to crash into the sea, not one of them had the foresight to put their life jacket on in advance. They all thought it would be more fun to put it on whilst bobbing away, fully dressed in a swell in open water. If you don’t believe that happened, and which sane person would, then you must believe the following alternate theory:
The 8 people boarded a plane not knowing the Government planned to crash it to avoid some unspecified embarrassment. After rescueing these people from up to an hour in open water, it was explained to them that the Government just risked their lives for the flimsiest of reasons. They all love the government so much they all agree to not say a word about it. They attend her open casket funeral without saying a word that her body wasn’t there. Not a single tweet, or comment on FB. Not one from all the hundreds in on the conspiracy. And there’s more. The two telivision stations filming the funeral do not notice that Fuddy isn’t in the casket. And
ABC start “pixellating” their TV film when they read on FR that you have pinged people to a discusion - rather like when you thought Microsoft was sending you secret messages, but they were simply standard the error messages we all get.
So which do you believe? The 8 knew they were going to crash and went on the plane anyway. Or they were told afterwards (by who, when, where?)and didn’t have any problem with their lives being risked and their property lost.
To believe either is absurd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.