Posted on 03/20/2014 4:16:07 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Edited on 03/20/2014 4:19:14 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Correction:
Bath House is on the down-low, dontcha know, Franklin?
At some point they will go too far and it will backfire one them.
In every revolution, the first to be killed are the homosexuals followed by the “free thinkers” (libertines not the truly freedom minded nor the intellectuals)
The left is fomenting a civil war, it will be demographic not geographic like the last one.
I will pray that more Christians are willing to speak the truth (in love, of course).
Russia also just stopped allowing adoptions to countries that permit childhood euthanasia, another pro-life action.
Graham is right. There is a large preponderance of pedophiles among male homosexuals. I agree with outlawing the homosexual act. They’re going to do it anyway, much like people are going to get drunk and beat people up. But at least society has its say about the wrongness of the act.
Yes, Beck would. As would many of the people I go to church with, sadly. They would wholeheartedly agree with laws against drinking booze on Sunday (which I think is nonsense), but would freak out if you proposed a law against the homosexual act, which is actually sinful and a harm to another human being.
I had not heard that. That is good news.
I hadn't heard that, got a source describing that common trait of all revolutions?
Have you ever heard of the book “After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s”? The homosexual agenda has known what it was doing for a long time. Read the reviews and the review rebuttals and you’ll get a gist of what the book is about. Here is what one reviewer said: “I think those that think this book is great because they support the gay agenda are missing the point. The book encourages deceptive marketing to advance its goals. It encourages acceptance of homosexuality based on intimidation, lies and half truths. Do the people who advocate this in the name of gay rights really believe that the ends justify the means, even if the means are evil and abusive? Which brings up another question, if it is impossible to convince people of the goodness of homosexuality without lying about it, have you really convinced them? As soon as they find out the truth I would think they would be angry at being duped.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.