Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antonov 225:World's Largest Aircraft With Six Engines
YouTube ^ | June 26, 2013 | Rory Lushman

Posted on 04/20/2014 9:43:55 PM PDT by lbryce

Original Title:Antonov 225 Mriya Departs Manchester Airport, 26th June 2013 Antonov 225 (UR-82060) finally leaves Manchester Airport after being delayed 24 hours. The huge aircraft is seen departing runway 23L on Wednesday 26th June 2013. The aircraft certainly pulled the crowds in. Just before the Antonov crosses onto runway two, Thomson 787 Dreamliner, G-TUIC lands on 23R.

The Antonov 225 is currently the largest aircraft in the world.


(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antonov225; worldslargestplane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
This is the mother of all planes. A super massive flying whale with 6 engines to send it soaring aloft. In the days when the Soviets copied our shuttle and created the Buran (Blizzard in Russian)The Antov 225 is what it flew back on.


1 posted on 04/20/2014 9:43:55 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I think I saw one of those land at Moffatt some years back. It was a freaking monster.


2 posted on 04/20/2014 9:52:15 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Holy crap!

That thing must burn 20,000 bucks worth of kerosene an hour....


3 posted on 04/20/2014 9:56:39 PM PDT by Bobalu (Four Cokes And A Fried Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This one is in Ukrainian livery, they possess some too

I saw it land at Long Beach once...


4 posted on 04/20/2014 9:57:20 PM PDT by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

They had to sit there and rev the turbines while holding the wheel brakes for several minutes, to the point that the fuselage was visibly bobbing up and down and the wings were shaking, just to get that barge off the ground before the runway ran out. It’s impressive in a way, but it’s a caricature in a way, too. Overkill for overkill’s sake, especially the rear landing gear.


5 posted on 04/20/2014 9:59:19 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I have seen one of those parked at ATL when they came over for airshows in the mid 90s.It is a monster.


6 posted on 04/20/2014 9:59:33 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Would feel much better flying in a Boeing......


7 posted on 04/20/2014 10:03:56 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican; HANG THE EXPENSE
Only one AN-225 was made, it was meant to carry Soviet's Buran as piggyback.

http://ram-home.com/ram-old/an-225buran-vak200102.jpg

8 posted on 04/20/2014 10:11:11 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

dunno, the 777s disappear at random.


9 posted on 04/20/2014 10:12:44 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

~Overkill for overkill’s sake, especially the rear landing gear.~

In fact these overkill landing gear makes perfect sense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6bKCsJd2K0
Overshooting runway is not a big problem.


10 posted on 04/20/2014 10:14:22 PM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I missed why this is being posted today,if the flight occured in June ‘13. Why?


11 posted on 04/20/2014 10:21:18 PM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Eli Lilly chartered one back in the early 2000’s to move some equipment to San Juan. I got an up close and personal on it.

Great looking airplane, but a piece of crap up close. Threadbare tires, busted rivets, pilot seats mounted on wooden blocks, fans screwed into the cockpit dash, due to inop air conditioning, etc.

The American Trans Air mechs worked on it for free, just to have it in their logbooks. Was on the ground, broke, at IND for almost 3 weeks.


12 posted on 04/20/2014 10:23:11 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Not early 2000’s, more like late 90’s, now that I think about it.


13 posted on 04/20/2014 10:24:30 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

That’s an effing big plane.


14 posted on 04/20/2014 10:25:42 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I was a passenger on a C5A Galaxy back when it was the largest cargo plane in the world. Looks like this thing could carry a few C5As in it’s cargo bay.


15 posted on 04/20/2014 10:38:12 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I saw one in Las Vegas once. In reality, there were very few built. They do plan to make more.

One of the reasons for the very heavy duty landing gear is the USSR (and possibly Russian) requirement for military aircraft to be able to operate on semi-improved runways. Our planes would probably disintegrate while attempting to take off/land on many of their runways. Of course, there is a severe weight/performance penalty for this.


16 posted on 04/20/2014 10:58:31 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Wonder why some Euro country hasn't tried to re-engine that beast?

Imagine what it could haul with efficient, low carbon engines.

17 posted on 04/20/2014 11:02:20 PM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Why then Antonov AN-225 wasn’t called to haul Saddam Hussein’s 550 metric tons yellowcakes directly to Canada? It took 37 C-17 top-secret flights from Baghdad to Diego Garcia then shipped on SS Gopher State under heavy security to Canada. Under heavy security? Oh it was low-grade yellowcake, yeah right. How much yellowcake to make a U-235 anyway?


18 posted on 04/20/2014 11:02:44 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

;)


20 posted on 04/20/2014 11:10:04 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson