Posted on 05/19/2014 1:43:53 PM PDT by therightliveswithus
September 11th truthers, also known by many as the scum of the earth, have decided to take their disgusting actions one step further: they will be handing out fake brochures at the opening of the 9/11 Memorial Museum on its opening day. These fake brochures will push the disproven and crazed theory that the terrorist attacks on September 11 were carried out by the United States government and not by Muslim extremists.
The memorial will open this Wednesday, May 21st. That same day, 9/11 truthers will descend on the museum to hand out brochures which were designed to look like the memorial's actual ones. Instead, however, these brochures promise to tell the "other" story of 9/11, specifically that everything that is the truth really isn't.
You can see the cover of the fake brochure below, compared with the actual one:
The fake brochure is already online for reading here.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
If everyone who is handed one of these were to beat the shit out of the person handing it to them, this problem would soon go away.
The “Building 7 “ 9/11 conspiracy theory is like the “bad penny” that never goes away.
The crazies who believe this crap always tout building 7 as a smoking gun “proof”
...actually I think most “truthers” tout that the demolition freefall of Bldg 7 was just that. If you look at the video and think that was a natural fall, you must have loved the CIA video of the Flt 800 magically nosing up before falling out of the sky from that famous center tank explosion that never happened before or since sans modifications... ahhhh, we love the truth from our gobmint!
ymmv
Can I pick this up in the gift shop?
Let me ask you this.
Do you assign any damage at all to building 7 due to it's two giant neighbors crashing down next it it? If you do admit that damage could take place because of the adjacent buildings crashing below it's foundation, how much damage do you think building 7 took? Just a few broken window panes?
It wasn't too long after 9/11 that disgraced ex-President Bill Clinton came out and said they warned the Bush administration of a terrorist plot that was brewing but offered the Bush team no specifics.
So it may very well be that the Clinton administration knew the attack was coming and did nothing about it so President Bush would look bad.
Here is an easy question you can answer out in the open.
If a small building is nested between two larger buildings that are demolished, would the small building suffer any damage?
Here’s a good answer for what to do with unwanted brochures.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1841915/posts
9/11 Truthers are about as stupid as they come. They simply cannot fathom the fact that a 1700 degree fire can weaken steel by over 70%.
Just one good punch to the nose or a kick to the groin should do it. After about 20 punches/kicks even the most dense 911 truther would get it.
False flags have existed in other countries
False flags have existed in US History - Gulf of Tonkin
Was 9/11 a false flag? Maybe.
Do you have the same vehement distaste for “birthers” as 9/11 truthers?
Truther, huh?
The truthers are a bunch of nuts. Ignore them I say.
Thanks for posting this. These miserable people drive me crazy, a d unfortunately their numbers include some prominent people.
That kind of science and engineering is above my pay grade, but I am an Occam’s razor type. Think, for a moment, of all the stuff you have to believe to believe in this conspiracy( same with the moon landing conspiracy) What about United 93? What about the Pentagon? Who were these 19 hijackers if they weren’t the hi jackers? You have to believe that everybody from Bush and Cheney to Rudy Guiliani and the 911 widows were in on a conspiracy theory together. Human nature just isn’t that way.
A lot of Freepers feel that way towards anti-WOD people.
Oh, sorry, that's different. Right? LOL
Physics is big on Occam's razor, too. But hey, if you don't "do" physics, then by all means, don't consider it.
For 50% of your physics grade, answer this question: what is the difference between a building toppling over from a destabilized foundation, and a building dropping down straight into its own footprint at a speed equal to gravitational acceleration without resistance?
Jeez. Another truther?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.