Posted on 07/30/2014 5:44:29 AM PDT by grundle
Wikipedia is leftist. Unfortunately, it’s a one-of-a-kind resource upon which most the Free World relies for information.
How hard is it to re-post this on Wikipedia?
Perhaps if different, unique Freepers posted this each day for a month or two, Wikipedia might get the hint.
Loons are in charge of Wikipedia. They are little tin-pot dictators, anonymous and nasty as hell.
It’s long been known as wiki graffiti.
Wikipedia is just like Democratic Underground when it comes to what happens if you try to post something critical about Our Glorious Leader.
The Ministry of Truth ensures that all records are corrected and updated to align with the Party’s ideology.
Wiki is a great resource if you’re looking up lists of, say, Super Bowl champions, spaceflights, or Duck Dynasty episodes. As for political information, it’s a bit more problematic.
What transparency?
His supporters who serve as moderators on other web boards eagerly slap down any hint of the idea that he ain’t the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Then most of the free world is stupid.
On anything even remotely political or any kind of hot current social issue Wikipedia is decidedly leftist/liberal. I don’t trust it/use it for anything but technical, more cut and dried information.
The scumbag Obamarats are trying to change history just as the Islamarats in the Middle East.
"I'm okay as long as I don't lose power at midterms."
You can't see it because it's "transparent".
They also censor anti AGW facts.
Desperately trying to make everyone forget about the drivel you posted in this thread?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3186797/posts
Heh heh. Great image!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.