Posted on 11/04/2014 7:50:54 AM PST by therightliveswithus
In what election officials will likely deem a "calibration error," an electronic election computer switched Republican votes for Congress to Democrat votes.
The machine is in the 2nd Congressional District of Virginia. In that race, Scott Rigell is facing Suzanne Patrick.
However, in a video posted to YouTube today, a voter tries to vote for Rigell twice. Both times, though the voter clearly chooses Rigell, the vote is switched to Patrick:
And then the person votes:
The person undeniably tries to vote for Rigell, but the machine switches the vote. The person then tries to vote for Rigell again, but the vote is switched to Patrick again.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
NOT ONE REPORT IN THE WHO UNITED STATES OF A ‘RAT VOTE CHANGING TO A REPUBLICAN.
It is no mere coincidence that ALL of the vote switching “calibration errors” are switching R votes to D.
Come on guys. Is it not time for a revolt of some kind?
“Calibration error”
Revolt comes when we realize and accept that the ballot box of liberty is closed.
The left would actually be better off NOT stealing this one.
Я считаю, что совершенно неважно, кто и как будет в партии голосовать; но вот что чрезвычайно важно, это - кто и как будет считать голоса.
"I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how."
- Josef Stalin, 1923,as quoted in The Memoirs of Stalin's Former Secretary (1992) by Boris Bazhanov
The media has been very silent about “calibration errors” on voting machines.
Would the media have looked into this more, if we found machines switching Democrat votes to Republican?
If this was accidental and a calibration error, the faults would be roughly equally distributed between dem and rep. The fact that there has been NO reported incidence of a dem to a rep error is pretty damning evidence of deliberate, systemic, official fraud.
How many switched votes get thru before someone notices? This could easily sway the election.
How Virginia voted for Obama and started voting dem.
It is past the time. The tyranny and corruption today is worse than what it was at the time of King George III. It is time to retake the Republic and the Constitution.
Testing it out to make sure Hillary beats Jeb???
Total fraud. People need prison time.
All it would take is an Attorney General of the State that actually believed in “The Law” to have the machines in question impounded and then reverse engineered to see exactly what malicious code was installed, then start the Prosecutions as well as a New Election.
This could be done rather quickly by the way if there was such a thing as a Law Abiding Attorney General.
Here’s a great idea:
PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING!
Like how can this even work when it is obviously showing the wrong name pressed?
It would take a real idiot to sit there and see that and not say anything.
Notice how it’s an X and not a checkmark? Those not paying alot of attention may likley think the X means “Not this person”. This was done on purpose. The convention for voting is a checkmark. We need to find out who has anything to do with these machines and apply some societal pressure of the physical / terminal type.
I wish we could bring back optical scanning. Use black/blue pen and mark the person you want to vote for on a ballot, then let a optical scanning machine to count the mark
Most exams with multiple choices are done this way. Its fast, easy and accurate
PING!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.