Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Independence Day: Yearly rollback of laws & regulations (vanity)
Self

Posted on 11/06/2014 10:50:24 AM PST by kingu

I realize that not everyone is into activism, but I think this is one that most of us can get behind. A yearly requirement for all levels of government to nullify a body of laws each and every 4th of July.

It might be as simple as just putting to rest old blue laws, but really, the meat of it should be rolling back all those inane rules and regulations that effectively mean every person commits a felony just through normal day to day living.

Yes, it'll take a lot of work to put together a list of laws for each 4th's axing, and of course, there are plenty of people who pushed those laws in the first place who will want to defend them. Great, let them defend them, let them justify their continued existence.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS:
For some bizarre reason, people measure the success of a legislature or even a town council by the volumes they add to the local laws and regulation each year. We need to start measuring how much they repeal each year, and make a target date of the 4th of July, Independence Day, as a yearly returning of freedoms to the citizens.
1 posted on 11/06/2014 10:50:24 AM PST by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingu

Or,

Require that two existing laws be repealed for every new law passed.


2 posted on 11/06/2014 10:57:45 AM PST by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
--and every piece of legislation passed should have an expiration date, requiring re-examination before passage.

--obviously much of the criminal code could be passed without much debate (murder, rape, etc.) but much could be let expire---

3 posted on 11/06/2014 10:58:35 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Oh, and no new law may contain more words than are included in the body of the original Constitution of the United states of America.


4 posted on 11/06/2014 10:58:54 AM PST by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I have long harbored the idea that no law can be proposed unless there is some other law that will be eliminated at the same time. I think that there are already enough laws on the books. Initially it will be easy to eliminate some old unenforced laws but eventually it might become more difficult. Good! the pols need to think before they legislate.


5 posted on 11/06/2014 10:59:38 AM PST by mistfree (It's a very uncreative man who can't think of more than one way to spell a word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

That’s been floated around for a very long time; only problem is, they can hide what they’re repealing. They also really don’t get the recognition for it. By making it a yearly activity, some politicians can actually crow about it, maybe feel good about appearing in that 4th of July parade. It also makes a list that people can see...

‘What? The only laws you could THINK to cancel were weight limits for school text books that are carried home daily by students?’


6 posted on 11/06/2014 11:00:17 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

By my count that’s about 4,300 words


7 posted on 11/06/2014 11:01:26 AM PST by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingu
"I've said it before and I'll say it again - we need to have term limits on laws and regulations, not our representatives. Our representatives need to be our representatives, not the bureaucracy's. Also a system of government where the bureaucracy has first class status is always going to be a bureaucratic despotism, and probably compromise on the subject is meaningless (aka hyena and goat arguing over what's for dinner...)."

I often argue for absolute sunset on all acts, regulations, and orders. Nothing should remain in force without explicit reaffirmation. I think something like this is absolutely required for the continued existence of a free society and as a check on returning to despotism.

There are other ideas with similar concept. For example Heinlein posited a bi-cameral system where one body passed laws and the other reversed them, creating a class of politicians with incentive to reduce the burden instead of adding to it. The reversers were more powerful than the enablers by a certain degree. This makes the veto obsolete (and possibly turns the chief executive into the chief administrator). The idea of having a special day to repeal ro forgive is ancient, eg consider Jubilee or manumission with a new king, etc.

8 posted on 11/06/2014 1:52:37 PM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson