Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five complete lies about America’s new $18 trillion debt level
Sovereign Man ^ | 12/02/2014 | Simon Black

Posted on 12/02/2014 2:16:56 PM PST by SeekAndFind

US-18-trillion-debt

December 2, 2014
Santiago, Chile

On October 22, 1981, the government of the United States of America accumulated an astounding $1 TRILLION in debt.

At that point, it had taken the country 74,984 days (more than 205 years) to accumulate its first trillion in debt.

It would take less than five years to accumulate its second trillion.

And as the US government just hit $18 trillion in debt on Friday afternoon, it has taken a measly 403 days to accumulate its most recent trillion.

There’s so much misinformation and propaganda about this; let’s examine some of the biggest lies out there about the US debt:

1) “They can get it under control.”

What a massive lie. Politicians have been saying for decades that they’re going to cut spending and get the debt under control.

FACT: The last time the US debt actually decreased from one fiscal year to the next was back in 1957 during the EISENHOWER administration.

FACT: For the last several years, the US government has been spending roughly 90% of its ENTIRE tax revenue just to pay for mandatory entitlement programs and interest on the debt.

This leaves almost nothing for practically everything else we think of as government.

2) “The debt doesn’t matter because we owe it to ourselves.”

This is probably the biggest lie of all. Two of the Social Security trust funds alone (OASI and DI) own $2.72 trillion of US debt.

The federal government owes this money to current and future beneficiaries of those trust funds, i.e. EVERY SINGLE US CITIZEN ALIVE.

I fail to see the silver lining here. How is it somehow ‘better’ if the government defaults on its citizens as opposed to, say, banks?

3) “They can always ‘selectively default’ on the debt”

Another lie. People think that the US government can pick and choose who it pays.

They could make a bing stink about China, for example, and then choose to default on the $2 trillion in debt that’s owed to the Chinese.

Nice try. But this would rock global financial markets and destroy whatever tiny shred of credibility the US still has.

Others have suggested that the government could selectively default on the Federal Reserve (which owns $2.46 trillion of US debt).

Again, possible. But given that the Fed (the issuer of the US dollar) would become immediately insolvent, the resulting currency crisis would be completely disastrous.

4) “It’s the NET debt that’s important”

Analysts often pay attention to a country’s “net debt” instead of its gross debt. If you have a million bucks in debt, and a million bucks in cash, then your ‘net debt’ is zero. It washes out.

Problem is, the US government doesn’t have any cash. The Treasury Department opened its business day on Friday morning with just $71.9 billion in cash, or just 0.39% of its total debt level.

Apple has more money than that.

5) “They can fix it by raising taxes”

No they can’t. Just look at the numbers. Since the end of World War II, US government tax revenue has consistently been roughly 17% of GDP.

They can raise tax rates, but it doesn’t move the needle in terms of revenue as a percentage of GDP.

In other words, the government’s ‘slice of the pie’ is pretty consistent.

You’d think with this obvious data that, rather than try to increase tax rates (ineffective), they’d do everything they can to help make a bigger pie.

Or better yet, just leave everyone the hell alone so we’re free to bake as much as we can.

But no. They have to regulate every aspect of people’s existence: How you are allowed to educate your children. What you can/cannot put in your body. How much interest you are entitled to receive on your savings.

All of this costs time, money, and efficiency. So do never-ending wars. The bombs. The drones. The airstrikes.

This isn’t about any single person or President. The problem is with the system itself.

History shows that every leading superpower from the past almost invariably fell to the same fate.

Great powers often feel that their wealth and success entitles them to spend recklessly and wage endless, arrogant wars. The Romans. The Ottoman Empire. The British.

History may not repeat but it certainly rhymes. And the lesson here is very clear: debt weakens a nation. It weakens a society.

Generations that will not even be born for decades will inherit these debts by complete accident of birth.

And the people in charge of the system have backed themselves into a corner where there is no way out other than to default– either on their creditors (creating a global financial crisis), the central bank (creating a currency crisis), or on the citizens themselves (creating an epic social crisis).

Bottom line: this is not a consequence-free environment. And while you can’t fix the debt problem, you can certainly reduce your own exposure to what happens next.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: debt; economy; governmentdebt

1 posted on 12/02/2014 2:16:56 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Eighteen Trillion ... yep, something to ‘sneeze’ at.


2 posted on 12/02/2014 2:26:45 PM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

1 trillion dollars is a stack of crisp new $100 dollar bills 630 miles high!?*


3 posted on 12/02/2014 2:31:24 PM PST by Recompennation (if the bill doesn't fit you can't convict)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"And while you can’t fix the debt problem, you can certainly reduce your own exposure to what happens next."

Let us guess...subscribe to SM's newsletter and pay him to help us through?

4 posted on 12/02/2014 2:36:48 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

#1 isn’t a lie. They CAN get it under control. They just don’t want to.


5 posted on 12/02/2014 2:38:47 PM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t worry folks, WWIII is just around the corner to save the day. War has always been the preferred way to cover up Financial Misdeeds by the MoneyChangers that control our Government.


6 posted on 12/02/2014 2:40:15 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s only currency.


7 posted on 12/02/2014 2:40:58 PM PST by Stentor (Maybe the Goldman Sachs thing is just a coincidence. /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recompennation

1 million seconds in the past... was 11 days ago
1 billion seconds in the past... was 32 years ago

18 Trillion seconds in the past... was 571,000 years ago


8 posted on 12/02/2014 2:42:12 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (Task 1: Accomplished, Task 2: Hold them Accountable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

“Let us guess...subscribe to SM’s newsletter and pay him to help us through? “

Actually, you can find lots of free information online to get you far, far down the road to reducing your exposure. Free. If all this article does is alert you to the possibility and you care enough to use Google, you will learn the solutions.

That said, his newsletter is worthwhile in many ways.


9 posted on 12/02/2014 3:33:59 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Spending a dollar a second or 3600 dollars per hour it would take 33000 years to blow through that one trillion bucks. Unbelievable is this monumental spending gone wild by the my administration wonder


10 posted on 12/02/2014 4:21:44 PM PST by Recompennation (if the bill doesn't fit you can't convict)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals
At what point do we allow ourselves to make the following final fatal statement? "A trillion here, a trillion there, pretty soon you're talking about real money." Guess what folks. We stopped talking about REAL money a long time ago.
11 posted on 12/02/2014 4:59:01 PM PST by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

trillions ... end to end would circle the moon and come back over eighteen times ... stacked on the other.


12 posted on 12/02/2014 5:01:13 PM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

the first step in solving any debt situation is... reducing costs. in this case, govt spending.

as mentioned, 90% of the annual revenues goes towards interest on the debt... and entitlements.

and since we cannot change the interest on the debt... we MUST cut entitlements.

btw, you can thank the democrats for STEALING the social security fund under johnson when they put it into the general fund. this is the source of a majority of the entitlements issue.


13 posted on 12/02/2014 5:03:23 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What really amuses me is that some of the same democrats who were messing their drawers over our debt when Bush was in office now verbally beat down anyone who gets onto dear leader over it.


14 posted on 12/02/2014 8:25:40 PM PST by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWB Patriot

And the worrying part is its all about to get much worse as the baby boomers retire. Add to this the likely cyclical downturn in the economy and you have a recipe for the further ballooning of debt in the years ahead. Looking back in a few years time a debt of only $18 trillion will be seen as the “good times”.


15 posted on 12/02/2014 10:59:14 PM PST by Scottishlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Scottishlibertarian

Well, those of us with actual abilities have a better chance of coming out of that. I’m not too worried.


16 posted on 12/03/2014 5:34:09 AM PST by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The article itself is full of lies and bad assumptions.

"1) “They can get it under control.”

Yes they can get it under control, but it's going to take doing something different than what they've done.

The worse thing they've done is lower the import tariffs back in the 60's. Since that time numerous American industries have been off-shored. Real wages in America have stagnated and are now going down. And while the free market always strives to achieve balance, and thus there is some rebounding in the employment market, it's resulting in jobs that just aren't the same quality of those in the past.

If we raised the import tariffs, put Americans back to work, restored American industries and reduced our dependency on foreign countries, we'd have a lot more government revenues and a lot fewer government outlays. That's how you balance the budget, and that's how you drive down deficits.

"2) “The debt doesn’t matter because we owe it to ourselves.”

There is a difference. The fact that we owe much of the debt to ourselves, means the wealth transfers within the U.S.. As opposed to flowing to other countries. But the fact remains, we owe too much to foreign countries.

"3) “They can always ‘selectively default’ on the debt”

They are not likely to default on the debt. If they actually get squeezed, they will inflate the dollar. There won't be a default. But the image of the U.S. dollar will be hurt, and there will be winners and losers from such a move.

"4) “It’s the NET debt that’s important”

They aren't wrong. It is the net debt that's important. If we borrowed to build infrastructure and create more wealth than we borrowed, the debt wouldn't be a bad thing. But we are borrowing to pay our people for not working, and we are borrowing from the chinese who took our jobs when we lowered the import tarriffs.

"5) “They can fix it by raising taxes”

Government can take a bigger piece of the pie. But that is likely to reduce the pie. The important thing is to grow the pie. Government's piece will grow along with it. We need to put Americans back to work. And that means stopping the cheap imports.

17 posted on 12/04/2014 9:47:33 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson