Posted on 12/07/2014 1:22:43 PM PST by Bettyprob
The best explanation I could ever come up with to explain it to students was that a color seen from a pigment is actually what it "rejects." It absorbs everything else. Something that's black absorbs all colors; That it means it absorbs "all the white." There is nothing to reflect, so it appears black. A red dress actually isn't red -- it's everything but red.
The black lettering suggests black people cannot spell. It is raciss.
A white person is more likely than not to have a father. The odds are better than three to one that a black child has a sperm donor.
I wonder if The Congressional White Caucus, The NAAWP (The National Association of White People) and the United Whitey College Fund are aware of these this injustice?
bkmk
re: “rejecting” colors. I kinda like that. Great explanation.
I’ve seen it said here that “White Privilege” is what the jealous call “White Competence.”
We should respond with that at every opportunity.
White privilege can more accurately be described as the long-term planning, intellect, and responsibility that are the norm among white people, coupled with their law-abidingness and desire to create and leave something for their descendants.
So yeah, it exists and no, it's not what the leftists think it is.
That’s not “privilege.” Privilege is, by definition, something GIVEN. If you earn it, it’s less a privilege than it is your due.
But to your point, if our melanin-intensive brothers would demonstrate the same behaviors, it is likely they would realize the same “privileges.”
Fascinating story, very inspiring.
Your granddaughters are very lucky to have you for a grandma.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.